G50 Successor

A Q45 forum / Cima forum for the President of Infiniti's lineup. Brought to you by Infiniti Parts USA, your OEM source for Q45 parts!
User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

The spiritual successor to the G50 is the E38 BMW 7-series and E39 5-series.


qship96
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 11:31 am
Car: 1996 Infiniti Q45

Post

I think the Audi A8L is the modern day Q....the BMW is too techy and overcomplicated to carry on the spirit of a G50

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

qship96 wrote:I think the Audi A8L is the modern day Q....the BMW is too techy and overcomplicated to carry on the spirit of a G50
Audi A8 is way too unreliable and too costly to repair according to the A* forums I have read. And any car with most of it's engine in front of the front axle.......

I have to say the new Genesis V8 may be the sleeper if firmer springs and shocks come from the aftermarket.

Or the new M50 with the 7 speed auto, but no VLSD.

Actually the E550 is interesting too as it is dimensionally similar, faster, 7 speed auto but I think only available with air suspension. New one due very soon.

User avatar
Peterofdevon
Posts: 388
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:33 am
Car: 94T 70K, miss mannors, 96 Black on Black 72K, raw sex

Post

qship96 wrote:I think the Audi A8L is the modern day Q....the BMW is too techy and overcomplicated to carry on the spirit of a G50
The new 7 series may change our minds.

Peter

NightRiderQ45
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:00 am
Car: 1998 Infiniti Q45
Location: Houston, TX

Post

maxnix wrote:I have to say the new Genesis V8 may be the sleeper if firmer springs and shocks come from the aftermarket.
This car keeps coming up so I'm sorry but I have to be the negative one here. I have a friend that is a engineer for Hyundai and also a friend that is an operator at one of their plants and they both said that they wouldn't purchase that car. The engineer said that they basically tried to copy "certain" cars concepts and apply it to this car. I mean, if you take the time the look at it, you can see "certain" cars just by the body alone. Plus for $40k...ummm I would stick with Infiniti/Lexus. I wanted to purchase the Mercedes CLS550, but I read too many horror reliability stories with that model..even worse with the CLS500. My next purchase will either be some type of Infiniti or the Lexus GS350.

NightRiderQ45
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:00 am
Car: 1998 Infiniti Q45
Location: Houston, TX

Post

Peterofdevon wrote:
The new 7 series may change our minds.

Peter
They have a new 7 series coming out!!!! Where is it, where is it!?!?!?!?!?

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

NightRiderQ45 wrote:The engineer said that they basically tried to copy "certain" cars concepts and apply it to this car.
I wonder whose front suspension with 4 ball joints and forged aluminum arms they copied?

qship96
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 11:31 am
Car: 1996 Infiniti Q45

Post

2009 bmw 7 hits showrooms in March 2009.....only engine at release will be 4.4 twinturbo v8.....sounds like a great overstressed overcomplicated powertrain good for the short term lease set- would love to see how that fares at typical g50 engine longeity standards{300-350Kmiles}

My 96Q motor at 218K uses less than 1/2 quart of oil in 5,000 miles and other than 1 pair of knock sensors and 1 TPS, has required NOTHING other than sparkplugs, oil changes, and one reseal of valve covers.

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

There are no overengineered V8 made any more unless it is the Porsche non-turbo charged one as it is also a closed deck design. Maybe the Aston Martin V8? Probably the Koenigsegg! Have to wait on the AMG 6.2L. Very nice design, though.

The Hyundai Tau V8 looks like they incorporated the best practices of many and the initial results speak for themselves.

qship96
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 11:31 am
Car: 1996 Infiniti Q45

Post

My friends 06 750li has visited the dealer over and over for frustrating electrical issues....excuse always seems to be "we needed to reflash and update the computer"......geez, sounds more like he bought a computer system with windows vista than a $85,000 car..... oil monitor is telling him to change oil/filter at average of 16,000-18,000 miles,and he is following it! Since the car has no oil dipstick,owners cant even get a peak at how filthy disguting it must look by 1/3 that amount of miles{planned for that reason I would guess} the 50,000 mile "free" servicing doesnt mean much at those intervals!!!

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

FYI - I split this thread out as it became it's own vein of conversation.

qship96
Posts: 6624
Joined: Sun Nov 24, 2002 11:31 am
Car: 1996 Infiniti Q45

Post

Brian, what I find interesting with the new genesis v8 is how small the difference in advertised power is between using regular fuel{368hp} compared to premium fuel{375hp}.....if accurate,using regular fuel seems a no brainer for that miniscule difference.

User avatar
slybydesignq45t
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:27 am
Car: City Bus

Post

Believe it or not I was hired by a private party (Hourly) to learn how to use/drive a 2008 LS460. It is one of my favorite designed cars of today. The owner has passed me every single document, manual, cd that came with the car. As a car guy I was pleased. The LS460 is a super tech car that needs that kind of learning approach. I am very impressed with the amenities and interior design all around. This weekend I will drive it. There seems to be minimal technical issues with the LS460 as I am a part of that forum too.

One thing I can't get over is how most cars of today utilize many design aspects of the Q45 and Q45T. The size of the car is great and smooth ride and power are of todays standards. If your lucky and have a very clean one, then some people can't even tell its a mid 90's car. But if they are left looking crappy then the age shows, like a celebrity .

Many cars like the 300m/c, BMW 7 series and w220 pull up next to me or speed up to me and ride with me for a couple of seconds then zoom off. I feel bad when Camry's do it because I'm like "Nope" , I feel embarrassed when Bentlys do it , but all in all if you was to modernize the G50 with all the bells and whistles you would have an up to date car that can with stand the test of time.

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

qship96 wrote:I think the Audi A8L is the modern day Q....the BMW is too techy and overcomplicated to carry on the spirit of a G50
Of current offerings, I think I agree. A friend of mine had an E65 and was too happy to get rid of it. It was ugly and a nightmare. Guys on the forum call it the worst thing BMW ever built.

The E38 that preceded it was among the finest luxury cars ever made. I got to spend a couple hours flogging a V12 long-wheelbase version, and it is up there as being one of the nicest cars I've ever driven.



Oh yeah, V12 gets 23mpg on the highway.

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

Rex wrote:FYI - I split this thread out as it became it's own vein of conversation.
Good job, Rex!


maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

qship96 wrote:Brian, what I find interesting with the new genesis v8 is how small the difference in advertised power is between using regular fuel{368hp} compared to premium fuel{375hp}.....if accurate,using regular fuel seems a no brainer for that miniscule difference.
That intrigues me also. For 7% less fuel expense, those 7 ponies won't be missed that much.

User avatar
sijoko
Posts: 961
Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2002 6:54 am
Car: Black 1994 Infiniti Q45 Turbo, Pearl White 2014 Maxima Sport
Contact:

Post

Jesda wrote:
Of current offerings, I think I agree. A friend of mine had an E65 and was too happy to get rid of it. It was ugly and a nightmare. Guys on the forum call it the worst thing BMW ever built.

The E38 that preceded it was among the finest luxury cars ever made. I got to spend a couple hours flogging a V12 long-wheelbase version, and it is up there as being one of the nicest cars I've ever driven.



Oh yeah, V12 gets 23mpg on the highway.
This 7 series is the best one ever. All the ones after it have been atrocious with goofy angles and too much techno wizardry.

User avatar
Q451990
Moderator
Posts: 11033
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 8:21 am
Car: 1990 Q45 - 118K, 2022 Toyota 4 Runner, 2004 Frontier M/T - 108K, 2012 Xterra (Mom's), 2023 Rogue (Inlaws)
Location: Columbia, SC
Contact:

Post

slybydesignq45t wrote:Believe it or not I was hired by a private party (Hourly) to learn how to use/drive a 2008 LS460. It is one of my favorite designed cars of today. The owner has passed me every single document, manual, cd that came with the car.
Could you expand on this a bit?

On one hand, having to hire a tutor to wade through the bells and whistles is a little scary - on the other hand, where do I send my resume?!

Heath

User avatar
gammer_ghn
Posts: 2046
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:39 pm

Post

November La auto show! My friend works with the Nissan and Infiniti department of the show and he tells me of a new Q which will have a brother with a turbo charger as a higher spec option! So the G50 is just arriving if you asking me?! Since initially the old G50 is a 4.5L. 2 months left till we see whats up.

User avatar
Infinitiguy19
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:58 pm
Car: 1993 Infiniti Q45 188580 Miles
1994 Infiniti Q45a 240000 Miles

Post

O man please tell me they will rethink the turbo and add a super charger instead or a turbo/super charger setup (Low RPM super charger/High RPM Turbo).

User avatar
gammer_ghn
Posts: 2046
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:39 pm

Post

Well if i was sure his for real ide be spilling my guts here my friend! No but his my coworkers brother and this kid is a good kid... Funny how im calling a 26 year old a kid haha. No but Nissan killed turbo lag off of the GTR so i think they have something up there sleeve like fuel economy till 2500RPM than sheer madness after 3000? I can work with that! defiantly.

User avatar
Infinitiguy19
Posts: 7787
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:58 pm
Car: 1993 Infiniti Q45 188580 Miles
1994 Infiniti Q45a 240000 Miles

Post

Wonder how they did. They must have used a smaller turbo to spool up the bigger one faster I would think, But I will read up on it.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

qship96 wrote:I think the Audi A8L is the modern day Q....the BMW is too techy and overcomplicated to carry on the spirit of a G50
E65/66, yes. The E38 NO. The E38 is a car very much in the same vein as the G50: it's a low, wide, powerful luxury car that's designed to entertain the driver even more than it does the passengers. They're fantastic handling cars and are NOT anaesthetized by excessive gadgets like the E65/66 is.

I have a lot of love for the A8 as well, though.
NightRiderQ45 wrote:They have a new 7 series coming out!!!! Where is it, where is it!?!?!?!?!?
zerothread?id=367340
NightRiderQ45 wrote:Plus for $40k...ummm I would stick with Infiniti/Lexus.
I agree that the Genesis doesn't really belong in any discussion of BMW/Audi/Infiniti competitors or "spiritual successors," but I don't agree with this point at all. $40k doesn't get you much Infiniti or Lexus at all. A G37 or IS350 (eeeew) cost nearly $40k and they're TINY and ugly. The IS may as well have been a 2 seat coupe for all the viability of it's rear seats. The G isn't as bad but is still far from roomy. A GS costs $45k for a BASE V6. M35 a couple grand less. The Genesis is bigger and more powerful than all these cars.

Still, the Genesis is clearly a luxury people mover and NOT an enthusiast toy, so it'll likely never end up in my garage. But to say that for the price you'd rather go with an established luxury brand is silly. The Genesis is close to HALF the price of it's competition.

User avatar
gammer_ghn
Posts: 2046
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:39 pm

Post

Nuff said. saw one on the street... Not impressed


NightRiderQ45
Posts: 969
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 11:00 am
Car: 1998 Infiniti Q45
Location: Houston, TX

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:$40k doesn't get you much Infiniti or Lexus at all. A G37 or IS350 (eeeew) cost nearly $40k and they're TINY and ugly. The IS may as well have been a 2 seat coupe for all the viability of it's rear seats. The G isn't as bad but is still far from roomy. A GS costs $45k for a BASE V6. M35 a couple grand less. The Genesis is bigger and more powerful than all these cars.
Are you serious?? $40k will get you any car in the Infiniti line up! You must be speaking of brand new cars!? Sorry, I don't and will never purchased a new car with 0 mileage. You can find used cars with low mileage and great maintenance performed to it and your are good. I'll let the idiot previous owner take the depreciation hit as soon as he drives the new car off of the lot. The Lexus GS350 has less hp, but who cares. That will probably be my next purchase and yes you can find those for around $40k. I will never purchase a Hyundai and especially this Genesis for $40k!

Thanks for the link to the new 7 series but unfortunately I was highly dissapointed!! I like the version before this one better! The tail lights look horrible and from the side profile view, it looks like the Lexus LS 460!!!

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Ahh, well I assumed that since you were comparing to the Genesis (which can only be had NEW at this point) you were talking new all around.

I'm right there with you as far as not buying new cars. There are plenty of used Infinitis and Cadillacs that'll keep me happy for less than a new car.

Funny that you say the profile view of the new 7 looks like the LS when the side profile of the LS is IDENTICAL to the LAST 7, which has a much different profile than the new one. A while back when the current LS debuted, someone here posted a picture that overlaid the two cars (E65 and LS) and the profiles were a dead match--down to the trunk lid lip spoilers. I'll see if I can find it.

EDITHere it is:



and separate:



Here's the original thread:zerothread?id=195198

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

That's very interesting.

I originally thought the NICO chaffeur was speaking of a LS430 because the LS460 is a much larger car and in no way comparable to the G50 - too techno, too soft handling, too heavy. Even the LS430 is noticeably larger. Why I suggested the MB E series or even the 5er which are almost identical to the G50 in wheelbase and weight.

User avatar
slybydesignq45t
Posts: 356
Joined: Wed Jun 04, 2008 9:27 am
Car: City Bus

Post

Holy Scrap Yard Batmen. Wow. I wonder if you can do that image comparison with the new Honda Accord, Nissan Maxima and BMW 5 Series....

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

slybydesignq45t wrote: I wonder if you can do that image comparison with the new Honda Accord, Nissan Maxima and BMW 5 Series....
The first two are apples and the last one is an orange.


Return to “Q45 Forum / Cima Forum”