import-autoperformance?

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
Jimmyg41
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:02 pm

Post

f1seb wrote:DOH! I just noticed. LOL. Was wondering why everybody was askign about the Delta waste gate when on their website it says they use the Tial.


It was about a month ago that they stopped using those delta wastegates. I just bought the tial wastegate off them and downpipe since I have their manifold.


IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

OP240sx wrote:So, has anyone installed the kit yet or even the manifold? If so, how is it working out?

Also, when the wastegate opens to atmosphere, how loud is that? Is that legal to dump the exhaust without going through the cats?

Can the dump pipe be routed back into the exhaust?

Thanks.


I have experience with two of their manifolds now. The first one I installed about 3 or 4 months ago. The welds were horrible. They were MIG welded and not TIG welded. The fitment was horrible. The hole in the collector where the dump to WG was attached was only opened to less then the size of a quarter. I did my best to port that area to try to keep boost creep down. Making a DP for the placement of the turbo just plain sucked as the turbine housing was right on the brake master cylinder. After getting the car started, all of the "heat coating" burned off in about two minutes at idle. Once it was running on my dyno it had HORRIBLE boost creep. Boost came on and hit 8 psi and slowly rose to 9 psi till about 4500 rpms where it went from 9 psi to 18 psi by the time it hit 5500 rpms. I took the manifold off and re did the dump to WG with larger tubing (from IAP it was just over an inch and I used 1.5" tubing) and this took care of the boost creep. While I had the manifold off to fix the problems with the dump to WG I noticed that the carbon marks on the manifold looked weird. I investigated further and found that they had welded the flange on upside down. I put the car back together and finished dynoing the car even with the upside down flange (at the request of the customer) and he took the car back to remove the manifold and send it back to IAP for their "new and improved" manifold.

The second of their manifolds I installed was finished up and given back to the customer yesterday. This car was supposed to be put together right after the first one but after seeing the problems with the first manifold, I checked out the second one and found the same problems (small dump to WG, crappy welds, flange on upside down) I called IAP and asked what was going on over there and they said they have never had boost creep problems and that the flange "might" have gotten put on wrong but they had their "NEW" manifold and that both my customers could trade them in if they wanted so this second one was sent back for the new and improved version.

The "NEW" manifold that I installed last week was really not much better then the first. The welds are STILL MIG and are really crappy. This manifold wouldn't even go over the studs on the head until I slotted a couple holes. Again the "heat coating" burned off in about two minutes of idling. At least they upgraded the dump to WG tube size and got the flange on right side up this time.

Another note: The IAP manifold is NOT equal lenght.

This customer had installed most of the kit and just wanted me to finish things up and get the car started.

For this kit, I had the unpleasant experience of dealing with the IAP intercooler kit. This honestly has to be the worst craftsmanship I have ever seen. The BOV flange was mounted INTO the IC piping blocking off at LEAST 1/3 of the pipe and when you consider that the IC piping was only 2", that makes for some serious restriction to flow. The welds were some of the worst I have ever seen. The vacuum fitting on the cold side pipe near the TB actually only had weld gobbed to the fitting and none on the IC pipe. It hissed like a cat when we started the car. That same pipe was so long and small that it actually went INTO the TB and hit the throttle plate keeping it from opening more then 1/3.

This customer was trying to keep his money investment down so unfortunately, I didn't get to fix all the issues with his car or even get to dyno it.

The only good thing to come out of the IAP manifold, is that other people are now working on QUALITY manifolds that in the long run will save people money and aggravation.

I would not recommend this manifold to anybody.

I am not trying to bash IAP just stating MY experiences with this manifold as was asked.

I know that some of you will see this as me trying to bad mouth a competitor but this is the truth and can be backed up by the customers and with pictures that I have taken to document what I experienced.

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

Hmmm, I dont know why you had such problems, the manifold went on perfectly fine for me, no slotting necessary, the welds were more than sufficient (frankly I couldn't give two ****s about mig vs. tig, either one is strong enough and looks arent my thing), the heat coating on mine is doing just fine, the flanges mate up perfectly with everything, and downpipe routing was simple enough considering I had a GOOD exhaust shop do it. I dont know what your doing to those mani's your getting, but I've only seen one of the problems you spoke of and its since been rectified, the opening to the WG dump did indeed need some opening up. Also, I measured the manifold myself, with a good ol' sewing ruler and all the runners were within 1/2 in. of equal length, which could easily have been due to operator error.

Edit, I cant speak for their intercooler kit, I dont have it. The pictures I've seen looked just fine but they were just pictures, no firsthand experience.

OP240sx
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 7:55 am

Post

Just the kind of replies potential customers are looking for. People who have actual experience with the product(s), not just the person selling it. ;) As with anything new, kinks have to be worked out, and it looks like some really like it.

I might just go with the Real Nissan one as I don't really like the WG dumping to the atmosphere anyway. :(

Custom setup, here I come. :pface

User avatar
f1seb
Posts: 1299
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2002 5:15 am

Post

and I was really looking forward to buying that kit.

:(

Now what?

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

Nathan wrote:Edit, I cant speak for their intercooler kit, I dont have it. The pictures I've seen looked just fine but they were just pictures, no firsthand experience.


Here are some more pictures to view

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post


IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post


IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

The old addage "you get what you pay for" seems to apply quite well here.

I feel the design and fabrication of this manifold and intercooler are very bad at best.

You be the judge

OP240sx
Posts: 32
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2004 7:55 am

Post

Wow, not much room for airflow in that intercooler pipe. :confused:

I don't know the first thing about welding, but those look pretty bad compared to others I've seen. Maybe it was Friday aftenoon and payday when these were done.

:(

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

I had the same problems with the heat coating peeling off. It looks like butt, because that coating won't stop peeling. And, yes, I had the boost creep problems too. I hit 16psi on the run that blew my engine.

Thank you IAP, because of you guys I am going to have to rebuild my engine.

curt

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Hmm...I don't understand. I just got my KAE (sohc) maifold from them last week and it looks great. I haven't put it on or tested it yet, but it'll be a month or 2 before I do. Granted I think Marc just sprays that high heat engine paint on the manifolds, which everyone knows will chip because that paint only goes to 1200 degrees, but oh well. As for the welds in those pics, I don't know what's up there. On my mani you couldn't ask for better welds. All of them look like dimes staggered stacked. If you know anything about welds then you want a nice wave on each one, making it look like stacked coins. I'm sure Marc will get on here and let everyone know what's up.

Gofast1
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 6:47 pm
Car: 1995 & 1996 240SX
Contact:

Post

Sorry it took me so long guys, like Nathan said, I didn't know this post was alive and kicking.

Ivan, I would love to know about all these 'problems' you are having with our stuff since you and I talked one time about an issue that was resolved months ago. I think it's incredibly poor taste to trash another vendor on an public forum right after you have released a product in direct competition with us.

Let me address this nonsense. I don't know what pictures you have of intercooler piping there, but it isn't ours, ours doesn't look anything like that. Also, as ANYONE who has dealt with us can attest, IF there had been a problem, it would have been fixed. We even pay shipping both ways if there is an issue with one of our products. So I am sorry but I have to call BS on this one bud.:bsflag

The WG problem you are speaking of has been addressed, is gone, has been gone and you know it. By the way all of our manis are now TIG welded and have been for over 7 months, I am not even going to go into that because it has beaten to death on this thread and others.

Also Ivan, the manifold you are speaking of where the coating came off, and you know the one I mean, came off for one reason. By your customer's own lips:

"Marc, the coating is peeling because I spilled some oil onto two fo the runners, will this create a problem with the warranty?"

No, it doesn't. We warranty it anyway. But in manufacturing, as you well know Ivan, you can't run across many coatings that will withstand 1000+ degrees and motor oil. Not unless you own a half million dollar booth.

Curt,

Sorry about your motor bud, but blame someone else since all you have ever purchased from us is an S13 downpipe, NOT a manifold, so please be sure someone you are bashing for no reason doesn't keep detailed records of transactions.

Sorry for the slight rant there guys, but I don't disparage people or products without knowing the full story and I don't appreciate it done to me.

I had a chance to take a couple guys from this board for a ride in our Stage 2 car this week, one of them is a moderator. I got nothing but great feedback from both of them on how much power the car makes, how fast it spools up and how sturdy the engine is.

We don't need to bash anyone, our products speak for themselves in both performance and durability.

If anyone has any issues they would like to discuss I encourage all legitimate feedback either voice or email, and we would be happy to address concerns.

Thanks again to all of the people who support us and know that we stand behind all of products!

Marc

C.s240
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2002 4:00 pm
Car: tunning

Post

"I had a chance to take a couple guys from this board for a ride in our Stage 2 car this week, one of them is a moderator. I got nothing but great feedback from both of them on how much power the car makes, how fast it spools up and how sturdy the engine is."

One of them would be me.. i even put a Diff in his car for him just cuase i told him i would do him the favor .. and the stage 2 cars is awsome and insane i had a blast just them couple of rides i got in it.. i have a KA turbo also and by no means its as fast as theres.. and i have seen the manifild and pipes up close i dont think them pics are there stuff Marc even went to his shop and returned with an oil feed line from one of his kits and gave it to me ... i tink it would be best if u guys talk one on one and see whats up they might solve all this crap ..

anyways ... i hope everything works out for everyone.. and by all means no one is perffect not even the big name companies thats have been around for years

laters

Carlos

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

Do we have an owned smiley around here? I think its in order :D

Jimmyg41
Posts: 53
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 8:02 pm

Post

Just so you can see there's two sides to every story. Big props to Marc for coming back to the thread and taking a stand. If that really isn't IAP intercooler piping then shame on Ivan for trying to take down a competitor. Hopefully you guys can get this matter resolved and everything will get cleared up. Marc and IAP still have my full support...I have their manifold (although not on the car yet) and the welds look fine.

Gofast1
Posts: 84
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2003 6:47 pm
Car: 1995 & 1996 240SX
Contact:

Post

Nathan, Jimmy and Carlos:

Thanks for the support! I was hoping some of our customers would respond to this travesty.

I just wanted to add one more thing to this.

We are a new company, we don't have the name Sound Performance does yet, nor the customer base, but we go out of our way to make our customers happy with their purchases.

As I stated, we DID have a WG piping issue. The one Ivan is speaking of. Not only did we repair the issue, test the solution and fire that fabricator, we replaced, at no cost of any kind to the customers, every manifold that had that issue, even if they had no knowledge of the problem. On most of them we even bought the folks new exhaust manifold gaskets as well, because when you remove a manifold, as you all know, the gaskets are destroyed.

We found out our oil feed line was a little on the large side as I posted to another member on this forum. We replaced them all...every single one. We found an issue, fixed the issue and made it right for our customers. If there is a better way to show someone how much we care about our customers, I surely don't know it.

How many companies would stand behind their products to that degree?

Thanks again everyone for all of your continued support!

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

Gofast1 wrote:Ivan, I would love to know about all these 'problems' you are having with our stuff since you and I talked one time about an issue that was resolved months ago. I think it's incredibly poor taste to trash another vendor on an public forum right after you have released a product in direct competition with us.

Let me address this nonsense. I don't know what pictures you have of intercooler piping there, but it isn't ours, ours doesn't look anything like that. Also, as ANYONE who has dealt with us can attest, IF there had been a problem, it would have been fixed. We even pay shipping both ways if there is an issue with one of our products. So I am sorry but I have to call BS on this one bud.:bsflag

The WG problem you are speaking of has been addressed, is gone, has been gone and you know it. By the way all of our manis are now TIG welded and have been for over 7 months, I am not even going to go into that because it has beaten to death on this thread and others.

Also Ivan, the manifold you are speaking of where the coating came off, and you know the one I mean, came off for one reason. By your customer's own lips:

"Marc, the coating is peeling because I spilled some oil onto two fo the runners, will this create a problem with the warranty?"

No, it doesn't. We warranty it anyway. But in manufacturing, as you well know Ivan, you can't run across many coatings that will withstand 1000+ degrees and motor oil. Not unless you own a half million dollar booth.

Marc


I will have both customers who purchased products from you post their opinions on your products.

I answered the question that was asked "who has experience with these manifolds" honestly and truthfully for all members including yourself to read. I am not hiding who I am or trying to stab anybody in the back. This forum is for information and that is what I am providing.

I thought long and hard about posting in response to the question asked. I dont want people to get the impression that I am trash talking. I came to the conclusion that this info SHOULD be out in the open reguardless of how people may view me or my intentions. I believe that I posted in a professional manner EXACTLY what I experienced and noticed about your products. No trash talking just fact. You state that talking about this in a public forum is in bad taste but I dont believe that one bit. This IS the place to talk about these things. Why wouldnt you want somebody to talk about what has been and is going on with your products? Why would it be in good taste to talk about the good without talking about the bad.

The intecooler was represented to me by Phil as being from IAP and with the quality of fabrication I had no reason to doubt him. I have been trying to get in touch with him to double check that is the case. If it is not the case then I will imeadiatly remove all references to that being your kit. If it is your kit, I will have him provide the purchase reciept for the kit so that I can scan that and post it.

As far as the dump tube upgrade, I am glad that you fixed that. In my original post, I stated that problem was addressed. I am sure it was easy once you got the manifold that I had to modify for Matt back at your shop to copy.

I dont know when the manifold that I just installed on Phil's car was made but I can ASSURE you that there were MIG welds on it.

As far as your coating is concerned. When I spoke to you months ago about the problems with your manifolds, you had stated that you had just spent $30,000 on a setup so that you could heat coat "in house" instead of sending out for coating like you had in the past. Phil's (unused) first manifold from IAP was sent back to you and the new design was just sent back to him. Does this manifold have the new coating on it? If it does, then the coating burned off this one in 2 min at Idle. I never dynoed his car and it never did anything here but idle. I also talked to Matt today about his manifold and asked him if it was him that said anything about oil on the coating and he said it wasnt him. So as far as BS, I think that flag your raising is for YOU. I dont know what coating your using but the coating we use here isnt affected by oil and wont ever peel or crack or burn below 1600°.

Matt told me today that he has your new updated manifold and will be back in town in a week and a half (he is at school) at which time he will bring it back to me to install. I will also need to modify the DP that I built for the "old" manifold to get it to fit your new manifold. As you remember, both the manifolds that we had discussions about months ago had the manifold to head flanges welded to the manifold upside down. I will take video of the initial start up and what happens to the heat coating at idle.

I am glad that your back on the forum to discuss these things but I am wondering why you havent mentioned anything about how the flanges got welded on upside down. In another post you stated you fired the fabricator that did your manifolds because of the boost creep issue. Why would you do that? Did this person intentionally put too small tubing in? Did you not check them out before you shipped them? Who designed the manifold? Why would you fire this person and not the person that designed the manifold? What about the person that welded the flanges on upside down? Why would you let somebody so careless fabricate for you?

Who is making the flanges for you? It is a fact that Phil's manifold would not go on the studs on the head. Hopefully Matt's new manifold will go on. If not, expect a video.

I am glad that your at least trying to address the problems with your manifolds and the fabrication of them. I am glad that you opened the dump to WG as I had suggested. I really think that there is a call for a cheap manifold for those that dont mind compromising quality of construction or placement of turbo for cheap HP. I hope that in the long run they work out OK. I personally wouldnt put that kind of stuff on MY car. I respect when something is designed for as little compromise as possible. I wouldnt want to have to wrap my brake master cylinder in heat wrap or have an ugly shield on it because of where the turbo is placed. But thats me. My opinion. And this is what this forum is about.

I do believe that there are others that wont mind paying for somthing that doesnt make those compromises. Hell, there are people out there that are trying to make DSM turbos fit their cars with adapters. I wouldnt do that. Again, thats me. Some day these people might apprciate a properly designed manifold that is fabricated well. Untill they do, there is always people out there willing to make compromises to their product to make a quick buck.

I dont care if I ever sell a manifold. I have enough work to keep me busy for the rest of my life. There are at least 20 cars here for everything from turbo installs to full motor builds. I built the PhatKA-T.com manifold for ME and for people that think like me. If and when I get some manifolds out there, I will be happy to take the good with the bad on the forums. But being an established fabrication shop for the past 15 years and the experienced people with decades of fabricating under their belts, I am sure that the good will outweigh the bad.

User avatar
matt0941
Posts: 404
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2002 6:33 pm
Car: Counter-Strike, Cars, Girls (in that order)

Post

Before I continue I apoligize to those I may offend and am sorry I have to write the following post because I honestly do not wish to hurt anyone. But I debated on what to do about all of this for quite some time and felt that honesty is the best policy here. Additionaly I wish to state that I will probably end up doing future business with IAP AND Sound Performance so of course I am biased but I will do my best to tell the truth so future customers of either of these fine companies can have a fair ground to stand on.

I have dealed extensively with both IAP as well as Sound Performance. Pretty much it comes down to, quite a while ago I purchased the IAP manifold and had sound performance do the rest (intake piping, downpipe, etc. etc.). I got one of their first gen manifolds and to be fair, I did NOT get the kit. I was very proud to hold an equal length manifold in my hands and show it off as at the time equal length KA-T's were a bit unheard of (still kinda rare).

I brought it to a buddy of mine who has EXTENSIVE knowledge of turbocharging cars and just making cars fast as hell in general. He even owned the first f-max kit I believe and is in the works of a 500+ rwhp S14. His brother, a very knowledgeable guy, said the following words that stuck with me, "The manifold looks good from far and far from good." It was true. According to him, it had "Hellen Keller" welds, a restricted WG pipe, bad collecter convergence, and awful temp coating. There was also alot of flash on the small WG pipe, restricting flow even more. I *was* the customer that Ivan talked about. I put the manifold on there anyways and had them go with it. To be fair, Ivan you said that you contacted me about the manifold having a flipped flange, and said that I went to go ahead with it, but you didn't contact me till after. But I would have said go ahead anyways. This is a small mistake but just wanted to point it out to be fair. Not a problem at all.

Anyways, the coating flaked off within minutes. I contacted Marc and we talked. I have to say that this is probably one of the best customer services I have seen, at least the thought of good customer service. Because I was still unsure at the time if it was all talk or they would actually go ahead with it but they seemed to be half and half. I know countless businesses that don't give a **** about the product if they already sold. I talked to Marc back and forth thru phone calls and he said that he would pay for shipping back and forth for the exchange of their better, new-gen manifold. I talked to him extensively and he said the following:

My manifold was coated improperly by a guy they don't hire anymore, my manifold was a very old gen and they had improved extensively. He would extend my warranty for an extra year. He would also coat my IC piping free of charge. And all of this would be sent to me via email.

He never did send me an email but I sent him the manifold and got the new one. I said I would take him up on the IC piping offer but thinking about it, I will probably just do it myself.

I got the new manifold and observed the following:The runners were port-matched to increase flow, much nicer. The collector is still funky in the sense that the collectors meet a tad far apart. The WG pipe is now larger. However, I will have to dremel where the pipe meets the collector myself because there is some flash in there that will restrict flow. I will have to dremel several parts I imagine. Fitment seems pretty identical to the last one. In the sense that it places the turbo (remember, I am not using their kit, I am using my own garret t3/t4) very close to the BMC. The power steering reservoir had to be moved in order for the manifold to fit. The welds still didn't seem all that great, but better. The EGT bung I also had put in there was welded very poorly but I am fairly sure it will hold. I also heard that my friend's manifold (who has the same generation) - its high temp coating flaked off after a while. I have yet to put this one my car (I should in about 3 weeks) and then I can give a more thorough report. Sound Performance will be tuning my car again so I am sure Ivan will get another look at it. As far as Ivan getting "owned" and lying about putting pics up, hardly. Those pics (of the welds) look identical in quality to the ones on my manifold.

I got a chance to stop by sound performance recently to check out their manifold and it looks very nice. The convergence of the runners is nice, placement is awesome, and so on. I can post pics about all that I am talking about if you guys want (when I get back in 3 weeks). I feel awful having to say this as Marc is a super cool guy and tries really hard to fix these problems, but if I could go back and do it again I would not have gone through IAP. However, I do feel that sound performance is unjust in ragging on this manifold. Whenever me or my friend with the other manifold go over there it seems like they are ragging on it like it is a POS. This is still better than 90% of the manifolds on the market, it is not ****. It just could use some improvement from where I am standing.

But remember, this is MY OWN PERSONAL EXPERIENCE! You could order one now, get it and have it turn out perfect, who knows.

Sorry if I offended you Ivan or Marc. And best of luck with the manifolds. You are both there to help us enthusiasts out, and would like to acknowledge you for doing so.

Peace,Matthew Rac[email protected]

Projex240
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 9:52 pm
Car: Dogs , My RIDE

Post

Someone grab a mop and a bucket---the peepee contest is starting to get a little out of hand.

ummm-k,

If there are any problems with any kit that is sent out from any vendor, they are usually replaced or whatever it may take to honor good customer satisfaction. But as far as I can tell, I havent heard too many problems with the IAP kits at all. All I can say is that if they peel off, then 2 out of the many manifolds that have gone out peeling must be the exception, not the rule. There is more ot the story for the 2 guys that have had problems consecutively where as the other people havent had one problem at all. I do agree that if there is some general knowledge that all should be aware of, then it does belong on public forums, but to post pictures and to be slanderous in any when adressing another bussiness is both unethical in business practice, and in poor taste. Let the individuals who are having the problems post their experiences with the product, not another venodr of a competing product.

If I were to have a problem with a phat ka-t manifold, it would be out of line for someone from lets say greddy to post pics on here in an attempt to show design flaws on your design wouldnt it? It would just show their eagerness to try to talk down a competing product. Its bad business, dude. Let people decide for themselvs what the IAP manifolds are good for. You cant tell me it was your intention to educate other about the IAP manifold quality. If that were the case, you could have simply encouraged them to post about it themsleves here on the forums. You made a point of it just to show that you may have a better quality product. If you do--GREAT. Id like to look into one myself. I am alwasy looking for the best parts available seeing as how just about everything for the KA is custom and or fabricated by specialty shops.

Marc---if Ivan is right---why wold the coating be peeling other than oil on it? I defintaley would not be arguementative as far as this is concerned, but I have split oil on my mani before--and it didnt peel off at all. Granted i cleaned it well before cranking the car. But this guys says that the coating peeled off just from sitting idle after being replaced/recoated. Whats the deal, dude?Marc and I have talked many times about our cars, and he is a great guy with an outstanding business sense and personality. He is very excited about the products he offers and stands by them 150%. I dont see him being the shady person that he was made out to be in the last many posts.

I hope we can eb alittle more gorwn up about all of hits. To the people that have problems with the mani--stop allowing a business with a competative product do the talking for you. Speak up and say your peice.

To the guy who tried to blame IAP for his motor blowing up---get real. It happens. AND 99.9 % of the time--its user/installler error.

Marc---when you gonna sell me those wheels dude?lol--j/k

-Josh

Projex240
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 9:52 pm
Car: Dogs , My RIDE

Post

He posted the same time as me----great response. Very mature approach to stating your opinion.

_josh

TrunkMonkey
Posts: 3190
Joined: Sun Aug 04, 2002 7:48 am
Car: 2000 Lincoln Navigator

Post

back by popular demand....

first and foremost, NOTHING has been changed in this thread. it's still raw and uncensored. if you typed like an idiot who was high on paint thinner before it disppeared, well...you still look like an idiot high on paint thinner.

let's keep this as civil as possible.

-demetrius

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

I agree. If there was/is any problem or something you don't like about anything Marc will take care of it, as he has stated. You can't just go bashing someone without trying to resolve it first. But with the heat coatings issue. Unless you go to Jet-Hot, there is a decent chance that whatever coating is put on the manifold will come off. I'm not so sure that powder coating will hold up to the temps that are being applied to these manifolds either, but I've been wrong once before :)

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

Gofast1 wrote:Ivan,

Let me address this nonsense. I don't know what pictures you have of intercooler piping there, but it isn't ours, ours doesn't look anything like that. Also, as ANYONE who has dealt with us can attest, IF there had been a problem, it would have been fixed. We even pay shipping both ways if there is an issue with one of our products. So I am sorry but I have to call BS on this one bud.:bsflag

Marc


Marc, I appreciate your dedication to your products and to your customers. I am sure they appreciate (as Matt stated in his post) the way you stand behind your products and take care of problems in the end. Its good business to do that.

I have to take offense to you calling me a liar and saying that I am falsifying information to slander you and improve my position or reputation. This is not the case. I am only trying to inform people who WANT to know (remember the question was asked) MY experiences with your product.

So, to refresh your memory here are some pictures.



This is a picture from YOU that YOU sent to Phil telling him that these were HIS intercooler pipes that you were sending him.



This is a picture of the SAME pipe that is in the pictures I posted earlier. For this picture I placed the pipe in the same position as YOUR picture so that you can see that in fact, this is the EXACT SAME PIPE. The BOV flange is cut off because this was the only usable piece that I could use to fabricate a new pipe to replace this one.



This is a picture of the PayPal reciept from Phil when he purchased the IC piping from YOU.

I hope this jogs your memory. I will be happy to provide the full size pictures if your interested.

I do believe you owe me an apology.

I hope that this will put to rest anybodys assumptions as to what my intentions were when I first posted. I dont think that ANYBODY would be able to recomend any product produced by the same people that made these intecooler pipes.

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

Projex240 wrote:But as far as I can tell, I havent heard too many problems with the IAP kits at all. All I can say is that if they peel off, then 2 out of the many manifolds that have gone out peeling must be the exception, not the rule.

I do agree that if there is some general knowledge that all should be aware of, then it does belong on public forums, but to post pictures and to be slanderous in any when adressing another bussiness is both unethical in business practice, and in poor taste. Let the individuals who are having the problems post their experiences with the product, not another venodr of a competing product.

-Josh


Josh, I do appreciate your response and believe that your a reasonable person with reasonable opinions. Let me just say a couple things.

The question was asked "So, has anyone installed the kit yet or even the manifold? If so, how is it working out?" and of all the people here I would tend to say that I have more experience with the IAP products than anybody other then Marc. I have had experience with THREE of the IAP manifolds and one of their IC pipe kits. Every piece that I have seen from IAP has had more then just minor problems. I dont know about you but when I get FOUR products from one place that are all of questionable design and fabrication that throws up a red flag for me. I feel obligated to inform others of what they might be getting themselves into. Wouldnt you feel like you should inform people of a place selling IC piping with 1/3 of the piping blocked by the BOV flange and welds that looked like goose poop? I am sure that you would do the same.

I think that Greddy emanage sux for NA to boosted applications. If I tell people that come to the shop that I feel this way, is this ME trying to take business away from Greddy? NOPE. I loved the Profec B and sold the hell out of them. I hate the Profec B Spec II so I now recomend the HKS EVC EZ II. The Greddy three row for the Supra ROCKS and the Apexi IC fits like crap. The HKS SuperAFR is a PITA to program but the Apexi SAFC is AWESOME and the SAFC II is even better. All day, every day, I guide people into what WORKS and what DOESNT. In MY experience, the stuff from IAP that I have seen isnt worth the problems you get for the dollars invested. PERIOD. Maybe quality is improving. I dont know. What I do know is what I have seen so far and that is exactly what I talked about in the original post

If I had come here to tell everyone how everyone elses turbo kit for the KA sux, why have I not said a thing about ETD? Honestly, the pictures I have seen of the manifold look awesome. Super quality construction. Smoking price. I havent seen one in person or installed one or seen the fitment so I cant say anything else about that manifold.

I hope this will help you understand my intentions.

Thanx for listening

User avatar
fiznat
Posts: 5651
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2002 10:15 am
Car: Grown up :(
Contact:

Post

IvanAtSPRacing wrote:I have seen from IAP has had more then just minor problems. I dont know about you but when I get FOUR products from one place that are all of questionable design and fabrication that throws up a red flag for me. I feel obligated to inform others of what they might be getting themselves into.


Of course, but also you really just CANT be unaware of what it looks like to see a vendor bashing another vendor's product. Even if the complaints are valid (and I certainly admit that they might me - those are some compelling pictures if they really are from marc), you have to understand what it looks like to the average NICO guy (and especially the mods...). The fact is, you are a vendor and - reasonable intentions or not - it's gonna be hard to prove that you are really in this argument for the greater good.

You shoulda got someone else to file the complaint for ya- if for nothing else than to save the loss of credibility that you suffer as a vendor... It's tough to be trusted here on the net as it is, and you're really only hurting yourself.

...just some practical advise

IvanAtSPRacing
Posts: 479
Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 3:56 pm
Car: I make cars fast
Contact:

Post

I agree with you. I can and did see how it might look. I know that its hard to believe just about ANYTHING you see on the net these days. If you check my original post, at the bottom, you will see that I pointed out the fact that I knew how things might look and tried to explain myself. I appreciate the Mods bringing this post back after seeing all the pictures and hearing from my customers. I want people to know that I am was not trying to help myself but save others from problems they might encounter.

If you get to know me you will find out that I am a really helpfully person that will go out of my way to do just about anything for people. I love my job and this sport / hobby. I want everybody to have a good experience and enjoy things without making some of the same mistakes I have made in the past 20+ years.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54538
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

As Demitrius said, this thread has been returned in its entirety. I took it down for a while so we (the Exec Team) could discuss it in detail.

I trust that things will remain civil from now on. Especially since there are two NON-advertisers coming dangerously close to violating our "no commercial posts" policy... I'll be discussing this matter with Marc and Ivan momentarily. :)

Lastly, I hope that whoever posted the smart-arse comments over on that "other" Nissan forum (*cough* WEAK *cough*) about NICO moderators "censoring" members will go back in there and retract their ill-advised comments.

Besides, only seven people were on THAT forum to read it.... LOL :D

User avatar
red240ne
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Aug 23, 2002 9:02 pm
Car: mmm...donuts
Contact:

Post

Gofast1 wrote:
Curt,

Sorry about your motor bud, but blame someone else since all you have ever purchased from us is an S13 downpipe, NOT a manifold, so please be sure someone you are bashing for no reason doesn't keep detailed records of transactions.


I bought it from a guy on Zilvia who had bought it from you. I don't know anyone who hasn't had a problem with the wastegate runner.

curt

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Again I havent installed my manifold, but my Tial wg bolts right up and is evenly matched. Maybe there was some problems in the past, but obviously they have been addressed and the products couldn't be better now.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”