MinisterofDOOM wrote:Yeah, there are tons of them. They're called web browsers.
I've never understood the demand for smartphone apps for web forums. Smartphones are designed with web browsing as a central function. An Android forum app makes as much sense as a Windows forum app.
Tapatalk is clunky and awkward, and feels like it was designed for past generations of smart phones with tiny, low-res screens and limited memory. But anything capable of running tapatalk can also run Opera Mobile, or Dolphin HD, or even Chrome, all of which work far better than any forum-purposed app.
We've discussed the primary reason for not allowing tapatalk access already. Security concerns.
But I disagree with your assessment that forum apps make no sense on phones. Browsing on a phone is a whole lot more cumbersome than browsing on a PC. A 10 inch tablet is also a ton easier than a phone. Unless you have stylus sized fingers and magnifying glass eyes, its not easier to view a full browser page on typical websites on a ~4 inch screen. Sure you can zoom, but the primary purpose for a forum from a user perspective is to read threads. An app (perhaps even a web page) that allows one to see just the body of the threads makes a huge difference. I can't speak for Tapatalk personally, but I do use the Phandroid app on my phone to view android forum threads (and also the news section). I can get to the forums I have saved as favorites quite quickly and I don't have to struggle in trying to press on links or zoom in to read the contents. I don't use the app for the sake of using the app though. I use the stock browser on my Android tablet.
As for Windows not having an app for forums, it makes no sense because relatively few Windows devices have touchscreens. I have a convertible tablet and browsing by finger touch is not ideal mainly because browsers aren't really optimized for it. But readability and finger size is less of an issue than on a phone. But when I'm in tablet mode, I usually have my stylus in hand so its usually not that big of a deal. My android tablet is pretty acceptable because of Samsung's modification to the stock browser's interface.
Ultimately, most people are going to use phones more like they might use a tablet than they would a PC. Tablets and phones will be used much more as consumption devices rather than productivity devices. Anything that streamlines a particular process will likely be favored more than the alternatives. Which is why I use apps to browse news articles rather than using the browser. And why I would type a response this long from a PC rather than my phone or tablet.
Lastly, another consideration for an app over a browser may be data limits and throttling. Those who don't have unlimited data plans may be more concerned about minimizing data. Before I moved close enough to school to ride a bike, I was easily going over 2GB each month (which has become the limit for AT&T and VZW). This was primarily from using Pandora. With the likelihood that unlimited plans are not going to be as commonplace in the future, all applications and websites are going to be competing to some extent with each other for each consumer's bandwidth allotment. I'm not sure how big of an issue this is overall but none of the major carriers have unlimited data for new business anymore. Even then, AT&T is throttling data if a threshold is crossed. Verizon's doing so when necessary on 3G connections (4G will probably follow when it becomes more widely used). That said, minimizing the amount of data transferred at all times reduces the chance of getting to the point of being throttled and makes it easier to get the same data across a slower connection.