Post by
oldmako »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/oldmako-u82911.html
Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:43 am
Getting caught with a detector would amount to a small fine and would virtually guarantee a speeding ticket as opposed to a warning. Getting caught transmitting with a jammer, would be a much more serious offense. No chance I'd try that.
I routinely drive 75-80 on the interstates and have bumbled through several speed traps (cop in median with gun up) without getting a ticket. My last ticket was for 82mph in 2000 and I average 18-2000 miles per month on the highway.
I think that the volume of traffic has as much to do with it as the speed. If the flow is heavy and fast they don't seem to come after you. Late at night when flow is light, they seem to let you go as there is always some gang banger from NY or NJ doing 90plus. The trick is to let those guys get a half a mile or so out in front and then match their speed. I once went through a speed trap with a corvette and the cop pulled him over not me, even though our speeds were identical. The Q is a sleeper in that regard.
I am intrigued by the valentine because I know two guys who swear by them. Both are gear heads with fast cars who know a bit about technology and like to haul ***. The units aren't cheap, but then again if one can avoid an expensive incident (court costs, atty if really fast, time off work for court, insurance premium increase, etc etc) then the price of a detector seems benign. Or, I could just slow down to 70....but that's not in my nature.When on an interstate, in good conditions (dry surface, little to no traffic, excellent visibility, etc) and in a well maintained Q, (or BMW, MB, Lex, Caddy etc etc etc) driving 65 is an insulting, arbitrary and capricious sack of stool.
The rush of hauling *** in one of these things is the reason I bought it and why I go to significant and expensive lengths to maintain it. I do not wish to buzz down the highway in a tin can.