Post by
CINNALOCKS »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/cinnalocks-u19492.html
Mon Aug 24, 2009 12:51 pm
I think there is a misunderstanding here. There technically is no such thing as full coverage. EACH and EVERY policy is different. There are many options and you can take them all but most are redundant and just to raise the monthly payment.I know a little about insurance. I did have enough coverage to handle this matter. That is why either as a um claim or a comp claim, (should we find the other responsible party), but I am covered. The comp claim has a $500 deductible the um a $300 deductible.
For Instance I could have comp/collision, med-pay umpd and umbi, rental and towing which essentially is full coverage, but if the limits are not sufficient you will not be covered beyond the stated coverage amount. So will you have plenty of coverage you are not totally protected, so how can it be full coverage.
Coverage is not the issue here however. The issue here is only one of ratios In Indiana from what I understand ( as in many other states, but not all) if the cost to repair the vehicle is 70-75 per cent of the market value of the vehicle then it can be totaled. I do not have the estimate yet but the numbers are about $3,300 for my Q and $2,700 plus for the repair.
As I see it now, my fight is to either have them decrease the estimate or increase the value of the Q, to change the numbers and reappraise it. Should I have to salvage, then at least my buyout figure will increase. I have also been told I should have an opportunity to buy the vehicle back from salvage at a fraction of the cost and re title it as with a clean title.
I was told the claim is being reassigned to the Salvage Unit and has yet to be assigned to an adjuster. I would expect to hear from them soon. I will continue to post til it is resolved within limits.
Thanks for all the interest, input and concerns.