stebo0728 wrote:And another thing, who gets credit for the moon landing, historically? Kennedy right? Even though it occured on Nixon's watch? Why doesn't Nixon get the credit? It was Kennedy's program and plans thats why. The Osama takedown was Bush's plan, a plan that Obama followed through with no doubt, but historically who will get that credit? I understand in a campaign you take all the credit you can get for re-election, and I don't blame them for taking the Osama credit to make his record look better. But who will get that credit, historically?
I'm gonna need a really good citation on this one, Stebo.
Candidate Obama caught flak for suggesting that we should be launching attacks into Pakistan (by Governor Romney himself, and by others, even right here on these boards), and President Obama continued to catch flak. I don't remember
anyone actually talking about President Bush's incursions into Pakistan.
You don't get to claim credit because you once thought, "Golly gee, it might be a good idea to go do that." President Obama initiated the policy decision that got us into Pakistan, which resulted in the killing of Osama bin Laden. President Bush probably really wanted to kill Osama bin Laden, but I see
nothing to indicate that he planned to go out of his way to get the guy. As far as I can tell, President Bush saw it as not a big priority. Maybe he was right - maybe it wasn't a huge priority, or shouldn't have been. Still, you can't credit him now because he started the War in Afghanistan.
I understand that it's super inconvenient for Republicans that President Obama made the decisions that resulted in the death of Osama bin Laden, but that doesn't mean you get to rewrite history. I'll ask you the same thing I asked before: had the thing been botched, who would have received the blame, "historically?"