i'm probally misinformed......but i was under the impression that anything above 11:1 was fineNismo_Freak wrote:A/F looks prime for detonation, especially with a sidemount.
It's pretty lean at the torque peak.
No...its the other way around....you dont want to go much about 12:1 and not much below 11:1. I usually tune my cars to 11.5 for safety. Some people to get numbers will tune up to 12.5 afr, but that, and anything more IMO is risky. I havent looked at many stock SR dynos or AFR data, but it only looks to be lean under spool, which really isnt the worst thing....AFR under high rpms is more of a concern...at youre sitting at 12...so its ok IMO. BUT, like i said, ive never looked at other sr dynos...so ill kinda check around and compare. nice numbers BTWspider_slayer wrote:i'm probally misinformed......but i was under the impression that anything above 11:1 was fine
That *someone* knows more about SR ECU tuning than anyone, so I'd give his opinion a little more respect. http://www.rs-enthalpy.com if anyone wants to know.DeathBy240SX wrote:Thanks. Yeah I was happy with the numbers. An SRT4 front mount and SAFC2 are going in soon so I hope I can boost the numbers a bit.
Someone tells me running that lean is normal for a stock untuned SR. Anyone else agree with that? I haven't been too successful finding other stock SR dyno sheets.