Thank you! thank you! thank you! All too often people complain about poor performance and write the KA off as crap when in reality it just hasn't been maintained or even had a tune up in God knows when.AZhitman wrote:Also, get your KA back in "as new" running order by doing ALL the maintenance - You'd be surprised how fun a perfectly-running stock KA can be.
Depending on which motor he has, your's has just as much as his. but your's reaches peak torque sooner.costa_rican13 wrote:thanks i will definitly look in to that. also i have a friend that is honda ricer. and he's got a 95 prelude w/ full exhaust, with an engine with alot of torque. so thats why i want alot of torque cause he's always saying my ka's weak although it is complete stock too, w/ just suspension and aftermarket spark plug wires . so i want to show him whats up. anymor ideas.
-Try getting altima fans and getting rid of that clutch fan. I think that gives 6whp and 4 wtq IIRC. Thats 30 dollars-Use full synthetic Oil. Thats 30 dollars-relocate your battery to the back and bend a pipe to where the battery is, that gives you low end torque also. Thats rougly 50 dollars- get a 2.5" exhaust system. That depends on what you get lolcosta_rican13 wrote:thanks i will definitly look in to that. also i have a friend that is honda ricer. and he's got a 95 prelude w/ full exhaust, with an engine with alot of torque. so thats why i want alot of torque cause he's always saying my ka's weak although it is complete stock too, w/ just suspension and aftermarket spark plug wires . so i want to show him whats up. anymor ideas.
So, are you saying the fan takes about 7.5hp at the crank? While putting in e fans might tidy things up, they certainly do not free up any power. The fans freewheel when not needed and its a lightweight plastic fan. The ONLY reason for e fans is for space concerns, or when going with an aftermarket radiator to which the stock equipment isn't the best fit.-RJ- wrote:-Try getting altima fans and getting rid of that clutch fan. I think that gives 6whp and 4 wtq IIRC. Thats 30 dollars
I disagree. I noticed a bigger improvement with a lightweight flywheel than with the aluminium driveshaft.A heavier flywheel makes it easier to drive from a stop due to the added inertia, but when you get the car moving, less weight will help the engine spin faster and help the car accelerate more quickly. So there is an element of preference when deciding on a flywheel- do you want a car that is easier to drive, or able to accelerate more quickly? There's also the dynamics of where the weight is on the flywheel, etc. but that gets way more confusing. I've had my Fidanza for 7 years now and I love it.I'm actually plotting to go back to the 2-piece driveshaft because I can't stand the extra noise from the one-piece. The slightly-less weight doesn't give enough performance to justify the noise to me.Hype wrote:
You definitely got it right with the flywheel thing tho, thats another trendy mod that generally has no benefit to a stock car. I'm considering a slightly lightened one but none of these ridiculous 8 lb flywheels plz. Save your money and get an aluminum or cf driveshaft if you wanna improve drivetrain efficiency!
damn spin..your allways hittin the nail dead on..what it has a target on it!..lol..ya spins got it man...the ka us verry under rated as far as a powerplant goes...it has gobs of torque low to mid ..but yours may be due for some temder lovin rebuild care..if thats the case...then you can make it super strong man..remeber..the ka24de was intended as a truck motor..for pulling..there is hidden power to be had..but not at high rpm...the stroke is to long unless you do big buck additions..good luck and let us know what ya decide.spindrift187 wrote:
Thank you! thank you! thank you! All too often people complain about poor performance and write the KA off as crap when in reality it just hasn't been maintained or even had a tune up in God knows when.
I always remove all the non essentials(emissions, A/C, P/S), switch to a e-fan, make your own intake, extra unecessary weight( Do NOT confuse this with gutting your car haha).
Doesnt the KA already have more torque/weigh less than preludes anyway?
Thanks for the feedback. I hear pros and cons about flywheels, but I think its safe to say that most people aren't really aware of what a lightened flywheel will do to the drivability of the car. AFAIK Fidanza's are well made and aren't too light. I was even maybe planning to get something a little closer to stock. It's hard to get objective feedback because when people spend $$$ on car parts they are all amped up. Thanks for the good input... something for me to consider.Ajax wrote:
I disagree. I noticed a bigger improvement with a lightweight flywheel than with the aluminium driveshaft.A heavier flywheel makes it easier to drive from a stop due to the added inertia, but when you get the car moving, less weight will help the engine spin faster and help the car accelerate more quickly. So there is an element of preference when deciding on a flywheel- do you want a car that is easier to drive, or able to accelerate more quickly? There's also the dynamics of where the weight is on the flywheel, etc. but that gets way more confusing. I've had my Fidanza for 7 years now and I love it.I'm actually plotting to go back to the 2-piece driveshaft because I can't stand the extra noise from the one-piece. The slightly-less weight doesn't give enough performance to justify the noise to me.
When you're too broke to afford "real" mods you learn some pretty handy stuff over the years.liquid_cool wrote:damn spin..your allways hittin the nail dead on..what it has a target on it!..lol
so what do you mean bend a pipe? what pipe?-RJ- wrote:-relocate your battery to the back and bend a pipe to where the battery is, that gives you low end torque also. Thats rougly 50 dollars
relocating the battery lets u use a short ram intake...or do a fmic...front mounted intercooler...there are lots of tricks that people can hand you sire....but you wont really learn that way..you need to do exhausted searches..look throu all idea's and info..then choose the best path and modifye that idea to suit you...good luckcosta_rican13 wrote: so what do you mean bend a pipe? what pipe?
Im quoting that from a magazine, Import Tuner i think. To me it makes sense, the crank doesnt have to spin that fan anymore so it doesnt spin as hard, so i would expect at least some kind of gain. Try riding a bike with a parachute, then try riding the bike again without it, it takes less power for you to move the bike right?Hype wrote:
So, are you saying the fan takes about 7.5hp at the crank?
goto autozone and get a 45 degree pipe, a battery ground cable and a 100 amp fuse, a battery box from Walmart, and 15' of 4 gauge cable and some screws from Lowes.costa_rican13 wrote: so what do you mean bend a pipe? what pipe?
As much as I like to read Import Tuner, SCC or Super Street once in awhile, recognize that they are out to make a buck. They plug parts like no other. Don't believe quoted numbers without dyno graphs showing WHERE and HOW MUCH power was made (even then be skeptical.)-RJ- wrote:
Im quoting that from a magazine, Import Tuner i think. To me it makes sense, the crank doesnt have to spin that fan anymore so it doesnt spin as hard, so i would expect at least some kind of gain. Try riding a bike with a parachute, then try riding the bike again without it, it takes less power for you to move the bike right?
ok what is the pipe for? sorry its probably a dumb question. but i honestly don't know. and how would relocating the battery help me gain more torque?-RJ- wrote:goto autozone and get a 45 degree pipe
zer...41786costa_rican13 wrote: ok what is the pipe for? sorry its probably a dumb question. but i honestly don't know. and how would relocating the battery help me gain more torque?
should look something like this. You can have it go lower but i choose to put it like that becuase i dont want to suck in water,costa_rican13 wrote: ok what is the pipe for? sorry its probably a dumb question. but i honestly don't know. and how would relocating the battery help me gain more torque?
so if i remove the clutch is there anything negative that will happen? like my car will still be able to run and drive right?krazydriver wrote:removing the clutch fan WILL make a difference.The clutch is thermostatic, it doesn't freewheel while your driving. It's constantly spinning with the engine, it only FULLY locks when the fan clutch gets past a certain temp(what that temp is idk).You will feel a difference in how fast the engine revs.