vballer22 wrote:
Hey robert, what would you say are the big differences between the 3sixty.1 and .2? Ive heard the .2 is absolutely amazing, but I havnt had a chance to compare yet. I'm still running on the cleansweep and I love it so much I'm a little wary of trying anything else unless I get it free from my audio shop again.
Well I own the jl audio and I did a test for my audio shop of the 3sixty.1 and I loved it. The sound quality was pretty much the same in terms of improvement over stock, but my phone is a palm centro, and the rockford fosgate is controlled by palm devices. It was so cool! so the 3sixty.1 scored some major points on that, but both processors do the same thing and are hidden after the install, so just get whichever you get a better deal on.
Well, this is the thing about the 3sixty.1... when hooked up to OEM systems, Rockford has had A LOT of complaints above interference and engine noise coming through on the system. NOw there could be a number of reasons for this, but I beleive a lot of it has to do with folks using poorly shielded CHEAP RCA's with their setups, that combined with running the RCA's down the same side of the car as their 0/1 Gauge power wire. The combination of the two is sure to cause some interference (I must say that I've also heard some folks having interference with the cleanweep)
Regarding the 3sixty.2, its just bananas.
Here. read this and you can see what folks are saying about comparsions between the 3sixty and the cleansweep
http://www.bimmerfest.com/foru...64369
Read this for comparisons between 3sixty.1 and 3sixty.2.. the main difference is in crossover and EQ adjustments!
http://www.rockfordfosgate.com...06187)
ALso, the reason there are less folks complaining about interference with the 3sixty.2 may have to do with the fact that most folks that buy that unit are LESS LIKELY to go el cheapo on the RCA cables, and are most likely to have their install done properly!