The FPR goes after the fuel rail (it makes fuel pressure by stopping the fuel from flowing at the regulator so it only has one place to go, out your injectors)JS13240 wrote:Well I checked for leaks one more time before I put the rail back on and what do you know know, #1 was drippy. Turned out the rail was a little bent and messed up the oring when I put in the injector. Unfortunately even though the car seems to idle a little smoother its still to rich to even rev the motor a little.
IM trying to take the next step by installing the adjustable fuel pressure regulator but I still dont if it goes between filter and the rail or the tank and the rail. Also do you keep your stock fpr or have a fitting welded on the end of the rail?
I've double checked both cam and ditsy timing and it all looks good. I did the timing on my other cars before and if its off by even a little they either dont start or take alot of cranking to start where the 240, despite whatever problems its having, still starts up like a new car.PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:How is your timing? That vac sounds fine. Mine only runs at about -10 PSI at idle. Not many people measure vac in negative PSI though. Usually its mm Hg or inches Hg. Are you sure your valve timing is right?
The only other thing I can think of is to swap in your old injectors and old ECU and see if that 100% fixes the problem. If it does, Steve has some explaining to do, or you could get an SAFC or something on top of it. Let us know how you make out and WELCOME TO NICO!
Yeah, it was the original ecu and it worked fine when I was driving the car prior to going turbo.480sx wrote:Was the ECU you sent out to get tuned tested before you got it chipped?
Sounds good. I'd check the grounds first, that's the most common failure point. At least you know whats wrong now.JS13240 wrote:I reset the codes and I'm only throwing the maf code right now, also the knock sensor was replaced with a new one when I was rebuilding the motor.
Both of the links are the same and I have that picture saved on my computer. What I was trying to say earlier is that without the original s13 maf connector that diagram doesn't help me. After I wired the first black wire to the chassis it stopped throwing the code anyway, that just leaves the YR and the white wires that might need to be swapped.DevilMB3017 wrote:A quick google brought me to a Nico image on the .org.
http://www.ka-t.org/forums/vie...7100f
And of course, the famous JWT. http://www.ka-t.org/forums/vie...7100f
Same way my Enthalpy ECU runs with a knock code. And the TPS was also bad...but it was a wiring issue and didn't code out. Our setups are VERY similar, so I bet if you fix the knock sensor code you'll be good.JS13240 wrote:The car still runs rich, still wont rev at all, and the rpms just dip whenever I give it any throttle. Only code is 34, knock sensor.
How did you end up fixing it? I'm not sure what to do. With the solid motor mounts I think its going to see knock from the vibration no matter what. Does anyone with solid mm's have knock issues? Also the knock sensor is new so how likely is it that its malfunctioning?DevilMB3017 wrote:
Same way my Enthalpy ECU runs with a knock code. And the TPS was also bad...but it was a wiring issue and didn't code out. Our setups are VERY similar, so I bet if you fix the knock sensor code you'll be good.
It was the maf signal and the 12v wires that were crossed according to the jwt diagram so I dont think it would have shorted anything out from that. It is weird that either way the maf is wired I dont get a maf code, the only reason I got one earlier was because I didn't have the first ground going to the chassis.480sx wrote:If you wired your maf wrong its possible that you destroyed either your ECU, your MAF, or both. All depends on how you wired it.
It was the maf signal and the 12v wires that were crossed according to the jwt diagram so I dont think it would have shorted anything out from that. It is weird that either way the maf is wired I dont get a maf code, the only reason I got one earlier was because I didn't have the first ground going to the chassis. From what it sounds like, even if the maf was bad I would at least be able to rev the motor to 2000 with it unplugged but that's not the case. Yes, the symptoms do seem maf-like but when I take it out of the equation the problem persists.480sx wrote:If you wired your maf wrong its possible that you destroyed either your ECU, your MAF, or both. All depends on how you wired it.