NO!!! Displacement doesn't nessary mean more hp. Most civics have good cam timing, Honda is all about make more power using its cams in a better way, if would call it like that. VTEC....HELLO..Variable Valve Timing & Electronic Control look at the F1 race cars..2.4 v12.fatboy wrote:200whp is believable. ****, tons of guys are pushing 200whp in civics with less displacement!
you've heard "theres no replacement for displacement" right? well, its pretty true.Mr.Sandman wrote:NO!!! Displacement doesn't nessary mean more hp. Most civics have good cam timing, Honda is all about make more power using its cams in a better way, if would call it like that. VTEC....HELLO..Variable Valve Timing & Electronic Control look at the F1 race cars..2.4 v12.
Nice comeback. Please... explain.fatboy wrote:you've heard "theres no replacement for displacement" right? well, its pretty true.
Eh, not really.Mr.Sandman wrote:NO!!! Displacement doesn't nessary mean more hp. Most civics have good cam timing, Honda is all about make more power using its cams in a better way, if would call it like that. VTEC....HELLO..Variable Valve Timing & Electronic Control look at the F1 race cars..2.4 v12.
Nice math, but horsepower is a BYPRODUCT of torque (i.e. horsepower= torque/5252) and it is much easier to achieve more torque from a large displacement engine. There is no replacement for displacement. bottom line. Alot of people say technology or turbos are the replacements for it so I say go race a turbo V8 in a turbo 4 cylinder and let me know who wins You could also just ask Aries to race his S14 is NA but its also an LT or LS1 not sure which. Do a search and you can find some of his vids at the track.InsanityInc wrote:
Eh, not really.
More displacement = more torque potential. Also, F1 NA engines are 3.0L, and they aren't all V12s. The reason why they're V12s specifically is so that the stroke can be very very small so as to allow higher RPM levels safely (upwards of 18,000 rpm these days).
VTEC is worthless when you're talking about a race engine because you can run grinds that are just as crazy as the top grind on the VTEC cam with a normal fixed DOHC setup. The point of VTEC is to be able to run that grind but still maintain better fuel efficiency idle quality and emissions at low RPM.
Now, lets see what horsepower is first, shall we?
Horsepower = Torque * rpm/5252. That's how horsepower is calculated. No if's and's or but's, that's how it is.
So, as you can see, there are two ways to make more power:
1) Make more torque2) Make the same amount of torque at a higher RPM
Displacement does #1. Fiddling with camshafts and such does #2. Now, if you do #1 and #2, you're going to make more power than if you just do one or the other. If F1 engines were 5L, you can be damn sure they'd make a lot more power.
But there are plenty of KAs that are above 200WHP. Lots of Es top that, but only a few DEs that I know of.
Volumetric efficiency- its why those 1.8 civics make more power man.. Also when a motor comes closer to reaching its maximum volumetric efficiency, its typically because the motor is completely built for very high horsepower. When this happens the motors tend to have a lower torque # and also tend to hit their max hp much higher in the rev range at one certain point (vtec in this case). This is why F1 motors are *3.0L v8's*that make around 900 hp and 300 torque. I dont know for sure, but it would be my educated guess that they wouldnt hit any serious hp before 10k rpm.fatboy wrote:
you've heard "theres no replacement for displacement" right? well, its pretty true.
Also, thats way too broad of a question.95hondakillr wrote:I say go race a turbo V8 in a turbo 4 cylinder and let me know who wins
i agree with this man, You can take a V8 that super charged or turbo charge. Any way you want it. Then have 700 hp coming out of that motor. BIG PROBLEM your going to be 35 hundred pounds of junk. Cuz any can create power with a couple of turbos or a with one fatboy. I'd rather be running 500 hp with a WIDE, short *** RX7, and have my weight balance. Vs a solid rear axle bucket, thats only fast in a striaght line. But thats just me. Yeah sure you want weight with all that power. But 24 hundred pounds is fine for me with 295s in the back.DriftingisLame wrote:Also, thats way too broad of a question.
Why do you think a modded cobra (supercharged v8), is not as fast as my friends KA-T? its not all about the displacement, but I already answered that one.. right up there ^^^^^^
that only applies if both motors are near identical. and we are only talking about hp/tq figures and not about handling or blah blah. like a 99 cents bag of cheetos vs a king size. or a regular long neck corona vs a 40oz =). i don't really think the ka was designed as even a sporty motor...fatboy wrote:
you've heard "theres no replacement for displacement" right? well, its pretty true.
cobras have irs. Rotaries are not so light.Mr.Sandman wrote:
i agree with this man, You can take a V8 that super charged or turbo charge. Any way you want it. Then have 700 hp coming out of that motor. BIG PROBLEM your going to be 35 hundred pounds of junk. Cuz any can create power with a couple of turbos or a with one fatboy. I'd rather be running 500 hp with a WIDE, short *** RX7, and have my weight balance. Vs a solid rear axle bucket, thats only fast in a striaght line. But thats just me. Yeah sure you want weight with all that power. But 24 hundred pounds is fine for me with 295s in the back.
plus a 13b is really a 2.6L.... look at all the class for the car they are placed in the same class as a 6 cylinder car... but i still wil get one when my project s13 is done...Mr.Sandman wrote:
i agree with this man, You can take a V8 that super charged or turbo charge. Any way you want it. Then have 700 hp coming out of that motor. BIG PROBLEM your going to be 35 hundred pounds of junk. Cuz any can create power with a couple of turbos or a with one fatboy. I'd rather be running 500 hp with a WIDE, short *** RX7, and have my weight balance. Vs a solid rear axle bucket, thats only fast in a striaght line. But thats just me. Yeah sure you want weight with all that power. But 24 hundred pounds is fine for me with 295s in the back.
it's physically not a 2.6, but when comparing to a 4 stroke engine, it's considered one.USsil80 wrote:plus a 13b is really a 2.6L.... look at all the class for the car they are placed in the same class as a 6 cylinder car... but i still wil get one when my project s13 is done...
Its called power to weight ratio! Any type of forced induction is nothing more than what? Increasing displacement! Think about it.DriftingisLame wrote:
Also, thats way too broad of a question.
Why do you think a modded cobra (supercharged v8), is not as fast as my friends KA-T? its not all about the displacement, but I already answered that one.. right up there ^^^^^^
NO, NO, NOall wrong,.....13b, means 1.3 liter. each rotary has a displacement of 655cc. Now times that by 2 and you get 13ish. Silly.......All of displacement is the same, doesn't matter how many cylinders you use. So, YES, 1.3 liter is keeping up with 3.0 liter supra. Do some research, before you try to tell teach someone. not trying to sound like a jerk, but how can someone learn the truth, if he's being told lies. Also, you can't really compare a rotary engine with a piston engine cuz they both work completely different.COMPLETLYlolUSsil80 wrote:plus a 13b is really a 2.6L.... look at all the class for the car they are placed in the same class as a 6 cylinder car... but i still wil get one when my project s13 is done...
Yeah, i thought about it and that still doesnt make sense. A 2.0L motor with 9:1 compression running 20 psi out of a giant turbo is still a 2.0L motor. And is still most likely much more powerful than a 5.0L all motor with similar compression. The 2L is just much more efficient. I dont even really know what else to say because what you said still doesnt make sense95hondakillr wrote:
Its called power to weight ratio! Any type of forced induction is nothing more than what? Increasing displacement! Think about it.
Okay, excuse me for the angry post, I used to have a '93 RX-7 before my Kouki...Chingon wrote:
cobras have irs. Rotaries are not so light.
200 whp from a n/a ka motor is believable, but very hard to get.refluxd wrote:Anyone Know what the fastest N/A KA24de is running currently and what the specs / money invested is looking like. I talked to a guy here in town that says on his 97 s14 kouki with minor stuff.. weisco pistons, random rods, crank, cams, header, and 2.5 exhaust hes running 200rwhp... any logic / truth in that statement. Let me know if u got any info?? I hear some :: orion :: guy has a fast one.. but I dont have his contact info to speak with him.
short block sans anything maybe. Fully dressed 13brew weights at 430 give or take 10-15 lbs.97ka-t wrote:Okay, excuse me for the angry post, I used to have a '93 RX-7 before my Kouki...
Are you ****ing out of your mind? Rotaries are not so light? Any strong invidual can singlehandedly pick up the block!!! Think about it. 1.3L rotary engine vs 5.7L V8 LS1.. hmmm..