I saw this thread a while back, and simply did not know enough about the likely outcome to post in it.HashiriyaS14 wrote:So Bud and I are the only two people on the NICO politics forum interested and dedicated enough to formulate our own original electoral predictions for this tremendously important Presidential Election?
Figures I guess, we're the only two Redskins fans. We're a higher quality breed, lol.
Alright, fair enough. I was thinking of doing this anyway once I noticed the paucity of people willing to fill out intact lists. I had only done that because of the "look at me I was right" factor that could be enjoyed later by those who make accurate predictions.Jesda wrote:This thread is silly and restrictive. Why in the world would I go to the trouble of typing out every state with electoral votes, especially without the option to discuss?
We should talk about which states are up for grabs, which states are being heavily spent on and visited, and which previously predictable states are now in play.
As for the Redskins, I don't even know what sport that is.
The only problem with all of that is that group of people is usually very well represented in the polls and, while they may not run bumper stickers, is very rarely a "surprise turnout" group. If they're going to turn out, you probably already know the extent in advance and thus the even-steven status of the VA race already reflects it.AZhitman wrote:I think the VA vote will surprise you...
I envision the "silent majority" waking up on "The Day", hopping in their pickup trucks with their lunch pail and coffee thermos, stopping by the polling place, wordlessly dropping their vote for the JM/SP ticket, and heading off to work...
No "I Voted" sticker, no discussion on the Intarwebz, no media-influenced hoopla and outrage.
Just simple hard-working American men and women (the ones who "cling to guns and religion") making their voice heard - On the only occasion that really matters.
Oh, statewide, absolutely. Depending on the poll it seems anywhere from dead-even to McCain +8. I think it's actually something like McCain +3 or 4.AZhitman wrote:Time seems to disagree on VA, with McCain holding a 6% lead over BO in that state:
http://www.time.com/time/polit...n=yes
LOL96Qowner wrote:You can put Minnesota in McCain's column. Sarah Palin is one of them. No way they're gonna go for Obama anymore, especially with Franken in the race. Coleman's ads are destroying him.
Jesda wrote:Two parties chock full of suck.
They're too busy rambling outside the voting stations and forget to go in...AZhitman wrote:Then they all slept in, or did whatever it is that Lefties do when it's time to be someplace important.
The attacks from Palin/McCain against Obama appear to be working against them.HashiriyaS14 wrote:WOW.
This was a nasty day of polling for John McCain, I don't know what to attribute it to, so I won't guess.
Anyway, I'll start with the more shocking polls:
FL: Obama +7 (Rasmussen)MO: Obama +3 (Rasmussen)NC: Obama +6 (PPP)NH: Obama +13 (SurveyUSA)PA: Obama +10 (Morning Call)NATIONAL: Obama +8 (Rasmussen)
Firstly, Rasmussen polling is reliable and respected but tends to skew ever-so-slightly conservative, so the above numbers in Florida and especially FRICKIN MISSOURI are a little nuts. Additionally, New Hampshire is one of the states McCain still wants to seriously contest, and even if the lead is still only 8-10, that's still a pretty serious lead for NoDrama.
Rasmussen has Obama +2 in VA, while Suffolk and SurveyUSA both have him in the double-digits. Even if we put it at +4 or +6 in reality (i.e. not totally split the difference), that's still a decent lead in a once-solid red state.
The only bright spot is a Rasmussen +1 in Ohio for McCain, although this is somewhat offset by an ABC poll that has Obama +6 there, so I'd assume a narrow Obama lead or a tie.
But, yeah, wow. Missouri? +6 in NORTH CAROLINA? Wow.
Yeah, I think that might be at least part of it.telcoman wrote:The attacks from Palin/McCain against Obama appear to be working against them.