You are stupid, and this post does not even deserve a proper response.redtop91 wrote:Reliability and NA power are not things that you can use together unless you are talking a V8 or something. Small displacement NA motors have to rev to make power and revs reduce reliability.
How do you breathe? Who allows you to sit at a computer and post? If you are this stupid online, with information readily available at your fingertips, I can only imagine how stupid you are in person.redtop91 wrote:You also probably aren't making much more power than stock. I'm talking extreme NA builds, which happen to be impossible on the DOHC and rare on the SOHC.
Listen you ****ing dip****, PROVE that honda's K-series motors (rev over 8000rpm) are Not as reliable as a LS series block. You are going to make yourself look even more ignorant than you are.redtop91 wrote:Maybe because you don't have one? High power NA motors are not reliable. Period. How about you come up with an actual response (which I know you don't have)? It's easy to call info wrong and not know what is correct, buck-o.
Comparing the K series to any LS block is a massive failure on your part. It really shows how little you know about anything. K series rev much higher to make power than LS blocks which has a direct effect on engine life. I don't care what you say, living at 8000+ will cause more trouble than a big block making that power at under half its redline. My point was not to discredit the original SAFC tuning concept which again proves you have the reading comprehension of a 4th grader. I'll believe you when you show me a 400whp K series, or any production 4 banger for that matter, making LS power and is equally reliable, I will concede your greatness.Iceman00 wrote:
Listen you ****ing dip****, PROVE that honda's K-series motors (rev over 8000rpm) are Not as reliable as a LS series block. You are going to make yourself look even more ignorant than you are.
Based on what? Honda Engines have been able to run over the 200K mile mark for over 15 years. GM's LS motors will snap Valve springs, Pushrods, and piston slap thier way to 150K miles. Please, do an apples to apples comparison. Use proof.redtop91 wrote:
Comparing the K series to any LS block is a massive failure on your part.
You don't even have the slightest idea. I guess your forgetting what motor oil does, and how ****ty OHV valvetrains are.redtop91 wrote: It really shows how little you know about anything. K series rev much higher to make power than LS blocks which has a direct effect on engine life. I don't care what you say, living at 8000+ will cause more trouble than a big block making that power at under half its redline.
What was your point? And What did it have to do with what he asked?redtop91 wrote: My point was not to discredit the original SAFC tuning concept which again proves you have the reading comprehension of a 4th grader.
Way to use a STOCK Honda motor as an example. My point remains that high HP small displacement motors are not reliable. Show me proof of a 300+whp NA honda that is over the 200k mark. I'll show you plenty of LT1's.Iceman00 wrote:Based on what? Honda Engines have been able to run over the 200K mile mark for over 15 years.
Which is why the C6R has been winning races for years with OHV. People can discredit GM for using dated tech but dated does not equate to inferior in every case.Iceman00 wrote:You don't even have the slightest idea. I guess your forgetting what motor oil does, and how ****ty OHV valvetrains are.
My reply was to address this:Iceman00 wrote:
What was your point? And What did it have to do with what he asked?
He was thinking that a NA build will increase reliability. I was making it clear that he cannot achieve that with anything but low NA HP goals. Stop destroying this thread. Make another one and we can wage e-warfare all day. I won't reply to anymore of your postspsi240 wrote:i did do a ka-t setup .. going back to NA ka .. Need reliability and that is not possible without a built engine + $$$ on tuning.
On a KA with an auto transmission, you don't see the same benefits at all with bolt ons as you would a 5 speed. So I'll call an easy BS on that unless you can provide dyno charts of YOUR car before and after.Iceman00 wrote:
I gained 20whp in mid range, and over 10whp at peak with a JWT ecu. I only had two mods besides the ecu. Intake, and header. Stock cams, Stock Exhaust, and a Auto trans.
I say pick up a used JWT ecu, and don't bother with the SAFC
Because I enjoy making others look like idiots, here you go.boznuttz wrote:
On a KA with an auto transmission, you don't see the same benefits at all with bolt ons as you would a 5 speed. So I'll call an easy BS on that unless you can provide dyno charts of YOUR car before and after.
And you know what? I CAN. My brother's stock KA with an auto trans put a good 104 to the wheels. After a few weeks, we dynoed it again with a new intake, crank pulley, headers, straight pipe to replace the cat, and an Apexi 3inch N1 exhaust.
On the same dyno several weeks later......an amazing 110 to the wheels. They might be floating around here somewhere, and if not, I don't feel like getting it JUST for you. This was 2 years ago with a motor on 120k miles.
After performing a 5 speed swap on the same car, it dynoed at 142 on a dynojet.
Next time you want to start calling out other Nico members and acting like an Internet Gangster, just remember. Ignorance and posts like yours just make you look like even more of an idiot.
You talking specific output of a motor over 120hp/liter, compared to a motors volumetric efficiency of 70hp/liter. Yeah, apples to apples comparison my ***. Putting a LS1 at 500whp N/a, and I guarantee **** will break.redtop91 wrote:Way to use a STOCK Honda motor as an example. My point remains that high HP small displacement motors are not reliable. Show me proof of a 300+whp NA honda that is over the 200k mark. I'll show you plenty of LT1's.
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it? MY POINT IS THAT HIGH HP SMALL DISPLACEMENT NA MOTORS ARE NOT RELIABLE.
Yes, this is true.boznuttz wrote:Well congratulations, your d!ck is huge.
I've seen Auto 240sx's put down 140+whp with bolt ons. Maybe your brothers car was a bad example. As always, I have proof.boznuttz wrote:I guess I sorta saw this coming, especially since we didn't verify whether it was an S13 chassis or not, and FWD and RWD auto trans applications have different outputs and hp loss to the wheels. And on that note, everything stated earlier does in fact apply to the S13 itself. Using an Altima as an example isn't the answer I was looking for, nor for a few onlookers......but it is our fault that we didn't specify that we were strictly talking about the KA24DE that came in the 240SX chassis, and not the Altima, since they clearly are not the same exact engine setup.
A few of the local shops around me that dyno a good amount of auto KA S13s before doing an SR swap ( Heavy Throttle, now Intense Auto Performance and a few others) all showed low numbers. So bolt ons on the S13s I've seen really don't do much with auto transmissions. However, on an Altima, I do see your point, and there can be a huge difference in the amount of power planted through different drivetrains.Iceman00 wrote:
I've seen Auto 240sx's put down 140+whp with bolt ons. Maybe your brothers car was a bad example. As always, I have proof.
As far as the altima goes, it uses the same 240/248 combo earlier S13 KA's used, but I do benift from less drivetrain loss.
Drives, idles, sounds just like stock. Requires 91, we have 93 in Florida. Gas milage is the same, if not 2mpg better than stock.psi240 wrote:damn i didnt know JWT made ecu for NA application.
Iceman - what octane is the ecu tuned for ? hows the idle, mileage etc compared to stock? What header are u using?
How come u dont have an aftermarket exhaust
Stock Auto S14boznuttz wrote:A few of the local shops around me that dyno a good amount of auto KA S13s before doing an SR swap ( Heavy Throttle, now Intense Auto Performance and a few others) all showed low numbers. So bolt ons on the S13s I've seen really don't do much with auto transmissions. However, on an Altima, I do see your point, and there can be a huge difference in the amount of power planted through different drivetrains.