numbnuts240 wrote:and i'm sad that your fb account exists. no, i will never stop giving you crap for that.
numbnuts240 wrote:and i'm sad that your fb account exists. no, i will never stop giving you crap for that.
What are you a butthurt Redskins fan who got owned by everyone? 0-6 in division play, yikes.HashiriyaS14 wrote:There's no way **** Romo and Big Wade are going to the show. They're choke artists.
I said it back in like week 4.
Ravens/Saints (or maybe Saints/Indy)
LOLtimay wrote:The Cowboys have one of the best rush defenses (Ware, Ratliff, Brooking Bradie James, etc). Great pass defense (Jenkins, Newman, Sensabaugh, Hamlin) 2 great running backs (Barber for power, Jones for speed), 2 great receivers (Austin, and I am including Witten), 1 good receiver (Crayton), and one receiver who could be on the same level with Austin and Witten (Williams) if he were on the same page with Romo. Also I didn't mention the Cowboys have a great quarterback by the name of Tony Romo, hate on him all you want but he is the real deal. Hell the Cowboys have one of the best kickoff guys in Buehler who is a touchback machine. The only real weakness is in the kicking, with Shaun Suisham, and thats actually a pretty big concern, since he is a field goal kicker.
numbnuts240 wrote:go niners?
They started off pretty slowly early in the season (almost losing to the chiefs), then turned it on, then turned it off, now they seem to have figured it out and are running on all cylinders. I think the Cowboys might be the best team right now in the NFL, with the Ravens and Jets close behind. Then again if Flacco can find a way to get the ball to Mason, Clayton, Heap etc, with Ray Rice and Mcgahee in the backfield and that defense, oh my, could be interesting.HashiriyaS14 wrote:
LOL
I'm just saying, despite all that, they've performed less than stellar this season relative to some of the other teams that they're going to be up against in the postseason. They're a good football team, but the Vikings are (IMO) a better football team.
Welker is easily the most important receiver in the NFL. Brady uses him more then the Pats use Maroney, so with out him Brady seems lost. Also if the Ravens play the Pats 100 times, the Ravens would won't beat them by the margin they did on Sunday. A 24 point first quarter was a fluke. So just because the Ravens demolished the Pats on Sunday doesn't mean the Ravens are Super Bowl favorites all of a sudden. Don't get me wrong, I like the Ravens, I think they are good, but Super Bowl favorites? Really?Bmore-coupe wrote:
They have almost beaten them the last 3 times that they have played the Pats. Don't call losing Welker a "bad Pats team". All teams play with injuries (I know we are missing quite a few starters) The Ravens lost all of their starting secondary and Brady still couldn't throw on them.
Oh and I am a Ravens fan through good and bad, and am a realist, not a blind fan. I didn't see that coming, but the Ravens kicked the s*** out of the Pats and it was well deserved because they outplayed them on both sides of the ball.
They had no answer for Ray Rice or our beat up defense. Flacco didn't do s***, which kind of worries me going forward.
See the problem with having a shut down corner in Revis is... He only covers one man.timay wrote:I would have liked to seen a Jets colts rematch so that the Jets could beat the A squad, and it is totally possible because of their defense, with shut down corner Darrelle Revis and that pretty good run defense. Only thing that really ruins games for the Jets is the inexperience in Sanchez, but from his performance against the Bengals in the playoffs, Jets are a team to watch out for. It definitely wouldn't surprise me that they made or even won the Super Bowl.
Yes true, but then again having your main receiver (Wayne) shut down, does effect the team in that, Revis can go 1 on 1 with Wayne, and Collie or Garcon can be double teamed, not that either are actually worth a double team. Collie and Garcon are most effective because teams are game planning to stop Wayne and Clark, and those teams don't have a Revis, Asomugha, etc.RCA wrote:Manning uses all 6 receivers, so Revis' affect isn't the same. We couldn't even cover Laveranues Coles (Bengals 2nd reciever) so imagine trying to cover Dallas Clark, Garcone and Collie... all while stopping Addai running and catching out of the back field. When the Jets played the Colts the Jets were getting out classed by the Colts until they pulled their starters. I am glad we don't get to play them because I know what they can do.
But your right, if we don't put the game in the hands of Sanchez, and he throws over 100 QB rating then yes we have a great shot at winning it all...It's too bad his performance was a fluke. I have watched enough Jets football to know the Jets do not belong in the playoffs and Sanchez is the reason why.
I never said that I think that the Ravens will win the Super Bowl. Do I hope they do? yes.RCA wrote:Welker is easily the most important receiver in the NFL. Brady uses him more then the Pats use Maroney, so with out him Brady seems lost. Also if the Ravens play the Pats 100 times, the Ravens would won't beat them by the margin they did on Sunday. A 24 point first quarter was a fluke. So just because the Ravens demolished the Pats on Sunday doesn't mean the Ravens are Super Bowl favorites all of a sudden. Don't get me wrong, I like the Ravens, I think they are good, but Super Bowl favorites? Really?.
Well if it didn't work the first time the Jets played the Colts ...timay wrote:Yes true, but then again having your main receiver (Wayne) shut down, does effect the team in that, Revis can go 1 on 1 with Wayne, and Collie or Garcon can be double teamed, not that either are actually worth a double team. Collie and Garcon are most effective because teams are game planning to stop Wayne and Clark, and those teams don't have a Revis, Asomugha, etc.
- You might have not said it, but a lot of people on page one put the Ravens in the Super Bowl.Bmore-coupe wrote:I never said that I think that the Ravens will win the Super Bowl. Do I hope they do? yes.
I understand the importance of Welker, but to say that anything in that game was a fluke, or that we played "A bad Pats team" is ridiculous. The Ravens were playing with 2nd and 3rd string corners against Tom Brady and Randy Moss, but no one wants top point out those injuries.
This is the same thing that pissed me off after watching the interviews with Belichick and Brady this morning on Sportscenter. Not once, did either of them say that the Ravens played well, it was all about things that they didnt execute well. Give some credit to a team the just kicked your asses, and don't just act like "well, we would have won if we played like the Gods that we are."
The Pats are not as good as they once were. Their defense is mediocre at best. I'm not saying that the Ravens dont have many holes of their own, but, the team that played better won.The Pats have not recently beaten the Ravens by any large score, it usually comes down to one possession and penalties(I wont get into the penalties for doing anything against the "Golden Boy" Tom Brady).
As for next week, The Colts always have our number and blow us out(except for the playoff game in 2006 when we kept Manning out of the end zone for the entire game, but got beaten in a field goal match 15-6) . So I will stay hopeful, but realistic.
How about Harrison, Vrabel & Bruschi.Bmore-coupe wrote:Don't call losing Welker a "bad Pats team". All teams play with injuries (I know we are missing quite a few starters) The Ravens lost all of their starting secondary and Brady still couldn't throw on them.
timay wrote:ravens cowboys....done deal.
cowboys win 21-14.
timay wrote:Also I didn't mention the Cowboys have a great quarterback by the name of Tony Romo, hate on him all you want but he is the real deal.
Anyways, I think the Cowboys will do just fine.
timay wrote:I think the Cowboys might be the best team right now in the NFL, with the Ravens and Jets close behind.
nissangirl74 wrote:The Vikings ain't gonna make it. They s*** the bed when they had to start playing teams with winning records.
RCA wrote:But no worries, Childress will give Farve the reigns and allow him to audible to the best play instead of making him run the play that was originally called. They did well when Brett was in charge so they will see the light.
nissangirl74 wrote:Don't get me wrong about Favre or the Vikings. I've been a fan of Brett Favre for a long time and I hope he does well, but I don't think this is gonna be his year.
Quote »Also, timay your in site on the NFL is terrible. Please stop.[/quote]timay wrote:
I don't think the Colts make it past next week, so unfortunately we wont see a rematch of them against the Jets..
So if that's the case, why in the hell do you keep saying stuff like this?timay wrote:Yeah I was wrong, and I can admit it.
Why and how do you think the Jets are going to do this? If you're going to say crap like this, you need to back it up with some kind of a rational thought pattern instead of a random brain vomit. The Colts held a tough team to a field goal that wiped the field with the almighty Patriots the week before. They were supposed to lose many times this past season according to all the experts, but it just didn't happen.timay wrote:Still, I think the Jets will beat the Colts next week. It wont be a blowout, but the Jets will win by the skin of their teeth.
Yeah, both losing teams mustered an early field goal and then were dominated for the better part of the game, but I suppose the Colts and Vikes defense had nothing to do with that right? It was all about Baltimore and Dallas failure and not Indy and Minnesota success.timay wrote:I watched both the Ravens and Cowboys games, and both teams failed in similar ways
timay wrote:I mean whens the last time you saw a wide receiver force a fumble on an interception? Really unfortunate things happened in both games.
timay wrote:Still, I think the Jets will beat the Colts next week. It wont be a blowout, but the Jets will win by the skin of their teeth.