FTFYJesda wrote:Is it an HP?
If the above is a Yes, buy the warranty.
Exactly. It's not a reliability issue with AMD, per-se, it's just that mobile chips have never been AMD's strong suit design-wise, and they run a lot hotter than Intel's lappy chips.Jesda wrote:AMD-powered Lenovos still get pretty hot.
Buy Sonny or Toshiba...No need for warranty with them.Pieceofsand wrote:Basically I'm looking at purchasing a new laptop for around $700, maybe $750 with tax. It comes with a one year warranty. My question is should I get the extended 2 year warranty for additional $80? Or the extended 3 year warranty for $100?
This is going to be my first laptop. I will take very good care of it of course, but that doesn't mean I can promise that nothing will happen to my laptop.
What are your thoughts?
Or that HP has consistently had the highest warranty repair rate out of any manufacturer. By a large margin as well. So by "blows", I think the fact that they are prone to failure was the idea...mike.strong wrote:Who ever says that HP blows is referring to the HP cooling system
Did you ever think that they are the biggest comp manufacturer in the world. So if you have the most comp in the market you will have the most repairs.AppleBonker wrote:Or that HP has consistently had the highest warranty repair rate out of any manufacturer. By a large margin as well. So by "blows", I think the fact that they are prone to failure was the idea...mike.strong wrote:Who ever says that HP blows is referring to the HP cooling system
Also, most I know carry IBM/Lenovo. Could just be that limited dataset I have, but I can't imagine wanting to use an HP as a professional-duty computer (and I do actually own an HP laptop for personal use, thought I only bought it because I got a sweet deal - I wouldn't generally recommend them).mike.strong wrote:Almost every comp professional will use HP elite book or some high end HP.
Lol...You are basing your argument on this web site?AppleBonker wrote:The reliability is calculated based on market share:
http://www.rescuecom.com/RESCUECOM269.html
These work too:mike.strong wrote:Lol...You are basing your argument on this web site?AppleBonker wrote:The reliability is calculated based on market share:
http://www.rescuecom.com/RESCUECOM269.html
Gaming computers tend to be pushed the the extreme a bit more, so I would think they'd be more prone to failure.mike.strong wrote:First of all Asus just entered US market and they do specialize in the Gaming computers aka Republic of Gamers. Just recently they started to produce mid range products.
I fail to see what this has to do with anything. Are you claiming HP is using components that aren't somehow approved?mike.strong wrote:Apple WILL be more reliable than any PC because APPLE uses only Apple designed and approved product.
It's actually the brand in general. And I'm not really trashing them. They've done it to themselves. I'm not sure why your panties are in a bunch, unless you work for HP. I don't really care what people buy. I just warn them and try to give them facts before making their decision.mike.strong wrote:But if you really want to trash HP please provide me with the model.
common misconception, your top end PC is now better at handling media editing than your top end mac, and you'll pay less for the PC.downedzephyr wrote: Although I will say that apple computers are nice for things like photoshop, movie editing, and music production. I'd still take a PC over an apple any day though.
RobPaulson wrote:common misconception, your top end PC is now better at handling media editing than your top end mac, and you'll pay less for the PC.
now-a-days, only read to buy a mac is cause they are user friendly and you basically can't break them accidentally. So for the people that don't care to put the time in to learn how to handle a PC to be virus free and in top performance, I just tell them to buy a mac.
EDIT: PS, above post isnt tryin to troll you downedzephyr, i just hear this a lot, and while macs do make media editing easier, PC's are still 'better' at their greatest userknowledge/hardware potential.
downedzephyr wrote: true, but if you're in the industry for media editing macs are pretty much the standard now. I wasn't contesting that PCs have greater potential, but merely commenting on how apples are indeed very user friendly, especially for those who are not too computer savvy. That being said, I do all of my media editing on my PC using the typical Adobe software
AppleBonker wrote:It's actually the brand in general. And I'm not really trashing them. They've done it to themselves. I'm not sure why your panties are in a bunch, unless you work for HP. I don't really care what people buy. I just warn them and try to give them facts before making their decision.
But I've had limited positive experience with HP. Most people I know with HP machines feel the same. And I've had really nothing but positive experience with Asus.
Ok buddy.Jesda wrote:Mike, it appears you want us to accept your argument based on a web site.
You also sound like a virgin.
The average consumer is a retard. Especially when it comes to computers. Because your grandmother thinks her HP is the bees knees doesn't make it so.mike.strong wrote:I am just simply proving that HP has the biggest share of the PC market as today.
