Scandinavian Flick wrote:
those scheming sons of *******...
i hate dealerships,
NOW the fact that your rear pads are at 40% is even more jacked up, your car isnt that old, your rear pads should last 60-70K miles,
What are you baseing the 60-70k figure on?
The fact the fluid was low indicates that the pads were wearing out.
as for the dealership not replacing the rear pads - rear brakes generally where half as fast as the fronts - so 40% thick pads on the back will last twice as long as the same thickness on the fronts. So in this case replacing the rear pads- would have been a rip-off.
Now that many of the ACs are passing the year mark and racking up the miles - the maintenance trends and any bugs should be starting to show - but it doesnt seem like many AC owners here have complained about the brakes.
I'm not saying there is necessarily a connection - but some Infiniti coupes had brake / rotor issues - although I think it was mainly the Brembo option that was affected. The only other issue - excessive brake dust with the factory pad. Infinitis are built and serviced with Nissan parts so there could be some commonality there.
I replaced mine at around 20k which apparently wasn;t soon enough because I needed rotors too. The later production pads and rotors are an upgrade to the original Infiniti (Nissan) rotors - so I was glad to pay less at the Nissan dealer for the same service as Infiniti. I'm discovering that I need to budget for brakes and tires - the price to pay ...
R the AC brakes any different than the Altima sedans?
Modified by Cali 2 Balti G at 6:23 PM 8/3/2008
Modified by Cali 2 Balti G at 6:27 PM 8/3/2008