The Vikings ain't gonna make it. They s*** the bed when they had to start playing teams with winning records.RCA wrote:Chargers vs either the Vikings or Saints.
But the Jets will beat them all so it doesn't matter
QFT!!you sir, speak the truthtimay wrote:ravens cowboys....done deal.
cowboys win 21-14.
Week 4 GBWeek 6 BalWeek 7 PitWeek 8 GBnissangirl74 wrote:The Vikings ain't gonna make it. They s*** the bed when they had to start playing teams with winning records.
Ok seriously, who has a winning record at Week 4? There is no such thing in the grand scheme of things. Don't get me wrong about Favre or the Vikings. I've been a fan of Brett Favre for a long time and I hope he does well, but I don't think this is gonna be his year. Just myRCA wrote:
Week 4 GBWeek 6 BalWeek 7 PitWeek 8 GB
All had winning records. The Vikings problem came when they lost to 3 straight teams at the end of the year with losing records. But no worries, Childress will give Farve the reigns and allow him to audible to the best play instead of making him run the play that was originally called. They did well when Brett was in charge so they will see the light.
I would have liked to seen a Jets colts rematch so that the Jets could beat the A squad, and it is totally possible because of their defense, with shut down corner Darrelle Revis and that pretty good run defense. Only thing that really ruins games for the Jets is the inexperience in Sanchez, but from his performance against the Bengals in the playoffs, Jets are a team to watch out for. It definitely wouldn't surprise me that they made or even won the Super Bowl.BusyBadger wrote:The Jets beat the Colts? Not really, they scored more points on the backups after the Colts pulled their starters to protect & rest them, a decision that has doomed them in past and I predict it will doom them again. The Colts did learn one thing though, they better hope Manning doesn't get hurt as Curtis Painter has no business touching a football unless he's wiping it off with a towel and handing it back to a ref.
I was hoping for a Pats win, not because I care about the Pats, but because I wanted to see a Colts-Jets rematch and a real game like we should have seen in week 15.
Unfortunately a "L" is an "L", regardless of which players were on the field. You are only as strong as your weakest link. (Ask the back-up Texas freshmen quarterback (Gilbert) who had to play almost the entire game after their senior quarterback (McCoy) got hurt on the 3rd play).BusyBadger wrote:The Jets beat the Colts? Not really, they scored more points on the backups after the Colts pulled their starters to protect & rest them, a decision that has doomed them in past and I predict it will doom them again. The Colts did learn one thing though, they better hope Manning doesn't get hurt as Curtis Painter has no business touching a football unless he's wiping it off with a towel and handing it back to a ref.
I was hoping for a Pats win, not because I care about the Pats, but because I wanted to see a Colts-Jets rematch and a real game like we should have seen in week 15.
Eh, morale already took the big hit once management decided to pull the starters the previous game and not pursue destiny.nissangirl74 wrote:The a**-whooping they got from the Bills didn't help moral much either (30-7)
They have almost beaten them the last 3 times that they have played the Pats. Don't call losing Welker a "bad Pats team". All teams play with injuries (I know we are missing quite a few starters) The Ravens lost all of their starting secondary and Brady still couldn't throw on them.RCA wrote:Every one jumps on the Ravens because they played a bad Pats team?
I am sad that existsinitial_jc wrote:if LT follows this it will be all chargers ftw
LT DANCE