O.K so your willing to spend $3500 in bottom end parts and a crank with a 91mm stroke, not including a build from a shop for warrantee???AMS fullycounterweighted crank with 96mm (stock) stroke capable of using stock internals (rods and pistons) $1500....You do the math.........240sxRAOR wrote:Actually I just found out that Brian crower is about to come out with a stroker kit and I could have a KA2.65de. That would be wicked and as the saying goes there is no replacement for displacement. Besides Torque > Horsepower.
Well I didn't know it cost that much, I just found it and looked at it for a few minutes. I thought it was a stroker kit but it looks more like a bore kit which I don't want. Thanks for pointing it out.Bigvinnie wrote:
O.K so your willing to spend $3500 in bottom end parts and a crank with a 91mm stroke, not including a build from a shop for warrantee???AMS fullycounterweighted crank with 96mm (stock) stroke capable of using stock internals (rods and pistons) $1500....You do the math.........
I would run ITB's but I have something better in mind and its a very unproven idea which I will release when I get the results.redtop91 wrote:There isn't a stroker on the planet that is under 3 grand. You should be glad about that price. My SR22 is going to cost almost five grand. Anyways most people that do NA KA's run ITB's from the GSX-R or get some custom fabbed. My Honda friends swear by TWM induction. http://www.twminduction.com/Th....html Set aside another 2 grand for the ITB's, if not more. Irregardless you'd better add a standalone to that list because you're not running ITB's without it.
Talk to Chris at AMS he is the vendor at my forum at club 240. Due to the fact I respect Greg, I can't give out my entire forum address ( i cannot advertise my forum for sake of arguement). Chris is the sales rep at AMS is infact as he stated "making them" they are not advertised. But they are there and available. Please talk to Chris, my forums vendor.240sxRAOR wrote:Hey man I looked for the AMS fully counterweighted crank and couldn't find the one your talking about. I also did a bunch more research and I see what your saying. This is the reason I made this post because I knew there were some things I'd over look.
hes the vendor here tooBigvinnie wrote:Talk to Chris at AMS he is the vendor at my forum at club 240. Due to the fact I respect Greg, I can't give out my entire forum address ( i cannot advertise my forum for sake of arguement). Chris is the sales rep at AMS is infact as he stated "making them" they are not advertised. But they are there and available. Please talk to Chris, my forums vendor.
Thanks for the advise. I have done alot of research but anyone can overlook something important, thats why I started this post. My reasons for going NA with this 240sx is because I don't need alot of horsepower for autocross. I am much more intrested in torque and am not trying to make a motor that revs past 9k which is why I don't mind keeping the stroke. I have seen ITBS and I like the concept but I like I said earlier I have a idea I do not wish to disclose to everyone and it definetly won't work with ITBS. One last reason I would like to make this 240sx NA is because I am intrested in circuit, autocross and drifting and as much as I like turbo and superchargers, I'd rather be an underdog with this 240sx. The KA24de is an underdog engine and alot of people think its crap, it makes me want to beat them with it and I think having less power in a circuit race can be more challenging.d!ck wrote:before you look into making your own manifold, check out DJpantsspecR's thread regarding his product. why are you hesitant to do an itb setup? are you wanting to retain the MAFS for simplicity's sake?
I guess Ivan and Chris are running big time business. Ivan as far as I know never leaves a post. Chris leaves a few posts once a week. The fact that they are vendors at more than one forum means that they are deep into the after market performance business. Last I checked there website lists that they have shop locations through out the U.K, Europe, and the U.S. I think AMS has blown up BIG TIME.nismofly wrote:
hes the vendor here too
him and ivan both post all the time
What is missed here is that there are strokers that deliver up to a good 8500RPM redline for 4 banger engines. What people fail to comprehend is the difference between a fully counterweighted crank, and a half or what people call a partial crank. The harmonics and differences in similarities between the 2 are obvious, but to most builders that just look at the stroke can't compare the differences.240sxRAOR wrote: I am much more intrested in torque and am not trying to make a motor that revs past 9k which is why I don't mind keeping the stroke.