im done with tein coilovers, time for new ones???

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
User avatar
OM3GA
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2006 11:41 pm
Car: A Sexy Mobile, 1993 Nissan 240sx 180sx Hatcher

Post

Pick the ones that look the coolest.


User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

OM3GA wrote:Pick the ones that look the coolest.
haha well i think the DMAX look the coolest looking with PBM second KTS third and Stance GR + last

sr_240sx
Posts: 272
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 9:36 am
Car: 1989 240sx w/SR20DET and 2003 Altima SE 3.5L

Post

How many inches they drop? your teins!!!I have Tokico shocks with Eibach sport line springs and they go 2.1 and 2.2" lower than stock.

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

Tenzo

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

sr_240sx wrote:How many inches they drop? your teins!!!I have Tokico shocks with Eibach sport line springs and they go 2.1 and 2.2" lower than stock.
haha well...

stock ride height you can put your fist in between the front fender and the tyre no problem

on the stock 15's i was tucking half the tire (195-60-15) without drooping and currently ive got about 10-15mm of clearance on my 16x8 with a 205 stretch and 2.5 degrees neg camber

sooooooo alot? idono haha

idono why but i maxed out my camber plates in the front and its only 2.5 degrees. that seems pretty weak consittering they are somewhat decent coilovers, i rub VERY SLIGHTLY on full stiff on hard turns and im gonna try to pull my fenders out a little more since i cant run anymore camber

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

duffman1278 wrote:Tenzo
didnt even know they made coilovers

could they really be better than PBM, Stance, DMAX or KTS?

User avatar
95.240AZN378
Posts: 801
Joined: Sun May 07, 2006 2:39 pm
Car: VW

Post

pretty new company, heard a lot of good from the company, and they're nice people.http://www.fortune-auto.net/productpage.htm

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

95.240AZN378 wrote:pretty new company, heard a lot of good from the company, and they're nice people.http://www.fortune-auto.net/productpage.htm
those are interesting, never heard of them, they look pretty sweet

kinda like the DMAX coilovers (the rear bottom purch is so long!) custom spring rates are nice...still though

rougly in the same price range too with the 1300 bucks, id still probably go wtih PBM cause they seem like the most legitimate company out there overall, plus i like their policy if i break their coilover

User avatar
240lookis
Posts: 1760
Joined: Thu Jun 05, 2008 10:08 am
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

fortune auto coilovers are legit. they dont lose suspension travel with lower ride heights so they are great for daily driving if you want your s*** slammed.

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

i
240lookis wrote:fortune auto coilovers are legit. they dont lose suspension travel with lower ride heights so they are great for daily driving if you want your s*** slammed.
thats pretty sweet, yeah im looking for limited suspension travel

the pbm wouldnt be comperable in that regars?

and your going to have to forgive me if im wrong but i could have swore that suspension travel was govorned by preload and dapening not ride height
Modified by poshatch at 6:54 PM 1/27/2010

jayrawr
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 4:15 pm
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx Fastback

Post

i have stance gr+pro, i love them ! not too stiff, and not too soft. and they go pretty damn low, my front crossmember is about 1 inch off the ground maxed out. i daily and track them and they've held up fine. as for spring rate i believe mine are 6k 8k not too sure thouhg

User avatar
Gabes13
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:59 am
Car: rb20det s13
Location: St. Pete, Fl.

Post

240lookis wrote:they dont lose suspension travel with lower ride heights
What's that supposed to mean?All the other coilovers mentioned are bottom mount adjustable too.So travel is only affected be the adjustment knob...

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post



see this is what im dealing with right now

dosnt look low enough to me...

and the camber plates on these tein he's are maxed out at 2.5 degrees

so i need something thats a bit more adjustable, lower and more adjustable, and stiffer

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

ok sooo...ive been looking into the coilovers that i had narrowed it down too

PBM, DMAX, Stance, and KTS ultra lows

i ruled out stance because for 1500 bucks i want something PERFECT and the springs look like their length is longer than the other coilovers as well as the 8kg/6kg spring rate being too soft

im leaning away from the DMAX because of the inverted mono tube (bottom dampening adjust) but not ruled out completely

now...

my next question for those who own the remaining ones is....how much front camber are you able to get out of the top mount camber plate?

one of my current problems is my tein HE winding masters dont allow for enough camber in the front, only 2.0-2.5 degrees (and im rubbing slightly on the fenders on hard turns on full stiff)

and i want to be able to run slightly more camber and also even out the front and the rear heights

my friend has kts and he can run close to 3.0 i believe and the pbm look like they can as well

just would like to know, thanks everybody for all the input your giving me

User avatar
nismotuner1
Posts: 200
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 5:19 pm
Car: s13 Hatch
05'Titan
Location: Binghamton, NY

Post

I'm running -3 degrees in the front on my superdrifts and could go more on the camber plate. Are your control arms bent or something?

User avatar
blacktop sr20kid
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Car: 1990 240sx

Post

ViolentRunning13 wrote:Dmax are very daily driver friendly. Super comfy.
i 2nd Dmax!awesome people! great coilovers! i dailyed with them for 2 years in Montana winters and Arizona summers.

go really low also

User avatar
blacktop sr20kid
Posts: 203
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Car: 1990 240sx

Post

poshatch wrote:
im leaning away from the DMAX because of the inverted mono tube (bottom dampening adjust) but not ruled out completely
and im pretty sure the inverted mono tube system has better dampening properties. they stay cooler when your suspension is under heavy load on the track.

although the adjustment knob isnt in the most practical place. they supposedly last longer

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

blacktop sr20kid wrote:
and im pretty sure the inverted mono tube system has better dampening properties. they stay cooler when your suspension is under heavy load on the track.

although the adjustment knob isnt in the most practical place. they supposedly last longer
yea i read that too

the adjustment is just more of a pain than top mounted ones but its not a huge factor in my decision

the pbm come in 10kg/8kg with 6kg free if you ask for it so i could run the stiffer set up or the softer set up if i want, while the dmax come in 8kg/6kg only

my main concern for these coilovers (since both are extremely good) would be the top camber plates and which one gives more adjustability over the other, just upon looking at the camber plates of both they both seem comperable

User avatar
Gabes13
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 11:59 am
Car: rb20det s13
Location: St. Pete, Fl.

Post

Here's where you run into problems.I have PSM coils.As low as they go.Camber plates maxed.Stock s13 LCA.And have about -2.5 degrees of camber.

Problem 1.It doesn't matter how long the slots are on the camber plates.You're going to be limited to camber b/c of the tiny hole provided on the chassis.You know, on top of the strut tower.

Problem 2.You'll naturally gain negative camber when you lower the car.But, once the LCA becomes less horizontal and more verticalYou'll start to gain positive camberTotally negating the negative camber you get from lowering the car. Essentially, the lower you go, the more positive camber.

DMAX on the other hand,Has slotted bottom Brackets for a little more negative camber at the wheel. PSM does not have this feature.

If you really want gobbs of negative camber,you're going to have to get s14 LCAor Adjustable onesand/or modify the top of the strut towers to enable more negative camber.

User avatar
poshatch
Posts: 853
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 7:44 am
Car: p.o.s. 1990 240sx hatch

Post

i am begining to think that they are bent because both are maxed out, and one side has 2.0 degrees and the other 2.5 degrees of negative camber

i needed more camber due to clearance in the front but i pulled my front fenders and now it isnt a problem, i would just like to eventually replace them and roll them and not have to pull them and run a little more negative camber but maybe not

and the he's are no where near butting up to the chasis at the strut tower

there is alot more room for it to be able to go but it cant because of the design of the plates

and i get what your saying about the LCA and positive camber...im gonna have to work out all these problems, still waiting on the federal return before buying the PBM or the DMAX so i still got time to think about everything
pandapants wrote:Here's where you run into problems.I have PSM coils.As low as they go.Camber plates maxed.Stock s13 LCA.And have about -2.5 degrees of camber.

Problem 1.It doesn't matter how long the slots are on the camber plates.You're going to be limited to camber b/c of the tiny hole provided on the chassis.You know, on top of the strut tower.

Problem 2.You'll naturally gain negative camber when you lower the car.But, once the LCA becomes less horizontal and more verticalYou'll start to gain positive camberTotally negating the negative camber you get from lowering the car. Essentially, the lower you go, the more positive camber.

DMAX on the other hand,Has slotted bottom Brackets for a little more negative camber at the wheel. PSM does not have this feature.

If you really want gobbs of negative camber,you're going to have to get s14 LCAor Adjustable onesand/or modify the top of the strut towers to enable more negative camber.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”