..... OH MY SIDES HURT!!!! And she's suing?????? ..... "Hey, who put this fountain in my way?!" ...... OH MAKE IT STOP - MY SIDES!!!!
Oh shizznappies, I can't stop laughing!AppleBonker wrote:Uh... she's not a girl. Woman is 44 years old, I think.
Also, a lawsuit hasn't been filed. She's considering it because no one helped her?
Helped her do what? Get out?! Dry off?! .......... RECOVER FROM HER OWN SELF-INDUCED EMBARASSMENT?!! .... .... OH THE PAIN! MAKE IT STOP! 
I like how she acted as nothing had happened. 
... Yep, I'm one million ONE!Marrero, who works at a store in the Berkshire mall in Wyomissing, admitted that she laughed, too, at first. But after being laughed at by millions, she said, no one has taken her feelings into consideration.
Buck it up Marrero! Thanks for the link!
I know you're not serious, but what could she expect for help? Was she going to drown in 18" of water or something?AppleBonker wrote: Also, a lawsuit hasn't been filed. She's considering it because no one helped her?
No, no no. The use of her image without her consent and to make fun of her. I didn't say she didn't deserve it, tho.Jesda wrote:Im not aware of any right to privacy when youre wandering around a public space, especially if that public space is privately owned.
How so? You can't even tell it's her from the quality of the video. And Jesda's right in that being it's a privately owned mall open to the public, I'll bet there are visual signs posted somewhere near the entrances that state you are under surveillance. Therefore your rights are relinquished just by entering the mall. Does she have a case ... maybe ... with the right attorney; but I don't think it's THAT cut and dry, nor worth the battle unless the attorney is good enough to push for an out-of-court settlement. The only thing that I could see being a legal issue is that somehow the video sneaked out of the security room; that in and of itself I'm sure breaks some sort of mall-cop terms of employment or conduct code. And that's got nothing to do with her.Dattebayo wrote:She does have the right to sue about the video, ya know.
It's pretty cut and dry legal right there.
So you think any one of those security workers can take a clip of you scratching your nuts and just post it on their facebook anytime they want? LOLscotty-2-forty wrote:And Jesda's right in that being it's a privately owned mall open to the public, I'll bet there are visual signs posted somewhere near the entrances that state you are under surveillance.
I don't think so. From what I understand, she is only suing because the video was used in a manner inconsistent with what it was intended for.scotty-2-forty wrote:Therefore your rights are relinquished just by entering the mall.
Uh what? Where did I say it was OK for security to release the video? And again, you can't even tell who it is in the video. Whatever ... you're right, I'm wrong ... feel better now?Dattebayo wrote:So you think any one of those security workers can take a clip of you scratching your nuts and just post it on their facebook anytime they want? LOLscotty-2-forty wrote:And Jesda's right in that being it's a privately owned mall open to the public, I'll bet there are visual signs posted somewhere near the entrances that state you are under surveillance.
These kind of suits are actually pretty common.
I don't think so. From what I understand, she is only suing because the video was used in a manner inconsistent with what it was intended for.scotty-2-forty wrote:Therefore your rights are relinquished just by entering the mall.
themadscientist wrote:I would like to see frivolous lawsuit legislation enacted. I am tired of stupid fornicates being able to sue others for their own stupidity. I hope a teenager falling out of a passing plane's landing gear crushes her a** and the city sues bothe people's families for staining the sidewalk.
... oh this thread ... 
I read she said she hired an attorny after feeling humiliation on a big scale by the mall security's decision to post it on youtube without her consent or knowledge. The Security guards were wrong for publishing it. but I dont know if what they did was illegal considering how far away she was from the camera. Her appearance on Good Morning America did not help her.AppleBonker wrote:Uh... she's not a girl. Woman is 44 years old, I think.
Also, a lawsuit hasn't been filed. She's considering it because no one helped her?
Not to mention you can't tell who she is in the video either...except her coming forward about it publicly then negated that. Dumbass.Jesda wrote:Im not aware of any right to privacy when youre wandering around a public space, especially if that public space is privately owned.
