Post by
s0m3th1ngAZ »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/s0m3th1ngaz-u27191.html
Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:14 am
Hate to bump this but, I was just reading a couple year old article outlining the severe lack of government oversight involving the return of citizens of New York to businesses and homes following the attacks. Pressured by the wealthy land owners surrounding Ground Zero, Guliani and even the local EPA office ignored repeated warnings by the regional EPA and other agencies that the area surrounding the site was still extremely hazardous even after the city promised it was safe to return to homes and businesses.
Now, I know the bill passed, but how come the people that willingly risked their lives are being compensated over citizens who were heavily mislead by their own government. Thousands of people who were told it was safe to return to residences (And hence pay rent again) are suffering severe problems brought on by aerosols produced by the building debris. That, to me, is a greater reason to compensate someone for their time than people who were doing their jobs.
Just trying to spark more debate:P