adidas2go wrote:Haha I knew this would piss someone off, but in all honestly they are just theories. I don't go to every company and see them dyno everything. However, I have personally been a part of borla's dyno process and they did just that. Also with my last turbo car, my eclipse, the shop that did all the dyno testing was set up in that EXACT same perspective. I'm not saying every company does this, I was refering to certain speculatory companies that pony up 55 hp and 33mpg from drop in mods, cough *turbonator* cough . Sure it might just be them, but I dont know. I didn't blame STILLEN for any of this, or Injen. I know you guys do true testing, I have full faith in STILLEN. But I found it kind of hard to believe, when I called Injen and asked them where they got those dyno numbers from, they had used a 3.5 CVT. Knowing what we know about CVT and dyno's, just found it kinda shady
As for the speed difference, It doesn't make sense to gain 15 mph in the quarter, and there could have been many factors that played in, but this is what I saw, I could be crazy. Don't be mad at me Kyle, I posted this when I was on the aircraft carrier, working 14 hours a day for 21 days straight, I was a bit pissed off at the world
Gaining 15 MPH in the 1/4 mile by putting back the stock intake? That means with the INJEN, your car lost 80 WHP.
If a car goes from 100 MPH in the 1/4 to 115 MPH in the 1/4, you have just gained 100 WHP.
I noticed the stock intake gives you better low end torque then the WAI's out there, but they WAI's still give you better top end power. My husband dynoed 244 WHP with the Fujita.
And do you guys want a solutation your WAI problems? Here is it:
http://www.jkgracing.com/aemcoairin07.html