i think you are refering to the black kouki, while everybody else is talking about the blue one. how could the pics be the same if i didnt post pics of the blue one? your somewhere in a land of your own. i dont even know what your talking about at this point.OriginalWheelman wrote:Why do people confuse me with him so much? I complain a lot more.Bubba1 wrote:Are you talking the same car that Oatmealman just described for you?
The worst part is he talks about it like it's a different car, even thought I looked for the Kouki he was talking about on detroit craigslist. It's the same pic ffs.
99% of the time it does. people don't modify their vehicles to baby them.SixRunner wrote:modding =/= abuse
The difference between you and Ferrari owners is that Ferrari owners can not only afford them but they understand how expensive it is to keep them. You don't.SixRunner wrote:I'm immature because i find a cherry car and want to buy it? damn, i wonder what you say about people that buy ferrari's.
SixRunner wrote:aesthetics are the first if not second most important part of a car.
Also, there's nothing "cherry" about what you posted. Just fyi, "cherry" means that it's tricked out and finished, requiring no work and is complete eye candy for the masses. You, on the other hand, found a second hand econo-car with dents, gauge wiring incomplete and an old stock 4 banger in it. Not the same thing.SixRunner wrote:I'm immature because i find a cherry car and want to buy it?
well... first off, the blue kouki has nothing wrong with excet an ebrake issue.. cherry? mhmm.Dattebayo wrote:Also, there's nothing "cherry" about what you posted. Just fyi, "cherry" means that it's tricked out and finished, requiring no work and is complete eye candy for the masses. You, on the other hand, found a second hand econo-car with dents, gauge wiring incomplete and an old stock 4 banger in it. Not the same thing.SixRunner wrote:I'm immature because i find a cherry car and want to buy it?
Proof enough that you sold yourself into believing the lie.
ni_san wrote:I gave up trying to make sense with the kid after he posted this:
SixRunner wrote:aesthetics are the first if not second most important part of a car.
Derp. I like how he says it's not a project car and never has been, and then defines it as a project car.This car is not a project car and never has been; when I bought this car it was a peace of sh*t that's why I invested too much on it and upgrading it
This guy should be in marketing. I guess he just somehow convinced us all that e-brakes aren't important.It's a daily driver car it's perfect no problem at all, the only thing is that it doesn't have an E-brake
I think you must have a cousin in Mt. Kisco NY (inside joke), because you're sounding like a fool. To answer your queston, in your case with your examples, YOU have no choice except the prius because you can't afford the Lambo. That has nothing to do with aesthetics and proof that it has EVERYTHNG to do with MONEY of which you don't have enough.SixRunner wrote:
ill give you ascenario, given that the following cars are mechanically identical (same HP, engine, suspension, everything), which would you rather drive?
prius, each part is a different color primer, smashed fenders all around, rusted to hell.
or a
clean as hell lamborghini gallardo.
proof that asthetics are important.
![]()
and theres really only 2 things to a car, mechanics and appearance. I would rather have a clean car as opposed to a turbo'd turd