Huh?GEO wrote:lol ^ jew
Yep I decided yesterday to go instead with the Walbro 255 instead of the 190. Cool so I have FINALLY decided on a kit!!!GEO wrote:I like the kit, but I would advise and get a TiaL wastegate... Precision intercooler kit and a a better fuel pump.. a Walbro 190 is not going to cut it. OPT for the high flow 255. Everything else seems good, get some manifold gaskets for between head and exhaust manifold,a lso between wastegate and manifold. I think they are delagate gaskets.
Modified by GEO at 9:09 PM 3/22/2006
As for the wastegate I'm going to keep the JDG wastegate since it comes with the kit anyhow.daconkiftador wrote:Ive actually heard some good reviews about the JGS wastegate, but if your piecing the kit together individually id go with a tial.
Honestly the management is the only part I haven't fully decided on. I could go with Greddy, or AEM, or JimWolfTech, or even A'pexi. I do have to be careful though because where I live they do OBD-II and sniff testing.fiznat wrote:Looks good. JGS seems to put out some pretty quality stuff, I'm sure their kit is excellent.
Where do you plan on getting an E-Manage for 200 bucks? It costs a little more than that, and keep in mind that you'll have tuning/dyno costs also.
Are you not planning on using a blow off valve?
Looking good though. You seem to have all the big stuff covered (besides the BOV), and your $500 install budget seems more than reasonable for all the little minor things that will come up. Go for it!
Proof??? I can see someone saying that a 3 inch would be better, as it would.... but a 2.25 inch being too restrictive to run a turbo...??hnugen wrote:Also, the 2.25" exhaust is too restritive.
fiznat wrote:Where do you plan on getting an E-Manage for 200 bucks? It costs a little more than that
I completely agree on Enthalpy being the better rom tune. Not saying that JWT is bad in any sense, but their tunes really are on the more conservative side, and I know that people have complained about having some dead spots in the tune. I'm not sure if they've fixed this issue, but I know the Enthalpy tunes have been proven over and over to make good power while still being safe. Granted, his ka-t rom tunes are newer, but he's about as intelligent as they get with tuning, and if theres anything wrong will fix it for you.2FourTee wrote:And to the original poster, I am thinking about the same kit and I am going with either an SAFC or an Enthalpy tune. ENthalpy tunes are the same price as JWT with faster turn around time (you could wait a long, long time for JWT) and a safe, but much less conservative tune. (Lots of people have complained of JWT tunes running way too rich, like 10:1 and richer.)
Screw that, get a 1g DSM recirc valve for like $30 max, and some flex hose to recirc with, or just run a blowthrough MAFS. I guess you could also compensate with whatever management you choose but I haven't always had the best results with crappy "Dec Air" settings.Bosrudorfer wrote:
I forgot about the blow off valve *doh* guess that's another $150. I have seen some blitz go for $100 locally.
Thanks guys!
So...what are you asking me? The 2.25" exhaust is too restrictive to run a turbo and will cause too much back pressure. Good luck getting Enthalpy to chip your ECU. He's been real busy lately and hardly has time to reflash ECU.2FourTee wrote:Proof??? I can see someone saying that a 3 inch would be better, as it would.... but a 2.25 inch being too restrictive to run a turbo...??
Come on now....
ANd to the original poster, I am thinking about the same kit and I am going with either an SAFC or an Enthalpy tune. ENthalpy tunes are the same price as JWT with faster turn around time (you could wait a long, long time for JWT) and a safe, but much less conservative tune. (Lots of people have complained of JWT tunes running way too rich, like 10:1 and richer.)
Will his engine blow up???? Will his car overheat??? How many turbo 240's have you had and what harm has the "super-restrictive" 2.25 inch exhaust caused????hnugen wrote:So...what are you asking me? The 2.25" exhaust is too restrictive to run a turbo and will cause too much back pressure.
Last time I checked, JWT had a 6+ week turn around. Is Enthalpy's more??????hnugen wrote:Good luck getting Enthalpy to chip your ECU. He's been real busy lately and hardly has time to reflash ECU.
Haha, or mg of adderall, or lines of coke...lolfiznat wrote:Dude, 2FourTee, how many cups of coffee did you have before writing that post! Geez! Relax man.
LOL! Actually I had one too many cups of JD and Coca-Cola. No more drunk internet posting for me!!!fiznat wrote:Dude, 2FourTee, how many cups of coffee did you have before writing that post! Geez! Relax man.
Why on earth do you mix Jack? To me, anything other then on the rocks is a sin.2FourTee wrote:
LOL! Actually I had one too many cups of JD and Coca-Cola. No more drunk internet posting for me!!!
I just thought that was a silly thing to say and went a little overboard on my response.
Sorry
Are you talking about me going with the .63 or .48?nismofly wrote:Bosrudorfer you might want to see if they can substitue a smaller turbo, youll be making 200 at about 4 psi with that setup
holy ****, simmer down man Keep your $50, I dont want it. I've checked the exhaust on plenty of stock turbo cars. Heck, I did the clutch on a WRX this weekend. 2.25" is not restrictive if you're running a weeny turbo but it is if you put a turbo on your KA. You can run whatever you want but I run 3" all the way back to let my motor breath. I dont need to prove anything. Look at how much a t3/t04E flows and how much your head flows and tell me it's not sensible to run 3" I'm just going to use common sense right now. I'll get back with you if I ever find some test equipments2FourTee wrote:Will his engine blow up???? Will his car overheat??? How many turbo 240's have you had and what harm has the "super-restrictive" 2.25 inch exhaust caused????
Have you ever checked the exhaust of a factory turbo car, man??? A factory equipped Silvia from Japan doesn't even have a 3 inch exhaust, and many turbo 240's (KA-T's) have done very well off of 2.25 inch exhausts. There are a few 240's out there (again KA-T's) that have put down over 200 whp with a USDM KA24DE factory exhaust, which is more power than he is asking for (200 whp). Prove to me that his car will not run well because of .75 inch less exhaust diameter.
I'll even repeat myself and say that a 3 inch exhaust would be better, but I absolutely guarantee WITHOUT A DOUBT that you cannot prove that a 2.25 inch exhaust is "TOO RESTRICTIVE" to run a turbo KA safely.
I'll bet $50 Paypal that you can't prove it. Before you take that bet, realize what you are saying... that a 2.25 inch exhaust is... "too restrictive to run a turbo (KA-T)".....
Find that proof and you just won $50!!!!
Last time I checked, JWT had a 6+ week turn around. Is Enthalpy's more??????
When exactly was the last time you spoke to Scott?? Did he say exactly how far behind he was on his ECU tunes???? I heard he just started a new job. Did he say how that was going?
Modified by 2FourTee at 10:49 PM 3/23/2006