oh yeah show me a KA that makes that power. Really shure it's possible.With a knife edged crank and a T63 turbo....pregmantis wrote:drfterboy, dont worry, you can easily make peak power past 6000rpm.
i have the cams i want well i dont have them yet but i know which ones i want and my engine will be held in the higher RPM's for sustained periods of time. and sounds cool do they pull all the way through out the RPM band?pregmantis wrote:drfterboy, dont worry, you can easily make peak power past 6000rpm. how much higher and sustained is another issue. a simple cam(the right ones)change will change your rpm range(peak torque/power). oh, btw the ssheaders are pretty good headers. I will try to send you a pic of my friends modified sohc header. its ugly(not coated and then painted). they are also 6yrs old.
WTF?!pregmantis wrote:drfterboy, dont worry, you can easily make peak power past 6000rpm. how much higher and sustained is another issue. a simple cam(the right ones)change will change your rpm range(peak torque/power). oh, btw the ssheaders are pretty good headers. I will try to send you a pic of my friends modified sohc header. its ugly(not coated and then painted). they are also 6yrs old.
HEY I LIKE YOUR STYLE KID!!! thanks for posting this thread and taking all the flaming that goes with trying to stay N/A. i also want to stay N/A with my SOHC!!!! i know CRAZY!!! well i got some good info out of this post so keep up the good work!DrifterBoy240 wrote:okay i didnt want this thread to become a heated discussion on wether or not i can rev a KA passed a certain RPM range, cause all i asked was there any places that sell any KA N/A upgrade parts. instead of the endless turbo upgrades i can do, and sorry but I WANT TO BE DIFFERANT!!!! and build up a KA N/A sorry but that is just my own opinion!
O.k the FJ used a 92mm bore the KA uses an 89mm bore.The FJ uses a FULLY COUNTER WEIGHED crank, the KA uses a HALF WEIGHTED and balanced crank. FJ24 uses a 88mm stroke, the KA uses a 96mm stroke. Most of the KA's inability to high rev is ...well.... Stroke is much larger making much more turbulance, than the slightly smaller FJ crank. The halfweighted KA crank also becomes harmonically disturbed as rpm's increase mostly due to the half weights directed towards the middle of pistons 2 and 3. A fully counter weighed crank allows for equal balance across the entire crank, allowing for less stress and flexing.NISMO has made a fully counter weighed crank for the KA with newely designed pistons, and rods the bottom end cost $8000.Your best bet to achieve some what close to a 7000RPM redline would be to knife edge the crank, and add a crank scraper, and windage tray. Any thing to drop the amount of turbulance and harmonic disturbance will make for a happier, healthier, high reving KA. I would then also focus on higher compression pistons. f you recall the FJ had a compression of 11.1:1.DrifterBoy240 wrote:okay let me start
the FJ24 was built as nissans racing engine for the early to late 80's, and the way they made the power form the FJ by having big bore short rod to stroke length, and a long crank to throw the RPM's around and of course it was a race motor but still the KA is a baby brother to this engine all the KA is is a revised street motor, so im wondering if i follow the same idea path of the FJ maybe i will get some decent numbers out of my KA? but still i know its not gonna be spectacular as seeing a turbo motor pull over 500HP easy but still it wil be respectable numbers for a KA N/A.
okay so maybe we can get some ideas going and maybe get the KA to be a recognized motor instead of a hated neglected motor.
there is just one thing i ask dont post up about any turbo stuff please letes make this an intelligent non-biased thread that only has to do with N/A
yea i knew that the FJ had a larger bore and shorter stroke, but what i was told by an old racer that when the FJ24 came out and he knew all the spec's and i told him the specs of my engine and he said it sounds like we have a revised engine from the FJ24 and just more modernized.Bigvinnie wrote:
O.k the FJ used a 92mm bore the KA uses an 89mm bore.The FJ uses a FULLY COUNTER WEIGHED crank, the KA uses a HALF WEIGHTED and balanced crank. FJ24 uses a 88mm stroke, the KA uses a 96mm stroke. Most of the KA's inability to high rev is ...well.... Stroke is much larger making much more turbulance, than the slightly smaller FJ crank. The halfweighted KA crank also becomes harmonically disturbed as rpm's increase mostly due to the half weights directed towards the middle of pistons 2 and 3. A fully counter weighed crank allows for equal balance across the entire crank, allowing for less stress and flexing.NISMO has made a fully counter weighed crank for the KA with newely designed pistons, and rods the bottom end cost $8000.Your best bet to achieve some what close to a 7000RPM redline would be to knife edge the crank, and add a crank scraper, and windage tray. Any thing to drop the amount of turbulance and harmonic disturbance will make for a happier, healthier, high reving KA. I would then also focus on higher compression pistons. f you recall the FJ had a compression of 11.1:1.
Obviously someone isn't paying attention to what I said earlier. Shortened stroke really isn't the problem, needing to get a FULLY COUNTER WEIGHED CRANK is. The KA crank is only half weighted, if it was a fully counter weighed crank it would accept high rev very well.DrifterBoy240 wrote:so lets see here? if i shorten the stroke on my KA and get high comp. pistons, and bore out the engine and all the other typical internal stuff like cams and valve train. i should have a nice decent motor to work with. granted i may need to put in a lot a bit of time and a lot a bit of some money into it it just might work? hmm.... its nice to dream right. and besides when building an nice motor from scratch there is a lot of trial and error. im so glad i have a spare DOHC KA in my garge to just go and work on. maybe start ripping apart the motor and taking down numbers and and seeing what might work and what wont work.
i take it just getting the crank balanced is out of the question, huh? does NISMO make one? or is that a custom one off piece?Bigvinnie wrote:
Obviously someone isn't paying attention to what I said earlier. Shortened stroke really isn't the problem, needing to get a FULLY COUNTER WEIGHED CRANK is. The KA crank is only half weighted, if it was a fully counter weighed crank it would accept high rev very well.