What Bud said.Cold_Zero wrote:I realize that this is a highly subjective topic. Jesda, the majority of your list bores me. I am shocked that the TT Supra was not on anyone's list. It is already a classic and will continue to be a classic. I thought that one was a no brainer. I think that you underestimate the 240SX. Right now, the car is a cult classic. But in the future, when all of the enthusiasts get older and want to relive their youth, I think that these cars will be in an even higher demand. When I look at a 240SX I dont see performance numbers, I see a good looking car that is a blast to drive. In my book it will be a classic.bud
Nope. nice car, not collectible.AZhitman wrote:^ Screen name reminds me, what about the MkIII Supra?
Pure hotness.
Making them worth a whopping $700.(j/k). I suspect Hemmings was referring to non-abused stock ones which are rapidly becoming endangered species.ScorchedMk3 wrote:any of you read hemmings motor news?it listed the 1984-1987 corolla ae86 as an upcoming collectors car, boosting the value a good 500 bucks already.
memory rush. Gotta go looking in my old photo album. My sister actually owned a Datsun 610 coupe. Brown with a tan vinyl interior. Reliable, but not a fun car to drive. Very slow, didn't handle very well, seats were awful. 4 speed manual. The inside windows would get this nasty film whenever it got hot. She traded it on a Corrolla, and never looked back.Mr1der wrote:haha...
my friend is soon to be swapping a supercharged MR2 4AGE into one...mwhahahahah.
they're all rusty. a non rusted one is would be killer.
it's getting that because of all the Initial Dorks out there...
what about the Datsun 610...never hear anything about them...first Silvia we got over here.
I might be wrong, but I think it was a tuned version of the old 2.2 omni motor. the one I drive was an automatic. I don't think a stick was even offered. This goes back a few years but I remember the seats were pretty comfortable and there was a nice nice clock in the center of the dash, but the car was very unimpressive.Mr1der wrote:did it have the damn turbo 2.5 in it?
No, all the body panels are different, along with the paint and most interior parts. They have a fiercely dedicated following.AZhitman wrote:IIRC, the TC, although touted as "hand-built" by Maserati, is nothing more than a chopped LeBaron. I believe it shares several panels and switchgear.
I've always enjoyed Alfas, working for a fiat/lancia dealer, I came across a ton of them. Drove several. That is so true about the electical gremlins. I always liked the spider veloce's, (the older boat tails,not the later cam-backs. Not a particularly sophisticated or fast car, but it made all the right sounds and it was fun to drive.Meantime wrote:Alfa 164 - classy looks, great V6 engine, great handling, beautiful interior, rare now although most of the ones were well taken care of.
Like all Italian cars, has so many electrical gremlins that one would expect Keebler cookies to come out of the glovebox. But I'd still like to own one someday, alongside the ultra-rare Citröen CX wagon sold in the early '90s out of one dealer in PA.
I think you're right about the panels being different. The problem was it looked and performed way too much like an ordinary LeBaron which was less than half the price. TC's may have a fiercely dedicated following but it hasn't translated into collectibility. You can buy a decent TC for under $5K. that's not very good for such a rare car.Jesda wrote:
No, all the body panels are different, along with the paint and most interior parts. They have a fiercely dedicated following.
You worked for a Lancia dealer eh? Then you'll probably recognize this one:Bubba1 wrote:
I've always enjoyed Alfas, working for a fiat/lancia dealer, I came across a ton of them. Drove several. That is so true about the electical gremlins. I always liked the spider veloce's, (the older boat tails,not the later cam-backs. Not a particularly sophisticated or fast car, but it made all the right sounds and it was fun to drive.
The Maserati Bi-turbo is actually the LEAST collectible of all Maserati's.The Merak is not much better Yeah, I drove a Biturbo. (but not a merak) not a particularly fast car, and smaller it looks. I have also driven a Maserati Khamsin several times. (which is collectible) Lotsa torque, Fun car, but it was heavy. A real beast when the engine is cold.
Oh yeah. I drove several Scorpions. Very tossable but very underpowered. Very poor sellers. Funky looking interiors. They were originally going to be next generation X1/9, but it never panned out, very poor marketing back then. Of the Lancias they were selling back then, I actually preferred the Lancia beta HPE (extended hatchback/pseudo wagon) better than the scorpion. They sold even fewer HPE's than scorpions. The Beta coupes were the big sellers. They were such fragile cars. Not well built. I suppose the Scorpion and HPE would be low end collectibles in this country. The scorpion actually sold pretty well in Europe (over there it was called "Monte Carlo")Meantime wrote:
You worked for a Lancia dealer eh? Then you'll probably recognize this one:
Front photo:
Lancia Scorpion. Very rare in the States, I've only seen one on the road.
Far as Masers go, my personal favorite is the Ghibli. Ugly name, but one of the sexiest cars ever made. The Bora is a close second.