It would ... if people followed it.ishkabibble wrote:But this new revelation is amusing. Yep, that abstinence-only sexual education agenda pushed by the right works really well.
Okay. I realize that I over-reacted - too much reading of other stuff - so I have deleted my response.ishkabibble wrote:Z, the mono thing came from Bristol's schoolmates.
confused...lying takes intellect. This woman is probably the worst thing to happen to women in politics since the hoopskirt.rn79870 wrote:Is she confused or is she lying?
I've got the giggles too. Thank you Sarah.Hash wrote:Excuse me while I go laugh myself into a seizure.
In a thread full of stupid comments, this one wins the prize. Do I really need to explain why these comments are stupid? Because I will if you need me to.skylndrftr wrote:Given that they are basically cancelling the republican convention to try and help the current REPUBLICAN (reminder) president do his job properly...I think they should replace it with the Palin family on Jerry Springer...maybe we'll find out who the real father is to.
call me classless I don't care this dumb bimbo is just to funny.
Speak real slow and use small words.Eikon wrote:
In a thread full of stupid comments, this one wins the prize. Do I really need to explain why these comments are stupid? Because I will if you need me to.
Not as much as you like to follow behind me sniffing for farts.ishkabibble wrote:
Troll much?
Obama wrote:"I have said before, and I will repeat again: People's families are off-limits," Obama said. "And people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as a governor or her potential performance as a vice president. So I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories. You know my mother had me when she was 18, and how a family deals with issues and teenage children, that shouldn’t be a topic of our politics."
That's probably a tale that Bobs mom told him was the cause of his conception.ishkabibble wrote:I never knew mono could make you pregnant!
rn79870 wrote:CNN just announced that Sarah is going to be a grandmother in 4 months. The daughter is 5 months pregnant. Obama is not going to touch that issue. So if you do the math, she couldn't have been the mother of the 4 mth. old. Peyton place, AK.
Well, Bob?szhosain wrote:That site is doing nothing by posturing innuendo and borderline libel. It is not a guarantee of facts and the "logic" is pretty darn flawed. Classic low tactics that are beneath contempt, really.
Finally, if and when it is proven to be false, I will expect apologies. If not, I will apologize.
That scored him some points with me.Eikon wrote:Here's what he has to say about the whole topic. I expect this will now be a dead topic..
This woman advocates abstinence instead of birth control and sex education and insists that it will be just as good at preventing teenage pregnancies. Apparently it isn't, because her UNDERAGE DAUGHTER is now "teen pregnant".Eikon wrote:Palin has done nothing wrong.
My wife, one of the female independent voters that Palin is trying to woo (the wife is much more socially conservative than I am), is absolutely disgusted with Palin's conduct as a mother. No woman with a newborn with down syndrome should be a governor, she needs to be home caring for that child. She's the model of what's wrong with American families, not what's right with them. Kids raising kids, two parents who are busier than they otherwise should be, not because they need the money but just because they have a sense of ambition that overrides their responsibility to their children, et cetera. (note, these are wifey's gripes, not mine, per se).Eikon wrote:How is Palin's daughter an issue? Anyone else have kids? Do they always do what their taught, or do they have poor judgment now and then? Perhaps the work of being a governer has hurt her ability to keep an eye on her kids? How many people posting in this forum waited til marriage to have sex? If so, then I'll allow you to criticize her.
Not so much farts as bull****.audtatious wrote:
Not as much as you like to follow behind me sniffing for farts.
This is what happens when you preach morality, no sex education in schools, no contraception, anti abortion, anti gay, anti woman, etc and try to legislate those views into law and force it upon the entire population.Eikon wrote:This has to be the worst thread in the history of NICOclub.
It's so full of fail I can hardly read it.
Someone explain to me why this woman's family, pregnancies, and other personal details are on the forefront of concern. Last time we have personal scandal like this it was Bill Clinton, and he actually did something wrong. Palin has done nothing wrong. It's pretty sad that our country can't handle a female candidate w/out going straight to personal issues.
How is Palin's daughter an issue? Anyone else have kids? Do they always do what their taught, or do they have poor judgment now and then? Perhaps the work of being a governer has hurt her ability to keep an eye on her kids? How many people posting in this forum waited til marriage to have sex? If so, then I'll allow you to criticize her.
Bob, Your posts about Palin's governing are terribly mis-quoted. You're quickly losing your credibility on this forum by taking such a blind stance and abusing the context of quotes and facts.
I will have to take your word for it that my farts smell like bull****ishkabibble wrote:
Not so much farts as bull****.
Or you can expect those of us 'lefties' that criticized Clinton about his scandal to criticize her if she is lying as well...AZhitman wrote:BTW, lying to the American public about something in your private life was made OK by the last Democrat President, so I expect all you lefties to defend her right to lie. Go ahead.
Or, argue with me. Go ahead. Bring it.
I had not seen that. Thanks for the link!ishkabibble wrote:Mrs. Palin actually supports contraception:
http://dwb.adn.com/news/politi....html
As I said, I was quoting my wife's personal opinions on the matter. She just thought it was a little much for *anyone* to be back at work within 2 days of giving birth to a special needs child. I don't really feel strongly about the issue of either the down syndrome kid or the teen pregnancy (other than that the latter looks bad, at least to a good portion of the population, and I stand by that).AZhitman wrote:Hash, I disagree strongly with most of that post...
First of all, people's parenting styles are their own business. To claim "OMG abstinence education don't werk becuz teh Palin kid got prego" is retarded.
Second, you may as well say she should be home baking cookies "where she belongs". Having a special-needs kid shouldn't deprive the populace of her efforts and service. Take all the workers with special needs kids out of the workforce and we have a mess.
Daughters behavior is NOT irrelevant. I know it's not a *real* material issue, but in elections, unfortunately, PERCEPTION MATTERS. It WILL be a turn-off to certain voters, even if it wouldn't necessarily be a turn-off to you or I.AZhitman wrote:Third, your list of reiterations is not terribly relevant. Obama's choice got booed as well, but a shxt-ton of Hillarious supporters. Daughter's behavior is irrelevant... She's not the Prez, and her Iraq comment was way outta context, and "troopergate" is a fabricated non-issue... Perhaps you could read up on it. I posted about it days ago and why she did the right thing.
Romney was vetted, effectively, by the primary process and thus he would've had fewer surprises, as would any other major figure (Lieberman) who had been through a national campaign of any kind. That doesn't, by it's own virtue, make him a better pick, but I doubt McCain would've lost 6 points over the weekend if he'd gone with Romney, he'd likely still be even-Steven.AZhitman wrote:Romney had some issues that the dems would have picked up on as well - No one is immune and you know it.
I admit that six points at this stage in the game doesn't mean much (if anything) to the final result, but what it DOES mean, indisputably, is that Sarah Palin has had a negative impact, at least in the here and now, on how McCain's ticket is being perceived by the public. Nothing else happened since those two polls were taken, and so it must be inferred that McCain lost six points BECAUSE OF SARAH PALIN. I'm open to other suggestions, but I don't see any plausible ones.AZhitman wrote:Six points doesn't phase me, just like Camp Llama didn't panic when they lost a 9-point lead in Gallup's polling.
For the reasons above, I disagree.AZhitman wrote:A very rare weak post from you, good friend.
Barrack Obama wrote:"Let me be as clear as possible," Obama said. "I think people's families are off-limits, and people's children are especially off-limits. This shouldn't be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Gov. Palin's performance as governor or her potential performance as a vice president."
