EPA accuses Volkswagen, Audi of evading emission laws

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
darylzero
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 am
Car: Nissan Rogue 2009 SL AWD Premium Pkg.

Post

This is very bad. Those SOB's at VW and Audi made it so that emission controls would only work if the cars emission system was being tested.
"This results in cars that meet emissions standards in the laboratory or testing station, but during normal operation, emit nitrogen oxides at up to 40 times the standard."
http://money.cnn.com/2015/09/18/autos/e ... tml?iid=EL

VW could face $18 Billion in fines from the EPA!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/09/ ... VK20150918


User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

To be perfectly honest:

HIGH FIVE VOLKSWAGEN, AG!!!!!

The EPA/CARB legislation in question is all s*** anyway. Arbitrary nonsense, even if you do believe in its purpose. Maybe a huge corporation cheating on your legislation is a strong sign that it's fatally broken. But, of course, nobody on the EPA side will ever have enough clarity to see it that way. I wish MORE automakers would do this. Swallow the fines and break the rules. Laws that can't be enforced carry no authority, so I'd love to see this spread. Imagine if every automaker selling in the U.S. gave the EPA the middle finger and just did what they wanted? Sure, slap fines on everyone, see what happens. It's a trap.

I've never been a big (modern) VW fan, but I love the Hell out of this. It makes me so happy.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

Just like everything the govt. does, I suspect there is something else about this we're not being told yet.

As for applauding the company, I would have to say definitely NO. If any of it is true at face value, as the EPA says it (doubtful), then that just makes VW sound more like the janky auto company I have always viewed them as anyway. If even only part is true, I still have my reservations about the company.

User avatar
darylzero
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 am
Car: Nissan Rogue 2009 SL AWD Premium Pkg.

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:To be perfectly honest:

HIGH FIVE VOLKSWAGEN, AG!!!!!

The EPA/CARB legislation in question is all bullsh*t anyway. Arbitrary nonsense, even if you do believe in its purpose. Maybe a huge corporation cheating on your legislation is a strong sign that it's fatally broken. But, of course, nobody on the EPA side will ever have enough clarity to see it that way. I wish MORE automakers would do this. Swallow the fines and break the rules. Laws that can't be enforced carry no authority, so I'd love to see this spread. Imagine if every automaker selling in the U.S. gave the EPA the middle finger and just did what they wanted? Sure, slap fines on everyone, see what happens. It's a trap.

I've never been a big (modern) VW fan, but I love the Hell out of this. It makes me so happy.
Wait, so you like the idea that VW is polluting the air?

If this story is true then California may never let VW's back in their state lol

User avatar
darylzero
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 am
Car: Nissan Rogue 2009 SL AWD Premium Pkg.

Post

Volkswagen shares drop 20% this morning.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2015/09/2 ... JX20150921

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

I have mixed feelings about this topic. I used to be a big VW fan, back when they made simple, well made, fun to drive, easily fixable cars. The technological terrors they sell now, designed to hold you hostage to the dealer, has made it more difficult to like them as much, and that's without the recent news. I enjoyed MoD's rant and I do agree with him to a point like the tougher emission laws being silly which make diesel cars even more needlessly complex and stupidly expensive to repair. And VW's cheating is not as heinous as what GM did with their even more despicable behavior with the ignition switch scandal. But I do take issue with VW because of the hypocrisy and cheating. the regulations maybe stupid, but they're still regulations. VW spent a lotta effort promoting how clean their diesels were, meeting all regulations without sacrificing power or economy or requiring DEF (diesel exhaust fluid), which the other diesel vehicle manufacturers have had to use to comply. Yet it turned out to be a complete lie, and instead, they used a clever, inexpensive (by comparison) bypass trick to fool gov't testing and hide their lack of actual development. Face it, if they couldn't make those diesel engines comply, they should never have sold the dang things with those motors. Very simple. To me, what VW allegedly did was both unethical and unfair to all the other legitimate diesel vehicle manufacturers who invested millions trying to comply with those tougher standards. I feel no sympathy for VW's leadership, who I think should consider resigning, as well as the chief engineer who gave the green light to cheat. An 18 billion dollar fine seems rather excessive given the nature of the infraction, but at the very least I think VW needs to pay some significant fine. FWIW GM's fine for the ignition scandal was just $900mill and it involved fatalities. Obviously VW must stop selling those non-complying diesels, which should hopefully make them think twice about cheating again. And part of the fine should perhaps involve paying something to the impacted car owners as the resale value of their cars just took a major dump thru no fault of their own. As far as what to do with the crop dusting, ozone depleting, insect killing, non-complying diesel Veedubs on the road? I think nothing should be done. They're not dangerous. They simply pollute more than the newest regulations permit, and ironically, might still pollute less than older diesels on the road now. I'd personally let them simply stay with their owners and not force VW to do a massive recall which I think would do little more than be a major inconvenience to the car owners who had the poor luck of unwittingly buying them. Besides, any fix VW does to improve emissions would result in the owners seeing less power and worse gas mileage in their cars. Some fix. Why would any VW owner want to do that?

User avatar
nchopp
Posts: 6938
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 5:17 am

Post

This is going to be huge, me thinks. VW may be well and truly hosed. This isn't an "oops", this is a "we set out to deceive and violate laws and got caught".

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

darylzero wrote:Wait, so you like the idea that VW is polluting the air?
I can't say I take particular issue with it. It's not like that's a new problem or one unique to VW. It take FAR more issue with the fact that the laws they broke existed in the first place.
darylzero wrote:If this story is true then California may never let VW's back in their state lol
The fact that that's how it works is sort of the core of my viewpoint. A messed-up, power-hungry, legislation-crazy state of greenies has an opinion and that means an entire industry gets changed? To Hell with that. California can take a hike. There's more to the universe than California and their (generally broken and fearmongering) opinions. If I were an automaker I'd quite happily give Cali the middle finger and sell everywhere else on earth instead. Yes, their population is huge and, yes, there are tons of sales there. There are also plenty of other markets to sell in.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Appears the first step is done. V-dub's CEO of the last 8 years, which I believe is about how long they've been cheating on diesel testing, just announced he's resigning. Next up, the avalanche of civil lawsuits by angry US VW diesel owners seeking vengeance...er...money.

User avatar
RicerX
Moderator
Posts: 2703
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:36 am
Car: '20 Titan Pro4X
Location: Southeastern US

Post

I'm not convinced there aren't other automakers doing this, anyway. They just got caught with their pants down.

It was also somewhat obvious that there was something at play when their diesels didn't require a urea-injection system while every single other "clean diesel" on the market had to have one.

I'm paying close attention, because I feel this whole situation is justice for the horrendous VW ownership experience I had with my damn Jetta. I have so much PTSD related to a check engine light illumination it's silly.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

I'm sure other auto companies are cheating, as there are plenty of examples of cheating it in other areas. The key is getting caught. With all the lawsuits getting filed since the news broke, it wouldn't surprise me if VW implements a US diesel car buyback program.

User avatar
frapjap
Posts: 13175
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 2:46 pm
Car: '99 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am
'07 Subaru Legacy
Location: South Coast Massachusetts

Post

Didn't they kinda steal from our gov't, too? I thought I remembered reading something about 51 million in subsidies for the clean diesel tech.

Most folks don't get lucky when caught stealing from the government.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

Image

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Image

User avatar
darylzero
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 am
Car: Nissan Rogue 2009 SL AWD Premium Pkg.

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote:The fact that that's how it works is sort of the core of my viewpoint. A messed-up, power-hungry, legislation-crazy state of greenies has an opinion and that means an entire industry gets changed? To Hell with that. California can take a hike. There's more to the universe than California and their (generally broken and fearmongering) opinions. If I were an automaker I'd quite happily give Cali the middle finger and sell everywhere else on earth instead. Yes, their population is huge and, yes, there are tons of sales there. There are also plenty of other markets to sell in.
I agree Cali is messed up with a lot it it's laws. With the emissions though, I think California is correct. I don't live there, but I have been there and the smog can get insane from all the cars.

I live in a big city and air quality is a concern. The EPA may overreach on a lot of things but exhaust emissions is important. You don't want to be breathing air like in China.

Granted China's air quality has a lot to do with factories, but my point is still valid.
Image

User avatar
darylzero
Posts: 1267
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 5:28 am
Car: Nissan Rogue 2009 SL AWD Premium Pkg.

Post

OriginalWheelman wrote:Image
:rotfl

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

I don't see what's wrong with it....customers want a diesel that has good performance and better gas mileage.

Therefore, in order to meet those demands, while keeping costs low, they developed a system which somewhat "cheated" the tests.

Most customers would prefer better gas mileage over emissions anyways.

Would you rather pay MORE for LESS power and WORSE fuel economy?
Probably not.

With more power and better fuel economy, their customers can save more.

Now that's how you pass on the savings down to your customers.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19000
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

nchopp wrote:This is going to be huge, me thinks. VW may be well and truly hosed. This isn't an "oops", this is a "we set out to deceive and violate laws and got caught".
Exactly. Yes, GM's fines were big for the ignition switch thing, but the frequency was low, and the fix/recall was cheap and easy.
The fact that these were being sold as "clean diesels" with certain power and MPG ratings is what is going to get them. When you bought that car, you bought that package. If they "fix" it, not only will the fix be expensive, it will most likely impact MPG and/or power (or cost of ownership).
California is f*** crazy enough to say "fair enough. NO MORE VWs on our roads until they fix the issue", at which point the consumer will be extremely pissed. VW would either have to buy the car back, fix it (which they aren't tooled up to do instantly), or supply another vehicle to the consumer while they figure it all out.
I could see a lot of cheap VW diesels coming here, where we don't test for emissions.

And yes, this is huge. This is big enough to put a MAJOR dent (or even bankrupt) VW. Its so f*** big, that it actually affected the stock price of my company, and for that I am pissed. f*** you, VW.
Take your check engine lights, and get the hell out of here.

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

asoomal wrote:I don't see what's wrong with it....customers want a diesel that has good performance and better gas mileage.

Therefore, in order to meet those demands, while keeping costs low, they developed a system which somewhat "cheated" the tests.

Most customers would prefer better gas mileage over emissions anyways.

Would you rather pay MORE for LESS power and WORSE fuel economy?
Probably not.

With more power and better fuel economy, their customers can save more.

Now that's how you pass on the savings down to your customers.
Agree that from the consumer's view, better gas mileage and performance are much more important than meeting emission requirements. But auto manufacturers are still required to meet those new emission requirements or they're not allowed to sell those cars in the US. Plain and simple. And we're not talking a minor cheat here, VW NOx emissions were up to 40 times over the required allowance. That's pretty big. If it turns out that VW's upcoming fix to the problem will significantly reduce power and economy (20% is estimated), I'm sure there will be plenty of owners that will no longer want their rolling coal cars if that's the case, and since resale values are expected to plummet, a buyback offer program seems logical, at least as one option. That could eliminate many of the upcoming civil lawsuits. As far as owners refusing to get the recall done, if it happens, I can imagine states with stricter emission laws, like California, could easily force you deal with it by refuse to allow residents to renew registration on their diesel-Dubs unless proven it was fixed. That means not complying could make your diesel Veedub an instant lawn ornament when the registration expires or you sell it to someone in a state that will let them register it..

I'm confident VW will survive this mess, as they not only have deep pockets, their US diesel sales are not that huge a percentage of their overall US sales. Their reputation is going to take a major hit for sure, but doing dumb things is not limited to VW. GM, Ford, for example, have done even larger scale dumb things. For example, GM's ignition switch scandal, Ford's trying to coverup the exploding Pinto's and rollover prone Exploders. In all 3 cases, the dumb things involved fatalities. Despite massive recalls, big fines, and lawsuits, the companies survived.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Image

User avatar
Jesda
Posts: 39644
Joined: Mon May 05, 2003 1:50 pm
Location: STL, DTW
Contact:

Post

With the ignition switch, GM fixed the part and quietly reused the part number without telling anyone.

With VW, they purposely committed an act of fraud from the very beginning.

This confirms everything Bob Lutz said about his years in the European auto industry, that while Americans aren't completely above board, Europeans are brash and bold about kickbacks, bribes, theft, and scams. There isn't even the decorative appearance of honesty at firms like VW, BMW, and MB.

User avatar
szh
Posts: 15932
Joined: Tue Jul 23, 2002 12:54 pm
Car: 2018 Tesla Model 3.

Unfortunately, no longer a Nissan or Infiniti, but continuing here at NICO!
Location: San Jose, CA

Post

I wonder about BMW and their Diesel cars ... could they also have similar issues?

Z

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

they could, but until they actually get caught, it can be assumed they comply.

User avatar
txchamps
Posts: 288
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:14 am
Car: 2015 Versa Note SV, 2023 Kia Rio S
Location: Texas (Go Spurs!)

Post

Jesda wrote:With the ignition switch, GM fixed the part and quietly reused the part number without telling anyone.

With VW, they purposely committed an act of fraud from the very beginning.
Exactly what I was going to point out. You beat me to it, Jesda.

I also wish to say that anybody who applauds VW for this blatant act of fraud needs to revisit the concept of integrity.

AND, those who defend VW by speculating that the other diesel car manufacturers probably have done this but just haven't gotten caught are missing the point entirely, while engaging in wild conjecture that has no basis.

VW did something really BAD, people, and there are millions of victims.

Buzzman
Posts: 2079
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:35 pm
Car: 2016 Lexus RX 350
2023 Kia Stinger Elite V6 AWD.

Post

[quote="txchamps
VW did something really BAD, people, and there are millions of victims.[/quote]

Maybe just a little extreme there.
They got caught cheating the system, sure, but it's not like every diesel VW out there is suddenly going to explode on the highway.
You can still drive them, and they still work.
At the end of the day, I'm sure they'll come up with some sort of monetary compensation plan, as well as a software fix.
Ultimately, that's what most owners will want: money.
People will not die or lose their life savings. It's just a car.

As for the Company, they'll pay big time for this. They'll suffer a much worse fate than any diesel owner, as well they should.
It will cost them billions, not to mention oodles of lost business and of course, a shattered reputation.
This also might be a good time to visit a dealership and get a deal on a new (non diesel) car. They'll be desperate.

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

I could make farting illegal and create countless "blatant acts of fraud."
And you can't tell me you've NEVER even slightly exceeded the speed limit deliberately. You lying, dishonest, integrity-lacking scumbag. Oh, wait, no. You just did something "illegal" that you don't find particularly significant, and it has no bearing on your character. Hi, meet my acquaintance VW; I think the two of you might have something in common.

The reality here is so much more complicated than "VW lied."

Why did they consider taking such a monumental risk?
Why did they decide to actually go through with it?
They felt it was worth it.
Does that say more about VW, or about the rules they were breaking? That's not a rhetorical question. It has one answer, and it's not the one everyone is giving.

CUSTOMERS (the ones everyone is making out to be the victim here) never asked VW to promise any specific emissions standards. National governments and governing bodies did. NOBODY was harmed. If this law never existed, nobody would have known anything was "wrong." Because it's all invented. It's all arbitrary. Where did the numbers come from? Can you even tell me?

It's not dishonest to break a law that only has imagined purpose. It's like passing a law saying you can't fart because the smell is offensive, and then claiming that everyone who farts is harming countless others. The harm is imagined. We have been polluting this planet for centuries. VW is not the first, not the last, and not the only party to try to circumvent laws regulating it. Creating laws about it without properly considering the broad repercussions (or, in the first place, NEED) is more criminal than quietly bypassing a test nobody actually cares about except the people who invented it. We don't all have cancer. The apocalypse hasn't happened. We're going to be fine, and everyone needs to take a dose of reality check pills stat. I actually read an article using math from who-the-Hell-knows-where to claim that VW is responsible for "hundreds" of deaths due to increased polution, and that those responsible should be jailed for murder. My head. EXPLODE. WHAT DID WE DO BEFORE THESE LAWS? Did we just all drop dead and the whole world cease to spin? How are we all still here talking to each-other?! Is this all just happening in my head? If so, why does my head suck so spectacularly?!

This whole thing is so asinine it's unbelievable.

This is one more example of exactly why modern human society needs a serious rethink of its priorities. It's just NOT IMPORTANT. It does not matter. Nobody should care. But everyone is offended and angry and hurt. Instead of creating unnecessary laws to make harmless things criminal and then get pissy about it, we could be devoting all this effort to things that actually matter. But we're not. Wonderful.

Ou8roger2
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 10:55 pm

Post

Hello, I've joined your site because I had to post about this very interesting topic. These VW apologists make my eyes roll. It is indefensible to stick up for a company like VW who thinks their customers are too stupid to know or care about emissions, this company colluded from within to deliberately LIE and thumb their noses altogether at customers AND gov't regulators to make a profit, if that isn't dishonest then I'm the queen of England. What they did is beyond despicable and they deserve to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That stuff may fly in Europe but it's NOT OK here in the United States, and we have to make that CRYSTAL CLEAR to the big boys in Europe, we have to make an example of VW so the other car manufactures don't even think about trying to be cute in the future.

User avatar
PapaSmurf2k3
Site Admin
Posts: 19000
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 3:20 pm
Car: 2017 Corvette, 2018 Focus ST, 1993 240sx truck KA Turbo.
Location: Merrimack, NH

Post

MinisterofDOOM wrote: CUSTOMERS (the ones everyone is making out to be the victim here) never asked VW to promise any specific emissions standards.
VW touted "clean diesel", put stickers on cars that said such, and sold cars to VW owners (who are mostly hipsters that actually care about the environment) that were obviously supposed to be in compliance with emissions regulations at the time of sale. So no, they didn't directly ask VW to promise they meet emissions standards, because it is implied.
How pissed would you be if you went out and bought a new car, and it failed an emissions test the very first time it was tested. Then the state gave you a 30 day "fix it" window before being tested again. If it didn't pass, you weren't allowed to register it.
Now, at this point, you'd expect the car company to make it right by any means necessary. Replace your cat, bring the car in, check everything out, pay for your re-test, etc. But that's still a whole load of s*** that you shouldn't have had to deal with in the first place.

I realize your beef is more with the EPA and their standards, but the fact remains that VW lied to their customers and the EPA about the product that they were building, and selling at a premium.

User avatar
OriginalWheelman
Posts: 5668
Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 am
Car: '15 Ford Focus Electric
Location: Portland, OR (or what?)

Post

Ou8roger2 wrote:Hello, I've joined your site because I had to post about this very interesting topic. These VW apologists make my eyes roll. It is indefensible to stick up for a company like VW who thinks their customers are too stupid to know or care about emissions, this company colluded from within to deliberately LIE and thumb their noses altogether at customers AND gov't regulators to make a profit, if that isn't dishonest then I'm the queen of England. What they did is beyond despicable and they deserve to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That stuff may fly in Europe but it's NOT OK here in the United States, and we have to make that CRYSTAL CLEAR to the big boys in Europe, we have to make an example of VW so the other car manufactures don't even think about trying to be cute in the future.
Image

User avatar
Bubba1
Moderator
Posts: 16082
Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2002 1:42 pm
Car: 2003 Nissan 350z
2024 Honda HR-V
2008 Toyota Corolla S
2001 Toyota Avalon XLS

Post

PapaSmurf2k3 wrote: I realize your beef is more with the EPA and their standards, but the fact remains that VW lied to their customers and the EPA about the product that they were building, and selling at a premium.
:yesnod From what I've read, VW said they want to recall all 11 million cars. the problem is I don't think they have a fix that'll maintain their fuel mileage or power ratings. I still think Veedub'll end up buying back many of the half million US cars because if the fix results in lower mileage/power, VW will still risk lawsuits by disgruntled owners. Buying them back eliminates the lawsuits and makes it a one time charge... well unless they make insultingly low offers to buy them back.


Return to “General Chat”