adidas2go wrote:
This is true to some extent. However there are many supercharger systems that add a 45%+ hp increase to 4 cyl applications. The parasitic effects of a supercharger aren't devestating, but they are there. A turbo uses wasted exhaust fumes to spin the turbine, to charge the air. A supercharger uses the engines own accessory belt, with the added s/c pulley, to spin a shaft, which spins the turbine. A bigger 4 cyliner, like the 2.5, has the power to spin up a s/c. However a smaller engine, like the 1.6L hondas and such, don't have the power output to spin all the accessory belts and a s/c proficently enough to warrant a supercharger.
The biggest thing to remember about the power difference between turbo and a centrifugal Votec S/C besides how the unit is driven is when it kicks in boost. Once a turbo is spooled up the wastegate regulates boost at a sertain psi and keeps it there, the s/c only sees peak boost at redline. Back when I had the scion the debate about power was always disputed, but some of us where so fortunite to go down to the track and race each other.
The prime example is a tC with a TRD (vortec) s/c with a 9.5psi pulley vs a turbo set at 8psi. The s/c tC with supporting mods (I,H,E) pulled 232whp while the turbo pushed 228whp (stock exhaust) both on a dynoJet and peak power numbers. The race was even close. My best time was a 14.8## while the turbo was posting 13.9-14.0, both on street tires. Let me tell you 1.0sec is a huge gap between cars. Now I never once disputed the argument of which made more useable power. The power curve on a turbo has a hug hump in the midrange while the s/c was extremely linear. I think the CVT guys would narrow the gap by a lot on the A/C's just because the s/c won't let up once the rpm hits peak.
Still looking forward to the Vortec Unit over anything else.