IvoryJ30t wrote:congradulations!!!! you the proud new owner of a deeper hole!!!
ok, instead of me flying off the handle on this one, im just going to stop arguing with you. this is obviously going nowhere, and your just going to continue to tout what you consider "right" no matter how wrong you are, and you refuse to be reasoned with.
I dont claim to know everything, but if theres something i dont know im open to learn. your just completely seadfast in your ignorant statements, and theres no getting through to you.
you fail to back your statements up with proven facts, and since i disapprove of rear wings, i "know nothing about high speed stability" in your mind.
i'm really confused. it seems like you keep seeing things in my post that i did not imply. like me me "touting what i consider right no matter what..." well, so far, i've seen nothing from you that proves me wrong. if i am wrong, i would like to know, and i am open to that possibility, as i have already proven. i think you are a little confused on a wing's purpose, based on my research. however, if my knowledge is incorrect, and i am the one who is confused, please, enlighten me.
IvoryJ30t wrote:and with mordern technology, there nearly obsolete.ok, i aknowledge that wings have their place, but they do not serve nearly the purpose that you think they do. and with mordern technology, there nearly obsolete.
i guess formula one and indy cars are obsolete??