MinisterofDOOM wrote:Yes, you're right: they've simply narrowed their lineup to the real big sellers. There's nothing wrong with that from a business standpoint. It's just sad, especially with cars like the Supra in their past.
Well, with the new car market facing ever-declining sales numbers, I'd say that any company that wants to weather the storm should probably look into a similar strategy, however sad it may be to enthusiasts.
Now's not the time to market a niche performance car - especially if your core lineup is failing. Similar to the Solstice/Sky launch a couple years ago. GM has been bleeding cash for quite a while now, and a low-volume roadster would obviously not fix their balance sheet. A proper subcompact, compact, and midsize were the order of the day - and all they managed was the new Malibu, too little, too late. But I digress.
Toyota did have plans to develop a RWD coupe with Subaru, expected sometime around 2010-11, but of course, in light of the downturn, it's been shelved for now. Some sweet concept renderings are out there for anyone interested.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with your stance, but if Nissan needs to go conservative (save for the beautiful 370Z) for a couple years to stay afloat, then I'd rather them do that then go under with an 'interesting' lineup.
MinisterofDOOM wrote:Today, Chevy's V6 AND 4cylinder are superior (smoother, torquier, more reliable). The Chevy looks better. It's just as reliable. It's a lot more fun, can be had with interior appointments that are just as nice...They've lost their edge on the market
EcoTec I4s are anything but smooth. Just a few years back they still felt purpose-built for agriculture use. NVH is still a nagging issue with GM I4s, and even the CTS's 3.6L V6 has had many NVH complaints (acknowledged by GM).
I do think the new Malibu is a fine looking sedan, but unfortunately, it's just too little, too late. Toyota shored up the auto-transmission issues with the current-gen Camry within the first year, and now sites like TrueDelta report it having very good reliability. The Saturn Aura, which is mechanically related to the Malibu, has not fared as well on the same site.
Other than that, you're comparing the Aveo (a South Korean revolution) to the Yaris (no contest for the Yaris) and the Cavali...I mean Cobalt with the Corolla. Unless you want the ghetto blaster Cobalt SS for sheer thrust, the Corolla is a more refined (yes, boring) vehicle with less Wal-Mart stigma inside and out.
Last time I checked, GM has continued to lose their edge on the market - in fact, it's been a pretty continual downhill slide for the past few decades, due in no small part to piss-poor management, shoddy reliability in key market segments (trucks alone do not a car company make), and did I mention piss-poor management?
Not that Toyota has been on an ever-steady quality-climb, as I agree wholeheartedly with you that their mid-90s lineup probably had more 'quality' for the buck than today's. Toyota could care less about GM though, Hyundai probably appears to be much more threatening on a different scale - some of Hyundai's offerings have the appearance of being "mid-90s" Toyota quality for even less coin.
By the way, I'm not really trying to debate here, I just love talking cars, Nissans or otherwise.