is weight worth hp???

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
wherearemypants
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:08 am
Car: 89-90 240 sx s-13 w/ ka24
Contact:

Post

ok... here's the prob... sr is a little bit more expensive... ca is light... what is better... what are the weights with transmission and everything... i'm buying one or the other very soon, so i wana know what to do... i heard that the ca's sound better too... i have no clue... let me know

thx guys...

---wherearemypants---


User avatar
c-rad
Posts: 2584
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:10 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX w/CA18DET
Contact:

Post

CA and SR weigh about the same.

Kouks
Posts: 763
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 12:32 pm
Car: 1996 Nissan 240sx S14 Sr20det
Location: Jacksonville FL

Post

NO...........The Ca however sounds way different and with a bigger turbo can make just as much power.

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

CA weighs 40 LBS lighter than the SR. But yes weigh will aide in hp.

User avatar
c-rad
Posts: 2584
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:10 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 240SX w/CA18DET
Contact:

Post

The_Chosen_One wrote:CA weighs 40 LBS lighter than the SR. But yes weigh will aide in hp.
Actually, no. Weight has nothing to do with HP. Its all about HP/weight ratio. If a 2800 pound car makes 200whp and you remove 200 pounds of weight, it will still make 200whp.

dekansnowman
Posts: 141
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 7:50 pm
Car: 1995 240SX w/RB25

Post

Yea, we know what you meant. But yea, weight will take away from speed and agility. My exhaust came with an silencer that looks like a giant mug to slide in and out. With it in, it sounds like poop ricer.. With it out..I've had mixed reviews, everything from 'mean for a 1.8' to 'almost like a hayabusa' so I'll let you be the judge after I make a vid.

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

c-rad wrote:
Actually, no. Weight has nothing to do with HP. Its all about HP/weight ratio. If a 2800 pound car makes 200whp and you remove 200 pounds of weight, it will still make 200whp.
you know what I meant douche

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I would not pick a motor based on weight unless the motors in question were a 4AG -vs- a 454 big block. That is a pretty substantial difference. 100 lbs or less, not worth worrying about.

sideways danny
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:29 pm
Car: s13, CA18DET

Post

The_Chosen_One wrote:CA weighs 40 LBS lighter than the SR.
inncorrect. The SR is actually very slightly lighter. there's a thread about it on SXOC somewhere

User avatar
The_Chosen_One
Posts: 1664
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 2:05 pm
Car: 2009 Subaru Impreza 2.5i
Contact:

Post

you sure? Cause of all the articles I've seen when they did weight comparisons, across a lot of Nissan 4 bangers that the CA was lighter by 40 lbs than the SR.

User avatar
iliketocrash
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 5:58 am

Post

i've read that the CA is lighter as well.

sideways danny
Posts: 348
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 2:29 pm
Car: s13, CA18DET

Post


User avatar
iliketocrash
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 5:58 am

Post

well at least it still proves that either way the weight difference between the two is still minimal. and actually even less than what was previously thought.

User avatar
davidricardo86
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:42 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

Well it looks like theyre really not the far apart from each other. I probably would not hold "weight" against either of the two. I say find something else to be picky about. With so many other variables like the parts that still need to be added, the results would probably change a little once again.

This is actually not too surprising because since both engines came in the same car, the S13 Silvia, Nissan probably wanted to keep the weight about the same as to not alter the driving feel or characteristics of the car too much. Just my two cents...

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

R32 Skylines came with RBs or CA18, Z31 fairladys came with VGs or RBs, Nissan doesn't care.

User avatar
davidricardo86
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Sep 14, 2005 7:42 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

themadscientist wrote:R32 Skylines came with RBs or CA18, Z31 fairladys came with VGs or RBs, Nissan doesn't care.
R32 Skylines came with RBs and CAs really? Wow thats something i did not know and THAT surprises me. What version of the CA was it?

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

Correction CA20S for R31 at least

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

redtop91 wrote:Correction CA20S for R31 at least
Corrected correction, CA18i for R32 as well. It's called a GXi. If it came in a two door I would swap a CA18DET in it but they only came four-door. Ah the 8-plug CA, yikes!

Chris859
Posts: 407
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:09 pm
Location: Pinetop, Az

Post

On the weight issue... 40lbs isnt much performance wise. I believe the rule of thumb is - every 100lbs you remove, gives the same performance increase you would get from adding ~10hp. Looking at it this way, a matter of having "4hp" more(which is still less stock hp than an sr)... shouldn't be a deciding factor on which engine to choose. Honestly, I have driven cars with both ca's, and sr's... I love them both equally. I am currently running a ca18, but in the future I might swap to a different engine - who knows. But for now, I am plenty happy with my ca18... On a side note, ca's aren't plagued with a crappy valve train design like sr's.

ca20det
Posts: 209
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 12:34 pm
Car: 89 240sx 93 sentra

Post

IMO if you think 40 pounds isn't much... why then people pay 600$ for carbon fiber hoods, trunk lid fenders, and even more for doors... weight reduction isn't useless..

User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I think at least 80% of the people who buy those do it for style not function which is fine too.

dash
Posts: 579
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 4:07 am
Car: s13 ca18

Post

weight of the hull is a big deal tho.Quickest ca18 on this forum runs only 16-17psi thru an unopened motor.Full weight daily driven rwd toyota starlet. 11.1sec is a tick off a 10sec ride, impressive acceleration for such small input, that you couldn't attain any other way.Same reason why I chose a ca18 as a perfect match for my ae86 rolla.Select your target then copy a combination... eliminate the guesswork

wherearemypants
Posts: 12
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 8:08 am
Car: 89-90 240 sx s-13 w/ ka24
Contact:

Post

here's the deal... motor for motor swap for swap... is the work the same??? is one easier than the other... what about the aftermarket??? i understand that the sr is seriously backd by aftermarket parts... here's what it is

SR20DET Red Top... btw, what is the diff in the black top??? i found that too...$1,895.00 Motors average 35,000 miles and come with a 100% start up warranty.Engine Package Comes With:•Complete Motor•Throttle Body•Transmission 5Spd RWD (with Clutch Assembled to the engine)•Wiring Harness•All required Cables•ECU•Exhaust Manifold•Alternator•Starter•Power Steering Pump•Power Steering High pressure Line•Wastegate solenoid Controller•Wastegate actuator•A/C•Fuel Rail•Injectors•Canistor•Turbo•For Ignitor Chip, Master Air Flow (MAF), Air Cooler, Pipping Please add $595.00 to the total and call for availability. $1,395.00ca18det Motor with the turbo Transmission (5sp) Wiring Harness Cables ECU Cam angle sensor (CAS) Complete Intake Manifold Alternator A/C Power Steering Pump Brackets and Sensors

what else will i need for a ca18swap... with free shipping these prices are pretty good too right???... all help appreciated... i posted nearly the same on the sr forum too with a little diff imput... u guys are awesome thx for the help...

---wherearemypants---

240sxbobbis
Posts: 522
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 3:11 pm
Car: owned a ca18det s13 two of them, jeep wrangler, suzuki gsxr600, 86 mazda rx7, and a y33.
Location: rockville maryland
Contact:

Post

my 2 cents weight is a factor my white car which was gutted out like none other was agile and nifty >>>>>> but now a ghost compared to my new car which is weighted i notice the difference in driving cornering drifting etc not alot but my 2 cents

User avatar
yourmomsrps13
Posts: 472
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 8:33 pm
Car: Drifting ruined my life since 03' 240sx CA18DET

Post

hmm very interesting, my RS*R race springs sit the car up higher with the CA then with the SR, i can only imagine thats from wieght

BACARDI_DWB
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Jul 31, 2006 7:44 am

Post

also from the looks of it the engine sits further back but i may be wrong. the further back the motor sits the "lighter" the front of the car gets.

User avatar
Fenvy
Posts: 5052
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 9:30 am
Car: 2005 350Z Base 6MT

Post

40lb is nothing..... hell I should just lose 40lb

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

40 lbs won't make much of any difference. Weigh under 100lbs as an argument for or against anything in an S is stupid. A full tank of gas for an S weighs close to 100 lbs.

User avatar
Fenvy
Posts: 5052
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2004 9:30 am
Car: 2005 350Z Base 6MT

Post

really? that's heavy. The capacity is around 13 gallon right?

User avatar
redtop91
Posts: 16325
Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2006 9:05 am
Car: ↑ ↑ ↓ ↓ ← → ← → B A Start

Post

Yeppo. I underestimated it at 100 too. I took the weigh of one gallon of distilled water as a baseline of about 8.3 lbs. Since gasoline isn't pure however it probably weighs a bit more but for arguments' sake 8.3 will do. 8.3x13=107.9 lbs


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”