So... where do I look to find load rating specs? Sounds like this is important... I don't want to mess it up.nchopp wrote:As to load ratings for our Iowa class battleship on land, yes, 95 is the minimum. But if you plan on any high-speed jaunts, higher is definitely a good plan.
Youll see the tire size, and then a "code"..... so youll see 225-45-18 (my front tires) and then a 95Y.. Means they are Y speed rated, and have a load rating of 95... Many Z rated tires do not have load rating.sceningolmo wrote:So... where do I look to find load rating specs? Sounds like this is important... I don't want to mess it up.
That's interesting ... I'd like to see pics. of both the fit/clearance and the rolling. Given those wheel widths/ tire sizes, those are "stretched" a bit, aren't they?G50 Q wrote:Hmmm
that's interesting... I just put the following on my G50 with little to no issues:
18x9 +10 front 225/4018x10 +10 rear 245/40
Obviously both the front and rear fenders were rolled, took about 10min per fender, and the rear camber was dialed in a bit.
The front could easily come out another 5-10mm if i had some way to adjust front camber... hopefully i will soon.
I'll try to take some pics tomorrow... my intake mani is off right now because i'm replacing hoses/injectors. But i think i can take some ok pics with it in the garage.Rex wrote:
That's interesting ... I'd like to see pics. of both the fit/clearance and the rolling. Given those wheel widths/ tire sizes, those are "stretched" a bit, aren't they?
So, you're not experiencing any front rub, even on lock to lock or over bump/through deep dips?
Looking forward to some pics, do you have a "ball park" idea how much additional clearance you got by rolling the fenders? And are you familiar with onetongarage?G50 Q wrote:I'll try to take some pics tomorrow... my intake mani is off right now because i'm replacing hoses/injectors. But i think i can take some ok pics with it in the garage.
Yes, the tires are a bit stretched... front doesn't rub at all.... rear just a little, which i plan to fix soon with a bit more neg camber.
ummm ballpark maybe 10-15mm maybe more for the rear.....Rex wrote:
Looking forward to some pics, do you have a "ball park" idea how much additional clearance you got by rolling the fenders? And are you familiar with onetongarage?
What all did you do to the rear fenders? Just a good roll?q45VIP wrote:18x9 +5 off. 225/40 no fender work,-2.50 camber.18x10 -5 off.235/40fender work required,-3.75 camber.
Cut, pull and weld. I probably could have roll and pull some but, I didnt want to run crazy amounts of neg.camber.PLus Im going to lower it more and need more clearence.G50 Q wrote:
What all did you do to the rear fenders? Just a good roll?
HA that's funny, my roomate was trying to convince me to do that to both my front and rear fenders... he has a welder and offer to do that part, however I'm not all about repainting 2 of my cars right now. However, I would need to run a spacer in the front and back for it to look right, either that or get some lower offset wheels....muhahahaq45VIP wrote:
Cut, pull and weld. I probably could have roll and pull some but, I didnt want to run crazy amounts of neg.camber.PLus Im going to lower it more and need more clearence.
Yeah, that's a little more "work" than I want to do to my wheel wells . Interesting that you needed to do that much, but G 50 says he only rolled his ... unless I don't "understadn" the use of the term "rolled".q45VIP wrote:Cut, pull and weld. I probably could have roll and pull some but, I didnt want to run crazy amounts of neg.camber.PLus Im going to lower it more and need more clearence.
Well he has roughly 10mm LESS clearence than I do. So, my wheel/tire combo sits 10mm (again roughly) further in. Also, He could have probably gotten away with out all of that work if he was willing to run a good amount a camber. But he said he didn't want to do that.Rex wrote:
Yeah, that's a little more "work" than I want to do to my wheel wells . Interesting that you needed to do that much, but G 50 says he only rolled his ... unless I don't "understadn" the use of the term "rolled".
Looking to better understand what some of the wider fitment requirements are.
I had a set of G35 coupe 7 spoke 17" (7.5F, 8R) and had just the slightest rub, from what I understand the G35 sedan wheels have a better offset.silentfurymm wrote:Holy tire stretch batman!
Seriously thought, this is an interesting thread. I was unsure how easily stock G35 17X8 rims would fit, and it seems like the answer is very easy.
1.) One gets what one pays for.elwesso wrote:1.) I dont like tirerack or discount tire's wheels because all the ones in a decent price range are cheap quality and way too heavy...
2.) My friend from indy had a set of enkei wheels, those are known as really good wheels... he spent over a grand on the wheel/tire combo... 2 of the wheels cracked.....
Great way to lose the superior Nissan double galvanization and encourage corrosion.q45VIP wrote:Cut, pull and weld. I probably could have roll and pull some but, I didnt want to run crazy amounts of neg.camber.
No need to worry about corrosion here in AZI got to worry about the damn heatmaxnix wrote:
Great way to lose the superior Nissan double galvanization and encourage corrosion.
I was thinking the same thing, your car is black on black, right?q45VIP wrote:No need to worry about corrosion here in AZI got to worry about the damn heat