They are NOT the same thing. Stance is much better, however, it sounds like xtrmnop does not need the extra durability and performance of the Stance coilovers so I am going to say for him to go with Megan.smocan wrote:it seriously doesnt matter... and if you want to pay 200-300 dollars more because they "look better" whatever that means, go for it. both are good, both will not dissapoint you. i went with megans only because why pay 2-300 bucks more for the same thing, and i have no complaints... your call
well thats great, stance is much better, whatever.... its how YOU perceive them to be. i've driven on both and they are extremely similar. and i know people with stances and megans... both durable, nothing has gone wrong with either. so IN MY OPINION, neither are better than another. But thats just me, and what do i know...karmakaze wrote:They are NOT the same thing. Stance is much better, however, it sounds like xtrmnop does not need the extra durability and performance of the Stance coilovers so I am going to say for him to go with Megan.
steagans=the bastard child of stance n megan. I have megan streets, no probs, nice ride, no complaints.adrians_s13 wrote:steagans gr+ streets
impressive talent youve got there. and i agree, stance is where its at.mike240 wrote:hahahaha your soo funny save up your money get them stance do the chicken dance all the way to france while on your stance they are beefier and great for daily and track megan are wack you get what you pay for you silly silly post whore
BOOBS!!!
its not how u perceive something to be when it comes to performance parts. there are ways to measure which one is better w/ raw data and cold hard facts. just because u PERCEIVE a stock ka to be fast doesnt mean the sr isnt better. ps- where in pa are usmocan wrote:
well thats great, stance is much better, whatever.... its how YOU perceive them to be. i've driven on both and they are extremely similar. and i know people with stances and megans... both durable, nothing has gone wrong with either. so IN MY OPINION, neither are better than another. But thats just me, and what do i know...
dude nothing came up. i tried searching "for the love of Jesus" just like u said and there was nothing on nico about itredtop91 wrote:Yay. Yet another of these threads... I'm not going to beat around the bush anymore. SEARCH for the LOVE OF JESUS!!!! I've read through 9-10 of these threads in the past 2 weeks. It was cute at first but now it's just annoying. Stance.
I have Megan street coilovers and I'm extremely happy with them, and have never had a problem with them. I know there not the most baller, jdm tyte coilover made but there perfect for me. I was under the impression that stance were the better made/performing coilovers but these threads have me thinking different.robnhoood wrote:I kno a lot of people that have megan coilovers, and they all have good things to say. A lot of people rip on them b.c they;re "cheap", taiwanese made coilovers, but the quality is actually pretty good
i agree. sorry. not completely true. cause this was being debated when megan first released their coilovers. and a call to apexi confirmed that megan uses their designs for apexi coilovers. so in essence they are knockoffs. apexi uses better materials and has better springs. but the apexi are still overpriced imo. i myself run k sports and they are decent. but i plan on upgrading to stance, silk road, or jic magic. but will most likely go with either stance or jic magic as i know more people who swear by them.White Comet wrote:^ dude search. there is proof that the "megans are the same as apexi" argument is not fact at all. do some searching and you'll find it. and imo the teins are awesome, the megans are ok but the tein type he's are far better than megan
have you even tried k sports white comet? the only thing thats bad about them are the low speed dampening rate. they are decent for the price i bought them for and they did well for me during several autocross and two DD's.White Comet wrote:^ exactly, the apexi's are different though not the exact same like some ppl think. yeah i would ditch the ksports asap. they suck
blackieblack wrote:have you even t
have you even tried k sports white comet? the only thing thats bad about them are the low speed dampening rate. they are decent for the price i bought them for and they did well for me during several autocross and two DD's.
mrgreeneyes has them in his car (not for long) and after a few months one of the fronts blew and teh other one is on its way out. sure there are some bad roads around here but its not like he dukes of hazard jumps off of stuff. no matter how bad teh roads they should have lasted longer than they did w/o blowingblackieblack wrote:have you even t
have you even tried k sports white comet? the only thing thats bad about them are the low speed dampening rate. they are decent for the price i bought them for and they did well for me during several autocross and two DD's.