Hey you're smarter than you look..Porting the runners but having them taper down near the head flange IMO. This will increase mixture velocity and help to increase the homogeneity of the mixture. But thats a lot of grinding and just adds to the costs, which I'm sure wont help sales much, especially since it wont contribute much to peak HP numbers..WDRacing wrote:I'm looking forward to seeing the numbers. I'd port the runners alot more personally. I'd also move the weld to the outside of the runner. But I'm pretty far from doing up my own mani at this time. So as the current, and only, this one loooks pretty damn good to me.
WD
Typically forced inducted manifolds don't run these, as they can induce alot of turbulence in the manifold with the tops of the bells being in the manifold. They help in smoothing out airflow and slightly increasing velocity into the port, but with forced induction the turbocharger is providing the velocity.IWannaS15 wrote:Most intake manifolds Ive seen have the runners enter the plenum and end with a bell shaped mouth (aka velocity stacks?). Any advantage to that setup over Xcessive's design?
look at the tiled logo in the background.WDRacing wrote:Thats a pretty damn clean head Alan. When I ported mine I spent hours polishing the bowl and runners to get rid of the casting defects and it still didn't look that nice. Did you do that one yourself??
WD
Man and I'm supposed to be the one looking at all the details. We get so much forced situation awareness training, I think it may actually be working backwards.
Sounds like you need more beer my friend.WDRacing wrote:Man and I'm supposed to be the one looking at all the details. We get so much forced situation awareness training, I think it may actually be working backwards.