And there are so many dumb *** n00bs(even a couple with ridiculous post counts...hint hint troll) and misinformation in that thread.. Don't read that trash..
One key piece of advice, don't ever listen to anyone that tells you to do something. Listen to people who give you information on one or both routes..
The KA head flows 242cfm on the intake side, and 180cfm exhaust side. It could use some porting exhaust side, but it works. Some dumbass said "its made for sucking air in"..thats gotta be something he watched on N00bTV or something.. Flow numbers don't lie..thats how much air can go through it at a set vacuum. For comparison, the SR flows 209 intake and 160cfm..
http://www.ka-t.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16531
Informative thread about head numbers..
Okay..."made for boost"... Hmm
What in the **** does this mean..?? I don't get it.. They are both internal combustion engines. Each of them have identical cast aluminum pistons and forged steel rods.. The SR does have a lower compression ratio so you can run more boost on a given octane fuel. This is the idiot boundary for most ignorant SR owners thinking they can **** off and run 20+psi on turbos too small for that kind of pressure.. A KA will blow much quicker in that instance.. There is no "boost bolt" or "Boost bearing" that gets put into an engine that makes it "made for boost". **** the LS1 isn't made for boost, the Viper engine isn't made for boost, the LS2 and LS7 aren't made for boost, and even the B series blocks from Honda aren't "made for boost" But **** a lot of them make crap-tons of power regardless..
So yea, weigh your options. I think they are both great engines and you will be happy either route if you follow the directions.. But don't listen to people who talk about how many engines they have blown or who say "do this"... More than likely they are justifying a mistake they made..