Depends on the flow level.cyrus240sx wrote:hmm very interesting..... now this might be hard to answer... but what gains would someone see if they had a turboed ka with stock intake compared to turboed with itb's?
There actually are gains even at relatively low levels. There's a dyno somewhere of someone upgrading to the really short runner greddy manifold on the SR20DET and it made his torque stay within 5% of peak all the way to redline, but with the stock one he had lost about 25% torque by redline.Nismo_Freak wrote:Depends on the flow level.
I don't think until you are pushing 300+ you will see any benefit in an intake manifold change. Simply because the turbocharger is pressurizing the intake manifold, the limiting factor is how much the engine can take in per the head flow.
Once you get a big enough turbo where you have large pressurized flows that are being restricted by the manifold's physical shape will you see gains.
It's different on a N/a engine where sheer engine vacuum is all you have to work with to provide flow.
Dyno on what ... a stock engine?InsanityInc wrote:There actually are gains even at relatively low levels. There's a dyno somewhere of someone upgrading to the really short runner greddy manifold on the SR20DET and it made his torque stay within 5% of peak all the way to redline, but with the stock one he had lost about 25% torque by redline.
No, it was modded, but only to about 260whp if I recall. I think it may have had different cams. With a turbocharged car, short *** runners are even more important because since you're forcing the air from the turbo to the engine, the less distance to travel the better.Nismo_Freak wrote:Dyno on what ... a stock engine?
The limit on the stock cams / manifold for the SR seems to be in the 330whp ballpark. Most of the restriction is the cams.
Turbo will be cheaper and faster than an N/a KAcyrus240sx wrote:yeah id like to see some dynos ... if i could get close to 200 whp with itb's rather than turbo i might even go that route
260whp = larger than stock turbo if it's a high-portInsanityInc wrote:No, it was modded, but only to about 260whp if I recall. I think it may have had different cams. With a turbocharged car, short *** runners are even more important because since you're forcing the air from the turbo to the engine, the less distance to travel the better.
i know.... but a high comp, high revving ITB'd KA would be the coolest thing evar!Nismo_Freak wrote:
Turbo will be cheaper and faster than an N/a KA
1. You won't make 200whp on stock compression 2. You won't make 200whp on stock camshafts
If you are having any second guesses at building a N/a KA then I don't think you are going to be satisfied in the long run. It's one of those things you just build for the sake of building it.