Well DC was number one, and gun were outlawed until just recently, so I'm gonna go with a negative correlation.rn79870 wrote:I wonder how those numbers relate fo CCP's in each of those states?
Bob,I think your list includes criminals using firearms to kill people (violent crime) instead of accidental deaths. I think 96QOwner's list was for accidental deaths. Your two sets of numbers are totally unrelated.budrn79870 wrote:I wonder how those numbers relate fo CCP's in each of those states?
It seems that a good number of those 500 kids who were killed and the 2500 who were injured had access to unsupervised activity with a gun. Had those guns been locked safely...rn wrote:Unintentional fire arm deaths occur mainly in young children. About 500 children die each year in the U.S. from "accidental" shootings and at least 5 times as many are wounded.
I dont believe that I disagreed with you on the premise of storing firearms safely. What I disagreed with, in that arguement was:1. Federal regulations to mandate that people do so.2. Federal regulations on how to do so.budrn79870 wrote:I posted in another thread that I believed guns should be stored, as you do with yours Bud, in a safe or with a locking device on the trigger. Yet some people found fault with my belief, some even suggesting that it was yet another attempt to remove guns from the public.
It seems that a good number of those 500 kids who were killed and the 2500 who were injured had access to unsupervised activity with a gun. Had those guns been locked safely...
To those of you who safely store your firearms between uses, ---
Besides, Federal regulations, mandates and instructions for storing poisons would be 16 times more effective, according to the list of causes of death. First things first, eh?Cold_Zero wrote:
I dont believe that I disagreed with you on the premise of storing firearms safely. What I disagreed with, in that arguement was:1. Federal regulations to mandate that people do so.2. Federal regulations on how to do so.bud
Hitman supports the "parents who don't like there kids lobby"AZhitman wrote:They don't take into account the diverse and varied family situations or differences in household arrangements.
Sorry I wasn't more clear. I was referring to safety devices other than the safety on a gun. Like trigger locks or locking up guns. (my bad at 'spressing thinks).Marenta wrote:Do you know what a safety really consists of?
A lever.. or a button. My child was playing with levers and buttons when he was 1. I'm sure a child a bit older could figure a lever or button out.
There are other safeties which are a bit more odd and require more finesse, like the spoon grip and the trigger guard and stuff like that, which would work a bit better in the case of a child.
I think the majority of it has to do with Socio Economic Status of the states and how crime is fought, rather than political affiliation. The majority of the top 15 states are states with higher levels of poverty.#1 District of Columbia: 31.2 #2 Alaska: 20 #3 Louisiana: 19.5 #4 Wyoming: 18.8 #5 Arizona: 18 #6 Mississippi: 17.3 #7 Nevada: 17.3 #8 New Mexico: 16.6 #9 Arkansas: 16.3 #10 Alabama: 16.2 #11 Tennessee: 15.4 #12 West Virginia: 14.7 #13 Montana: 14.5 #14 South Carolina: 13.8 #15 North Carolina: 13.6skylndrftr wrote:and on rn's point, unless I am mistaken 8 of the 10 states with highest gun death rates are republican. so much for personal responsiblity
Government regulations aren't to thank for airbags. Consumer interest is the driving force behind safety innovations. Some good things CAN come about without the influence of "Big Guv", contrary to many people's beliefs.skylndrftr wrote: You guys reject government regulations, well remember that when your airbag goes off while you hit a guardrail as opposed to a 3000ft drop into a canyon.
and on rn's point, unless I am mistaken 8 of the 10 states with highest gun death rates are republican. so much for personal responsiblity
skylndrftr wrote:thats a much better correlation bud thank you. Might want to point out in addidtion to yorus that Alaska Wyoming Arizona and New Mexico all have high populations of American Indians. Those groups tend to have serious poverty problems and VERY high suicide rates.
Weird, because those 3 are sitting right about in the middle.. 21-25 range.. odd. I wonder how that happened.Cold_Zero wrote:I am surprised that Indiana did not come up in the top 15. We have some of the looses gun laws. Georgia, Florida and Virginia as well.
More or less.AZhitman wrote:Do states cast a ballot?
Already exists... Although tightening it up even further could certainly help, and I'd not oppose it.rn79870 wrote:Another idea.Instead of governmental intervention as far as safe storage of guns, would anyone support a form of strict liability for gun owners? That is, each owner is responsible for any damage/injury caused by his/her gun whether or not he/she caused it. IE, a 5 year old gets possession of a gun and shoots it, hitting a passing motorist. The owner would be responsible in civil court just as if he had shot the motorist? Thoughts?
Airbags were made law in 1984 so that they were required as of 1990. Ford and Chevy didnt introduce airbags until the 1984 model year.AZhitman wrote:Government regulations aren't to thank for airbags.
Moving from 5 to 46 in a couple weeks makes me feel much safer.AZhitman wrote: A state traditionally votes a certain way, or is led by a governor who is affiliated with a certain party.
Did I ever show you guys my statistical analysis that showed that breathing air is the leading ultimate cause of death? And no one talks about it?96Qowner wrote:I always find these lists fascinating
Again, I think that your attempt to 'hold gun owners MORE accountable' is focused on the wrong section of people. Instead of penalizing gun owners that have had their weapons stolen, why not first penalize anyone who uses a firearm in the course of a crime? Throw the book at them! But hey, this is not a new idea that I am advocating. Apparently the great State of Virginia already does this through Project Exile.See, this is what I resent about politicians. They get together, pass a few laws, pat themselves on the back and say, "We just fought crime." No jails were built in the course of their legislation to relieve overcrowding, more cops were not put on the streets to enforce the existing or new law, there are probably already the same law on the books that are not being enforced and 'No Truth in Sentencing' laws are even passed to keep criminals in jail for their entire sentence! Why not first go after the criminals. Then we can talk about gun owners that shrug their responsibility.rn79870 wrote:Another idea.Instead of governmental intervention as far as safe storage of guns, would anyone support a form of strict liability for gun owners? That is, each owner is responsible for any damage/injury caused by his/her gun whether or not he/she caused it. IE, a 5 year old gets possession of a gun and shoots it, hitting a passing motorist. The owner would be responsible in civil court just as if he had shot the motorist? Thoughts?
Sounds to me like your saying that unborn children aren't people...does that invalidate the arguement against abortion?szhosain wrote:There is also 100% correlation between breathing air and all forms of cancer and heart disease, etc., etc., etc.