I will say no more, as one of those sits in my garage.
I had one. It was AWESOME. I was 19 and "needed" a van to move the band around to our non-existent gigs. Ah, youth.gwoods wrote:I want the 12 second mini van
I agree with the most of that sleeper list but I dunno about that Ford LTD LX. Might be fun to list some of the others like:gwoods wrote:pics?
I rent the current dodge mini van when I can its fast for no reason 0-60 in 7 seconds for no reason at all.
I don't think I have any pics. I'd have to dig through my photo albums and look. That was back in the days of 35mm and before camera phones so I'm not even sure I have one. I know Dan probably has some but I have no idea how to get in contact with him anymore.gwoods wrote:pics?
I rent the current dodge mini van when I can its fast for no reason 0-60 in 7 seconds for no reason at all.
That last sentence...For two years, Dodge offered the Caravan with a turbocharged 2.5-liter Turbo II four and a five-speed stick. Cranked to a moderate boost of 12 psi, a largely stock Caravan turbo can hit the quarter mile deep into the 12s. Imagine the depression you’d kick off handing somebody’s a** to them in a wood-paneled, seven passenger loser cruiser.

I concur. The Omni GLH was my first introduction to drag racing in HS. A friend of mine kept trying to get me to come out to the track with him, was his Omni. I finally went and couldn't believe how fast that little fvcker was. It was able to trounce my 78 Monte without even trying.Bubba1 wrote: Dodge Omni GLH (yes, ugly little econobox but GLH stood for Goes like Hell).
WDRacing wrote:The Buick GS is NOT a sleeper. Not sure why that car is on the list at all.
Correct. However, since the article was just written about sleepers that include an 04 model, I figure it should be somewhat accurate. Pretty much all models of the GS are known to be fastasfvck vs whatever they come across on the daily 9-5 dash to and from work. Back in the day when compared to other muscle cars, maybe, but I still don't think they can be considered as a sleeper to anyone that's not a waterhead. The article was written for the gearhead audience, the author should have known better.Bubba1 wrote: You're probably not old enough, but the Buick GS really was considered a sleeper when they were new.
I agree.WDRacing wrote: Correct. However, since the article was just written about sleepers that include an 04 model, I figure it should be somewhat accurate. Pretty much all models of the GS are known to be fastasfvck vs whatever they come across on the daily 9-5 dash to and from work. Back in the day when compared to other muscle cars, maybe, but I still don't think they can be considered as a sleeper to anyone that's not a waterhead. The article was written for the gearhead audience, the author should have known better.

Word to your mother. My first car was a Contour SE, rather than an SVT, but it came with the same engine, and that little car was impressively quick. My dad, who owned it before me, actually bought it because he thought it was such a sleeper.BusyBadger wrote:I'm a little surprised that the SVT Contour didn't make the list. Numbers aren't jaw-dropping, but better than most would expect based on the packaging...bland, bland, bland.
I agree. I think my perception of a "sleeper" is similar to MoD's. That is, a car that is significantly quicker than it portrays itself to be. The SVT Contour was a fairly peppy car for what it was, but Ford added too many styling touches to it so you could tell from a distance it wasn't the more anemic base model version. So not a sleeperMinisterofDOOM wrote:I don't think the SVT Contour qualifies as sleeper. It's more like ricer. Enough flamboyant glued on bodywork for an entire Scion factory on one single car. It SCREAMS attentionwhore stoplight-racer.
Joel is dead-nuts on here.Bubba1 wrote:I agree. I think my perception of a "sleeper" is similar to MoD's. That is, a car that is significantly quicker than it portrays itself to be. The SVT Contour was a fairly peppy car for what it was, but Ford added too many styling touches to it so you could tell from a distance it wasn't the more anemic base model version. So not a sleeperMinisterofDOOM wrote:I don't think the SVT Contour qualifies as sleeper. It's more like ricer. Enough flamboyant glued on bodywork for an entire Scion factory on one single car. It SCREAMS attentionwhore stoplight-racer.




Dattebayo wrote:No way the Regal is a sleeper. Nope.

I'm older than you are.Repo Man wrote:How old are you two?
MinisterofDOOM wrote:It's more like ricer. Enough flamboyant glued on bodywork for an entire Scion factory on one single car. It SCREAMS attentionwhore stoplight-racer.
