MagicM wrote:Lotus is a british originating car, that should speak for itself on reliability.
MagicM wrote:Lotus is a british originating car, that should speak for itself on reliability.
SHIFT_2.5S wrote:Seems to me that you just answered your own question...
You're comparing 3 cars that cannot be compared because they are different and serve different purposes. You cannot have one excellent car that is perfect as a daily driver, works as a track car, functions as a "you-only-live-once" car and fits into your budget.
i would think the motor would be reliable because it uses a toyota motorMagicM wrote:Lotus is a british originating car, that should speak for itself on reliability.
If you see the majority of when cars breakdown, they are very rarely pure motor related. They are generally the parts,and how they are engineered in the vehicle that fail. Which the british/Europeans manufacturers arn't known to be very good at, hense why they are rated horribly reliablity wise. Having friends with european, and personally owning 2 range rovers i know first hand what kind of problems they hold. My 05 has a BMW X5 Engine which is said to be "bullet Proof" reliability wise, but yet the car is rated as the worst car in terms of reliablity, not because of engine, but because of the poor parts/ quality control that have been put into the car. Reliablity isn't just engine, but what the vehicle represents as a whole.kamikazestorm420 wrote:
i would think the motor would be reliable because it uses a toyota motor
It would only be fun until you start having severe back pains and will need to drive it to the chiropractor's office.Vet Boots wrote: But wouldn't it be fun????