i agree it took 15 posts for some one to tell the biatch to search its been covered hundreds of times just look and dont post till you know sometinng about what your doingturbo98_240sx wrote:1st, How is this not locked already?
2nd, Your only as fast as your wallet
3rd, No one motor (let alone certain type of motor) is gonna rule in every department, different motors do different things, hell look at a KA power band vs. one with V3 cams, the whole power band shifts and the motor becomes a different "beast" if you will. That's the trick and fun of building your car up different mods make power in different places it's all up to driver preference
4th, pick 2 of these 3, Power, Cost Effective or Reliability (and only 2)
5th, A motor is only as strong as it's weakest link, whatever it is........tuning, rods, pistons, fuel system, air flow, exc...... one of those is probably where your tq/hp limit comes from I mean there is more but in a nutshell those are the biggies.
6th, Both engines have ample aftermarket support, SR20DE's were sold in cars in the states, and aftermarket for the SR20DET is endless..........and the KA24DE/E has a nice selection of parts OEM and otherwise, plenty of turbo kits/upgrades too along with the custom route on both.
7th, The SR has been being "tuned" longer then the KA has been around being built up/tuned so the SR has more tested and tried things done to it, The KA on the other hand is relatively newer so things are being worked out and are experimental, but it is catching up fast to knowns and provens vs the SR
Answering your question, I went KA-T because the KA was in the car, I like the power band/ TQ #'s. SR wiring *seems* like a pain TO ME, I'ma DYI guy so the Idea of turboing something that wasn't in the first place sounded fun, and I had a sentra with the SR20DE in it (loved every second of that car too) and even though it was never boosted(SR) the KA-T seemed like a better match for MY driving style and preference.......It all depends on what YOU want, Low end TQ or High Revs and top end power, Even though both motors *could* (in theroy) be set up to do either but with in there respective limits and needs for upgrades to do so, see #2.
Almost forgot cost wise $ per HP I feel it's gonna be a toss up between SR and KA and once your into the 350ish+ HP land it's uber time/money/effort spent and your into internals on both, Reliability is gonna depend on a ton of factors, a few of witch are the SR's quality up front (condition of swap) same for KA (how good the motor is b4 you boost it). You have to use parts that arn't cheep if you want any kind of reliability. What you upgrade and where you upgrade (head work vs bottom end)....It all depends on your goals and budget knowing those and what the car will be used for are probably the bigger factors. Just my .02
Modified by turbo98_240sx at 10:09 AM 8/15/2005
Modified by turbo98_240sx at 10:15 AM 8/15/2005
I wish It was a basic question, I know the debate will sway both was at diffrent times but there is alot to back up both motors, thats why it's your preffrence of the two that answers the question.Riley2.4L wrote:Well damn. Sorry for opening pandora's box with my basic questioning.
Cost really in my eyes being the lesser of the two, if you do it right the first trime, you'll save alot in the end, hell look at all the tuners that know what they were doing and still had a motor blow, point is you can never know to much so.........Riley2.4L wrote: But I read all your guys posts and quite frankly what I've learned that really the determining factors to go either SR-T or KA-T are preference and cost.
Get usta reading, hehe the more you know the better your gonna be able to do, also put aside plenty of time for things to go wrong, it happens but don't exspect your daily driver to under go a build in a weekend, plan accordingly to project sizeRiley2.4L wrote:After reading ( for what seemed like an eternity)
ok now your this far, I guess what are your horsepower/torque goals? What year 240sx, budget? what is the main purpose for upgrades, track car, drag, drift, just a daily driver w/ more power (like still maintains alot of driveability and also MPG but this also depends on how you drive it, same with dependiblity, as does how well you build it) Now there are ways to save money on your build allmost anyways you go, but cut to many corners and boom............. food for thought, regardless let me know and I'll try to help you out as much as I canPeacePatRiley2.4L wrote: I'm leaning more towards the KA-T. No disrespect to those running the SR's but to me this whole KA SR battle is like an inverted import versus domestic battle. on one end you got the SR which though has a smaller displacement, comes stock turbo and brings higher horsepower stock. Not to mention its been around longer to be experimented on and for more innnovations to be created ( just like any of those old domestic motors) The KA is younger, already showing potential with its larger displacement, and comes stock in American 240's. The thing is the reason I got into imports is because I've always had an undying respect for those who can take a small displacement commuter car and turn it into high horsepower monster. In this case the "commuter car" is the KA24DE. Turboed it would produce more power and torque for less money spent ( I read one of you got a SR for like $350. I don't know what mafia connections you have but I've shopped around and no normal person can that engine that cheap.) Thanks to all you guys for the input and sorry for creating that hell storm there. By the way any suggestions as to what brands I should look into for turbos?
I could put together an SR20DE-T for about the same price if not less than a KA-T and it would produce the same numbers. I bet not one person in this forum could put it together without me telling them the hot setup, but that doesn't mean I won't tell those who want to know.Riley2.4L wrote:cost.
When you say this your using a SR20DE from the states and then building it up with a turbo "kit" right? I too think that would be the route that I would go if I went SR.......not to say it is the best route but if your ripping up internals on one with a turbo allready why not just have it be cheep stuff that your going to throw away or have sit on a shelf. Same basic engine and if your building the hell out of it might as well save your self some $$ and not get a JDM motor, thinking about it you could save hella $$ doing it this way.Nismo_Freak wrote:
I could put together an SR20DE-T for about the same price if not less than a KA-T and it would produce the same numbers. I bet not one person in this forum could put it together without me telling them the hot setup, but that doesn't mean I won't tell those who want to know.
Don't be quick to rule out something because of it's surface cost... this goes for both options.
Ex. Nitrous is at first cheap but just as expensive in the long run.
Ultimately the cheapest option is what you WANT.
No, USDM engines are FWD.turbo98_240sx wrote:When you say this your using a SR20DE from the states and then building it up with a turbo "kit" right? I too think that would be the route that I would go if I went SR.......not to say it is the best route but if your ripping up internals on one with a turbo allready why not just have it be cheep stuff that your going to throw away or have sit on a shelf. Same basic engine and if your building the hell out of it might as well save your self some $$ and not get a JDM motor, thinking about it you could save hella $$ doing it this way.
In the end your still only as fast as your budget allows but that don't mean that you can't be thrifty about where the money is spent. Plus do it right the first time and you'll save the $$ to do it over again, not to mention the pain and frustration or downtime.