Irony at work

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
themadscientist
Posts: 26254
Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2002 3:30 pm
Car: R32 GTR, DR30 RS Turbo, BRZ, Lunchbox, NSR50 Sportster 883 Iron
Location: Staring down at you with disdain from the spooky mountaintop castle.

Post

I'm overweight. It's not genetic. It's called hohos and RC cola. Don't shed a tear for me.


User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

nissangirl74 wrote:
Encryptshun wrote:Actually, crappy, unhealthy food is way less expensive than healthy food. So the less money someone has the more likely they are to get (or remain) fat. Until such time as they are literally starving to death.

edited
A head of lettuce costs less than a bag of potato chips.

A head of iceberg lettuce, sure. But what other fresh produce could you buy for less than the cost of an equivalent weight of junk food (when you can get a pack of hot dogs on sale for a buck and a bag of chips for 99 cents)? Plus you still need protein and some amount of fat to live. You can go to McDonald's and get a 5,000 calorie meal for under 6 bucks. How much would an equivalent caloric intake of healthy food cost?

Also, you are assuming that all people have access to fresh produce in the first place. So-called "food deserts" are becoming increasingly common in urban areas (which happen to also contain that highest density of people who live below the poverty line and individuals on public assistance programs). In these places, where people don't necessarily have access to transportation, getting to a grocery store to buy that head of lettuce could cost you up to 5 times what the head of lettuce costs. Local businesses have zero incentive to sell fresh fruits and vegetables because they have relatively small shelf life and they are unable to find distributors to sell to them on such a small scale, so they instead stock up on what does sell -- junk food, alcohol, and maybe a few less-perishable staples such as bread.

The problem with the argument that "if there's enough demand, the stores will change what they carry" is that the stores end up defining the culture which reduces the likelihood of advocacy for changing the products. Example, tofu and edemame are both incredibly good for you and excellent meat-replacements. But just try getting my mom or grandparents to give up their red meat in favor of something that looks like a bar of soap. So therefore try finding tofu or edemame in any of the grocery stores around where they live (rural Missouri).

So the net net is that we have a junk-food culture driven and sustained by very slick, very targeted marketing and allowed to perpituate through ignorance, poverty, and apathy. Sooner or later, we need to move past the "well, it doesn't affect me, so I'm not going to worry about it" conservative attitude (and if you think that politicians aren't paid by the junk food industry to tell you that nothing is wrong and don't worry about it then you need to go work for a company that sells junk food).

That latter isn't directed at you, Bex -- just a general statement about how a growing percentage of our population assesses priorities.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

Encryptshun wrote:A head of iceberg lettuce, sure. But what other fresh produce could you buy for less than the cost of an equivalent weight of junk food (when you can get a pack of hot dogs on sale for a buck and a bag of chips for 99 cents)? Plus you still need protein and some amount of fat to live. You can go to McDonald's and get a 5,000 calorie meal for under 6 bucks. How much would an equivalent caloric intake of healthy food cost?

Also, you are assuming that all people have access to fresh produce in the first place. So-called "food deserts" are becoming increasingly common in urban areas (which happen to also contain that highest density of people who live below the poverty line and individuals on public assistance programs). In these places, where people don't necessarily have access to transportation, getting to a grocery store to buy that head of lettuce could cost you up to 5 times what the head of lettuce costs. Local businesses have zero incentive to sell fresh fruits and vegetables because they have relatively small shelf life and they are unable to find distributors to sell to them on such a small scale, so they instead stock up on what does sell -- junk food, alcohol, and maybe a few less-perishable staples such as bread.

The problem with the argument that "if there's enough demand, the stores will change what they carry" is that the stores end up defining the culture which reduces the likelihood of advocacy for changing the products. Example, tofu and edemame are both incredibly good for you and excellent meat-replacements. But just try getting my mom or grandparents to give up their red meat in favor of something that looks like a bar of soap. So therefore try finding tofu or edemame in any of the grocery stores around where they live (rural Missouri).

So the net net is that we have a junk-food culture driven and sustained by very slick, very targeted marketing and allowed to perpituate through ignorance, poverty, and apathy. Sooner or later, we need to move past the "well, it doesn't affect me, so I'm not going to worry about it" conservative attitude (and if you think that politicians aren't paid by the junk food industry to tell you that nothing is wrong and don't worry about it then you need to go work for a company that sells junk food).

That latter isn't directed at you, Bex -- just a general statement about how a growing percentage of our population assesses priorities.
Mo sides taken here. There is someone to blame at every level of our 'obesity epidemic.' first, the statement about a head of lettuce being cheaper than a bag of chips. Correct. But lets disect that statement a step further. Something that aggravates me to no end is that a bag of chips (which is roughly 2-2.5 potatoes) is cheaper than 2 potatoes. This gets under my skin for a few reasons.
1. That potato grown to make the chips probably came from another country. Discount labor, but add cost for transportation (not to mention the environmental impact, but I digress, this is about food cost).
2. Potatoes meant for the chips is mechanically washed, peeled, sliced, dried, fried, packaged, shipped and slotted on a grocery store shelf ALL before it gets to your home. There is a cost associated with each and every step of the processing! Not to mention the labor involved.
3. Finished good is sold for $0.99 - $1.49. Finished good takes more time and steps to harvest, process, and sell and somehow STILL costs less to purchase than the equiliviant amount of raw potato from the produce section. Inexcusable.
4. (f*** me, I work in food processing).

Regarding the trends and deserts- Chad has an excellent point about the less desirable neighborhoods having poor access to fruits and vegetables. Especially when the worse food is cheaper. Some additional thoughts I have are that not everyone that is in the region becomes associated with becoming overweight. Just those who aren't active AND/OR working the type of labor/employment associated with their socioeconomic status. Which is; mother with 3+ kids, the children themselves, and the folks who sit on their bums and speak about the man keeping them down (aka, MOST of the population of the impoverished area). The father, on the other hand, typically works a labor intensive job and isn't (or isn't as) overweight as the rest of the family. For him (or her) the trade off for 5,000 calories from a $6 value meal is a superb deal. Calories in --> calories out. For this person, the cost of the meal is a plus, but it is also survival- given that the availability of the proper nourishment is limited.

I agree that demand is suited by the stores in the area, but from the business owners point of view, the profit margin on soda, candy, and chips is greater than the fruit, veg, etc which, as mentioned, have a shorter shelf life. I may be an idealist, but I believe that if pressured by competition such as a new local grocer who carries limited variety of lower cost produce (apples, oranges, bananas, juice and romaine instead of plums, peaches, soda and spring mix), those unfortunate folks who WANT those goods will find you. While business may be slow to start, I'd bet that it picks up and so long as you're also selling lottery tickets and beer, you'll start to gain market share from the junk food riddled convenience store which (I would hope) causes competition and more availability and competition within the region.

But, this is all speculation. Those large companies who dominate the convenience store shelves and the restaurant soda fountains have deep pockets for lobbying in their favor. Their organization is far superior to the collation of produce (if there is such a thing). In order to turn this into a solution, the people need to be educated, and with that, the resources have to be available. Unfortunately, in these areas, education is in short supply and that becomes a whole different conversation about fear of authority, etc. lets bring this back to food though- the problem isn't just in the areas mentioned. As noted in the original topic, "privileged" folk have a perception that 'eating fat' is cool, too. There are changes all around the board that need to be made. Unfortunately, its gotten so unruly that the federal and state governments are considering 'sugar taxes' on beverages. The argument of "big brother always watching me, tellin' me what to do" then arises, but then those same folk will still complain about being overweight and obese which puts a HUGE burden on our medical costs, well, for those of use who take pride in our good standing health anyway. Its not as if being healthy, eating properly, or exercising is actually difficult, its just fallen out of prospective. Its equiliviated to "work." Again, inexcusable. If you HAVE to eat, might as well be good for you, if you HAVE to exercise, go hike some mountains and enjoy it, or row a boat, f***, even fish burns more calories than channel surfing. Again, this all boils down to education and a new message. Its just not there...

And I'm out of breath from arguing for the moment except: "Nigga what the FV CK is JUICE?! I want that purple stuff. Sugar, water, purple. Thats the ingredients."

User avatar
audtatious
Moderator
Posts: 25014
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 5:31 pm
Car: 2017 Q60 Red Sport. Gone: 2014 Q50s, 2008 G37s coupe, 2007 G35s Sedan, 2002 Maxima SE, 2000 Villager Estate (Quest), 1998 Quest, 1996 Sentra GXE
Location: Stalking You
Contact:

Post

PapaSmurf2k3 wrote:Yeah but you're not that fat dude... unless you've gained a lot since the last time I saw you.
I had only just quit smoking at that point, I've gained since then :(

User avatar
hannibal
Posts: 9680
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2002 2:38 am
Car: Red Line to Glenmont
Location: Washington DC

Post

Encryptshun wrote:Actually, crappy, unhealthy food is way less expensive than healthy food. So the less money someone has the more likely they are to get (or remain) fat. Until such time as they are literally starving to death.

edited
Check out a documentary called Food Inc.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1286537/

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

I lol'd at this thread.

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

Kinda want a huge burger right about now.

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

damn you subliminal advertisment!

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

Image

User avatar
carloslebaron
Posts: 307
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 4:51 pm
Car: 95 Nissan pickup XE

Post

dasoupdude wrote:Image
Those girls can feed me all day long..full service please...

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

^^ Daaaaaam... Thats a nice.. cheeseburger.

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

alms24sebring wrote:^^ Daaaaaam... Thats a nice.. cheeseburger.

I prefer seeing the milk shake.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

<-- 41 years old. Raised poor. Not fat.

All the excuse-making is just noise generated for political gain.

McDonald's isn't the only choice for cheap food. Last I checked, you can buy five bigass cans of Campbell's Beef Stew for the cost of that McFatty Combo Meal.

Too lazy to microwave it? Eat it cold.

The REAL problem is it doesn't taste as good as the #4 Double Assload Combo, now, does it, Chubs? :poke:

How many of those people who claim they're "too poor to eat healthy" have been to their local church's food bank? I've volunteered at ours, and there's some seriously awesome chow being handed out... all you gotta do is drag your butt off the couch and stroll down there.

So, I'm not buying into the pathetic, weepy, sympathymongering of people who can't control their own impulses and scarf down crap that's bad for them. Quit believing the lies.

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

^ The conservative argument, ladies and gentlemen. *golfclap*

User avatar
alms24sebring
Posts: 7332
Joined: Wed Nov 15, 2006 12:18 am
Car: '97 Nissan 240sx. First Nissan. First love. Sold.
'04 Nissan Sentra SER SpecV
Location: Alexandria VA

Post

I went to WakAranolds the other day and got 2 McChickens, a doublecheeseburger, and a 4 pc nugget for $4.20 :)

That is very true tho. Cheap food does not mean bad food. All pasta is is flour, an egg or 2 and water, thats it! A jar of sauce for $1.50 and that lunch and dinner.

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

This thread has now drifted off the topic of hotties in nurses uniforms serving you plates full of tasty murder.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Encryptshun wrote:^ The logical/rational argument, ladies and gentlemen. *golfclap*
ftfy. ;)

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Encryptshun wrote:This thread has now drifted off the topic of hotties in nurses uniforms serving you plates full of tasty murder.
Fix it. FIX IT NAO! :ohno:

:dblthumb:

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

am i doing it right?

Image

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:
Encryptshun wrote:^ The tokenistic, rhetorical argument, ladies and gentlemen. *golfclap*
ftfy. ;)
ftfY. ;)

Luz you, Greg-buddy. :)

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

numbnuts240 wrote:am i doing it right?
ban.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

aww c'mooooon. i bet that dude gives awesome mustache rides.

User avatar
nissangirl74
Moderator
Posts: 13910
Joined: Sat Jan 17, 2009 1:15 pm
Car: 2014 Xterra Pro4X, '12 Titan 4x4, '98 240sx, '89 Pao, '77 620, '72 240Z w/RB25, '68 510, '67 WRL411, '67.5 SPL 311, '63 Bluebird, '63 NL320

Post

man card revoked

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

really? just now?

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

Did Tito have a man card in the first place?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Traded it for a green card. Fair deal.

User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

AZhitman wrote:Traded it for a green card. Fair deal.
:bowrofl: i just hurt myself laughing so hard.

User avatar
Encryptshun
Posts: 11309
Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2007 7:48 am
Car: 2005 Nissan Xterra
Location: Outside Chicago
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:Traded it for a green card. Fair deal.
:rotfl :rotfl :rotfl

User avatar
s13coupe1991
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:46 pm
Car: 1991 240sx coupe

Post

dasoupdude wrote:Image
You know youre fat when you see this and get hungry for those hamburgers. I would be asking for something else to eat. :naughty: :mike

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

numbnuts240 wrote:am i doing it right?

Image
:rotfl :rotfl :rotfl


Return to “General Chat”