girl falls into mall fountain - texting while walking

[alms24sebring]

That counts as a shower!!

That was also funny. The janitor had no idea. I would have pointed and laughed as I would have the right to after seeing something that stupid

[driverdriver]

That's very funny.

[PalmerWMD]

She does have the right to sue about the video, ya know.

It's pretty cut and dry legal right there.

there is no right to privacy in public.
And whoever takes an image owns the copy right to it as long it was lawfully obtained

[ricebike]

so it's on the local radio talk show... NJ101.5

found out that they already fired the guard that took this video with his cellphone

i see the replies on that youtube sight that she may be trying to get some funds from this as well to help pay for the past crimes that she did.... BOO!

offtopic: wassup, fellow OG

[Dattebayo]

there is no right to privacy in public.

That's true to an extent.

And whoever takes an image owns the copy right to it as long it was lawfully obtained

It wasn't. That's why I said what I did. Anyone else wanna talk about it?

[PalmerWMD]

there is no right to privacy in public.

That's true to an extent.

And whoever takes an image owns the copy right to it as long it was lawfully obtained

It wasn't. That's why I said what I did. Anyone else wanna talk about it?

Hmm, I thouht it was a mall survelleianc evideo.
As for cellphone it was in the public domain so no right to privacy.
I know there have been attempts to water this down lately in this country mostly to protect women from "mistakes" but I dont think they ahve been successul in changing this basic principleyet.

PS: Hi back at you too Ricebike

[alms24sebring]

Cellphone vid?! Why is it so steady? And how did he know that there was a dumb girl abroad? I mean, was he just taping for the hell of it and caught something hystarically funny?

[themadscientist]

Cell phone recording a security camera feed. That is the crux of the problem. That original video was not the property of the person who released the unauthorized copy of it, but rather the mall. He messed up in that respect. She messed up by being her.

[scotty-2-forty]

Instead of filing a suit, she should have asked for a copy of the tape and sent it in to AFV.

^FTW! Probably could have won some cash to pay off her previous stupidities.

[RicerX]

I can't help but think the only thing that could cause the government to pass legislation that would ban lawsuits deemed frivolous is if Brett Favre tries to sue God for making him too old to play in the NFL.

[MinisterofDOOM]

Not to mention you can't tell who she is in the video either...except her coming forward about it publicly then negated that. Dumbass.

Stick a big red button in front of someone and they'll push it eventually. People are dumb. They're driven to do dumb things. I say we give them all cliffs and wait patiently.

[scotty-2-forty]

Oh thank GOD I'm not a people ...

[xKnownShadowX]

I would've started swimming in there lol.Wonder how here text came out!!!LOL

"Hey, I'm on lunch now fsafjsakfhkdsahfdjdsfjsd sgarrrla....."

Hahahaha...........

[Dattebayo]

Cell phone recording a security camera feed. That is the crux of the problem. That original video was not the property of the person who released the unauthorized copy of it, but rather the mall. He messed up in that respect. She messed up by being her.

^THIS.

I wish I had the level of communication that you did right there.

[Jesda]

The mall can do whatever it wants with its security footage. It doesnt need her permission to publish what it collected. The only point of conflict would be between the mall and the security officer.

This is why the lawsuit was dropped.

[alms24sebring]

yeah I guess thats true. But still, theres no reason to SUE somebody for that. That makes her even stupider.

^ lol good point

[Gabes13]

The janitor's name is Pedro?

[EvoTyler]

didn't it come out after she threatened a law suit that she's actually guilty of identity theft too?