Compared to what? Even the 802.11g standard should be able to keep up with your internet connection, assuming that is your result from speedtest.net in your sig. In fact, there aren't too many ISPs that can actually saturate the 802.11g spec pipeline anyway. The main benefit to N is in file transfers from computer to computer. Like I said before, N is a marketing gimmick which people are clearly lapping up.EvillE423 wrote:Transfer rates up to 300 Mbps too. The Linksys I bought you can get up to 300 Mbps and it's like night and day downloading movies and online gaming
"Any current one" doesn't include that. A G router is relatively archaic.audtatious wrote:Dunno about that. My Linksys G craps out when running torrent downloads....granted, it works fine for the PC doing the download but others connected via wireless or directly stop functioning (even ones only using 20% bandwidth) until I close the program.
Compared to my old Netgear G. That is the result from my home test, it's not great, but it's a HUGE step up from what I used to get. I just have a basic 1 Mbps cable connection. You can upgrade it to 8, 16, or 25 Mbps, but never have. COD online was laggy and choppy as hell, torrent downloads took hours and days. With my Linksys-N router I get 300 Mbps speed, with my old G, 54 Mbps. I can download an 800 mb movie in about an hour, before it took 10-12 hours sometimes. I downloaded COD MW 2 in 13h and its 11GB. I play it online now with no problems what-so-ever. It would have taken days to download that with my old router. I don't think that it's a marketing gimmick at all or I wouldn't have experienced such a drastic change.AppleBonker wrote:Compared to what? Even the 802.11g standard should be able to keep up with your internet connection, assuming that is your result from speedtest.net in your sig. In fact, there aren't too many ISPs that can actually saturate the 802.11g spec pipeline anyway. The main benefit to N is in file transfers from computer to computer. Like I said before, N is a marketing gimmick which people are clearly lapping up.EvillE423 wrote:Transfer rates up to 300 Mbps too. The Linksys I bought you can get up to 300 Mbps and it's like night and day downloading movies and online gaming
G router does fine if you are just surfing the internet. I only have a 40Mb service.flohtingPoint wrote:"Any current one" doesn't include that. A G router is relatively archaic.audtatious wrote:Dunno about that. My Linksys G craps out when running torrent downloads....granted, it works fine for the PC doing the download but others connected via wireless or directly stop functioning (even ones only using 20% bandwidth) until I close the program.
Check out this page to see if your router is compatible. http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/support/router-databaseG router does fine if you are just surfing the internet. I only have a 40Mb service.
You can walk into pretty much any store and pick up a WRT54G right now. Easily one of the most commonly stocked routers in my experience. I'd say that qualifies as "current." And they have horrible lifespans.flohtingPoint wrote:"Any current one" doesn't include that. A G router is relatively archaic.audtatious wrote:Dunno about that. My Linksys G craps out when running torrent downloads....granted, it works fine for the PC doing the download but others connected via wireless or directly stop functioning (even ones only using 20% bandwidth) until I close the program.
Wait, what?MinisterofDOOM wrote:
You can walk into pretty much any store and pick up a WRT54G right now. Easily one of the most commonly stocked routers in my experience. I'd say that qualifies as "current." And they have horrible lifespans.
I can pick up my Grandma from the old folks home, doesn't mean she's current.MinisterofDOOM wrote:You can walk into pretty much any store and pick up a WRT54G right now. Easily one of the most commonly stocked routers in my experience. I'd say that qualifies as "current." And they have horrible lifespans.flohtingPoint wrote:"Any current one" doesn't include that. A G router is relatively archaic.
Like others have said, N is really unnecessary much of the time. Unless you're doing large file transfers within the same wireless network, you're not going to see any real performance benefits over G. Which is why, despite being older, G hasn't gone away.
Actually, this is the one I have ... I typo'ed my original post here, so went back and edited it to show the correct model number.EvillE423 wrote:Check this one out, D-Link DIR-655:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications ... CatId=2668
Yes, agreed, but it helps with internal server accesses - both at home and at work for me. In fact, the 300Mbits/sec that a Dlink DIR-655 can achieve with the DIR-662 PCI card in my son's computer makes a world of a difference when loading files from the backup servers, movies, etc. At work, I only see 54 Mbit/sec speeds (using N routers and laptops) when in conference rooms, and again, it helps with local server accesses.AppleBonker wrote:Compared to what? Even the 802.11g standard should be able to keep up with your internet connection, assuming that is your result from speedtest.net in your sig. In fact, there aren't too many ISPs that can actually saturate the 802.11g spec pipeline anyway. The main benefit to N is in file transfers from computer to computer. Like I said before, N is a marketing gimmick which people are clearly lapping up.



