Why? I don't understand...



Betamax was where it's at. Beta is what HD-DVD was today, the better format. However the lessor quality/ DRM version won out VHS/ Blu-rayHijacker wrote:-=yawn=- VHS is so mainstream. Betamax is where it's at.
Because VCR's never eat tapes....... Leaving not only the tape garbage, but the machine as well until you are willing to disassemble it and unravel the mess within.Dattebayo wrote:(Didn't watch video) I've got a ton of VHS tapes, it's not like everyone converted everything to DVD back in the 90s... Also, several of my fav old movies are not readily available on DVD, nor would I bother to spend money on what isn't broken just to have a stupid disc that I can scratch easily...
My Dances With Wolves copy was bought at a McDonalds believe it or not.alms24sebring wrote:Everyone in here has a hidden shelf or box that hasnt been opened in a decade or more, full of classic Duck Tales, Dances with Wolves, Nightmare Before Christmas, and other random VHS tapes of childhood.
How is this not a permanent medium? Grab a blu-ray player or a PS3 for a couple hundred bucks and play anything you put into it. My parents are still determined to keep their vhs player, but its been more useful for collecting dust than anything else.Dattebayo wrote:I wouldn't say everyone, but there are folks out there who believe in switching formats every time something new comes out...
Until we get a more permanent medium, I'm staying with what I already have, thanks.
Even stored a normal VHS tape will go bad sooner rather then later. Regular use will destroy them even faster from stretching.Dattebayo wrote:
I have tapes that have been stored for 25 years and they still play great. But, like Ian said, any cheap tape player will unravel them when the servos die. The idea is not to have a cheap player.
You'd be surprised how easy it is to get a scratch on the foil side. I recently helped one company design a "shredder" for them that exploited this weakness.krash wrote:Its kind of hard to mess up a DVD unless you're brutally not taking care of it. Blu-ray discs are even more durable.
Yup. My parents had a tons of VHS and (tapes that go into video cameras) 8mm tapes, so I spent $45 for a some capture hardware and transferred it digitally. Now It exists in the "cloud" on my fathers archive drive and on the houses backup server. I am thinking about buying a 1TB drive, putting the films on there and sending it to my buddy in LA.Gold Digger wrote:My folks have tons of VHS as well as DVD. I have a handful, myself.
The post saying that some of those old movies not being on digital media is one reason I won't get rid of my VHS till there are more titles being brought to DVD. Nothing against DVD (except that whole Blu-Ray vs. HD-DVD crap), just want to see more titles on disc.
"Data loss is usually observable as early as 15 years after the tape was made; and after 25-30 years, they can become unwatchable."Dattebayo wrote:Most people don't realize it, but any small scratch on the foil side of the disc and the data is lost, how is that more permanent than a tape?
Solid data mediums like SD cards are not susceptible to degaussing like a tape is, but there are multiple other concerns like corrupt files, etc...
I have tapes that have been stored for 25 years and they still play great. But, like Ian said, any cheap tape player will unravel them when the servos die. The idea is not to have a cheap player.