chmercer wrote:why would the fact that a 240 is rear wheel drive have anything to do with the amount of downforce it needs?
chmercer wrote:hmm. why would a street driven 240 need the additional downforce that would be added from a home installed, 50 dollar aluminum bookshelf? i dont see many 240s spinning their rear tires on the highway, they seem to have enough load to keep it on the ground. i guess if you like understeering all over the place at high speeds it would be a good idea to put a big ghetto wing on your car. who needs traction on the front wheels anyway? its a rear wheel drive car right? you only need the drive wheels touching the pavment, duh.
IvoryJ30t wrote:you, my friend, are an idiot.
why? why would a rear wheel drive car need more downforce on the rear wheels than a front wheel drive car? do you understand weight shift at all? that is such an igornant statment.spitz7985 wrote:rwd requires downforce on the rear wheels at high speeds, more than a fwd car.
chmercer wrote:why? why would a rear wheel drive car need more downforce on the rear wheels than a front wheel drive car?
Mr1der wrote:that or just get your name changed to Shortbus for a month
chmercer wrote:if you arent 100% sure of somthing, dont act like it. it gives people a bad impression, which is what probably prompted ivoryj30t's comment of "you sir are a moron". even if you are pretty sure you are correct, just dont act like a genious, that way there is no way you can dig yourself into a hole. sorry for being angry earlier, done arguing now![]()
IvoryJ30t wrote:it takes little prompting to get a comment out of me.
especially when your trying to tell a person who works on cars for a LIVING [auto mechanic, electrician, tow truck driver] that he doesnt know what hes talking about.
ok, heres a prime example. how big is the rear wing on the Mercedes Benz S55 AMG, and the Ferrari 575M?
oh, i guess the engineers must have forgotten how important wings are. why dont you call them up and remind them.
chmercer wrote: if you arent 100% sure of somthing, dont act like it. it gives people a bad impression, which is what probably prompted ivoryj30t's comment of "you sir are a moron". even if you are pretty sure you are correct, just dont act like a genious, that way there is no way you can dig yourself into a hole. sorry for being angry earlier, done arguing now
spitz7985 wrote:high speed cars don't have big wings? whatever. i could give a hundred examples.
spitz7985 wrote:i'm sorry dude, but being an auto mechanic/tow truck driver gives you zero credibility when it comes to high speed racing. my uncle is a nissan tech, has been for 30 years, he knows jack about racing.
there are different kinds of high speed cars, requiring different size/shape wings. some have to take turns, others just go straight or run an oval.. the original comment of "if i were to build a high speed car, it would have a giant wing..." and its purpose was to challenenge people who call everything rice to reconsider their quick judgment. so back off. i don't even know what you're trying to prove. that high speed cars don't have big wings? whatever. i could give a hundred examples. who cares? like i said earlier, you're attacking something that is not there.