How can you give up when you weren't in the discussion?Dattebayo wrote: I give up.
And sometimes snapping off the lug nuts, or warping your brake rotors, no?krash wrote:Its kind of like how the FSM tells you to torque the lug nut bolts to a specific measurement, but an experienced wrencher has no problem slamming that sucker with an impact wrench.
That's because nothing will go wrong on the ATC side. The dad has a mic on and active at the same time.szhosain wrote:And, by the way, this ATC did it twice - he brought his daughter in the next day to do the same.
Z
I see what you're saying, but if you work on cars alot and have experience (not you personally), you know when to stop tightening. With his experience, he knew what to let the kid do and what not to let the kid do.szhosain wrote:
And sometimes snapping off the lug nuts, or warping your brake rotors, no?
Oh, really? Can you guarantee that?PoorManQ45 wrote:That's because nothing will go wrong on the ATC side.
I can guarantee that a qualified ATC will react how they were trained if a situation occurs.szhosain wrote:
Oh, really? Can you guarantee that?
The ATC staff themselves cannot, you know.
Z
What if the ATC hears the child say one thing, and for whatever reason, the pilot hears something different and an accident happens? The ATC would not have any indication of a possible issue till too late perhaps!PoorManQ45 wrote:I can guarantee that a qualified ATC will react how they were trained if a situation occurs.
Then you do not get it. It means everything if there is a problem of any kind - however remote the possibility.PoorManQ45 wrote:The fact that the son was on the Mic means nothing.
The situation occurring while the ATC is actively, willingly, and knowingly violating FAA rules exposes, him, his bosses, and the company to unnecessary liability.PoorManQ45 wrote:
I can guarantee that a qualified ATC will react how they were trained if a situation occurs.
The fact that the son was on the Mic means nothing.
I think that's the problem. These days kids aren't allowed to have fun like they used to.King Ranzo wrote:the dad was just trying to let his son have a little fun..
How can that be? I mean, you two are allowed to play on the Internet.PoorManQ45 wrote:
I think that's the problem. These days kids aren't allowed to have fun like they used to.
I think you have it backwards. The problem these days is that kids can go around and do whatever the hell they want. Discipline in my generation is scarce.PoorManQ45 wrote:
I think that's the problem. These days kids aren't allowed to have fun like they used to.
I agree to some extent. Nothing bad did happen, and from my point of view (I am neither pilot nor ATC) I would agree that the kid probably didn't cause any issues.King Ranzo wrote:This "incident" is stupid and just needs to be forgotten about because nothing bad happened and the dad was just trying to let his son have a little fun. And quite frankly, the kid did a good job from what I can see.