Just to be clear, I was fully in agreement with you... Not sure if that was understood.Marenta wrote:
If I remember reading Yahoo correctly, Private Bennett raped an Austrian little girl. No offense but I would not have a problem pulling the lever on the gallows in his case.budrn79870 wrote:So tell me Greg, do you think this is a fair use of Capital punishment?
On April 13, 1961, U.S. Army Private John A. Bennett was hanged after being convicted of rape and attempted murder. (R. Serrano, "Last Soldier to Die at Levenworth Hanged in an April Storm," Los Angeles Times, 7/12/94).
You're advocating that someone as "dumb" as you make him out to be, go and effectively reverse the determinations of the Judicial Branch?AZhitman wrote:
How is a one time event "prolific"?
And if you're gonna prattle on about nonmilitary TX inmates' sentences not being commuted, I'd ask again:
For someone who paints the prez as "an idiot", how could he profess to know better than all the esteemed professionals in the Judicial Branch preceding him?
I thought the majority of the ship was non smoking. With certain bays designated as "smoking." I guess most of the GW was smoking that day, eh? Will be interesting to see if the GW gets dubbed a new name, like the ForestFire, Pigway, the ****yKitty and the Numbnutz.Marenta wrote:Don't get me wrong, the frown was not for any disagreement or apparent lack of coming to terms. It was for me trying to decide on how much I should disclose.
I know the entire story. I know who started it, where, the exact inlet plenum and vent filter that started the fire. Hell, I even know what type of fire causing agent was used to ignite it. So, the depth of my knowledge was the issue, not the fact that I thought you and I had been of non-concurrence.
Gotcha.Marenta wrote:Don't get me wrong, the frown was not for any disagreement or apparent lack of coming to terms. It was for me trying to decide on how much I should disclose.
I know the entire story. I know who started it, where, the exact inlet plenum and vent filter that started the fire. Hell, I even know what type of fire causing agent was used to ignite it. So, the depth of my knowledge was the issue, not the fact that I thought you and I had been of non-concurrence.
Yes, an 11 year old girl. Certainly he deserved to be locked up for the rest of his life, but to be executed for a non-fatal criminal act? Barbaric.Cold_Zero wrote:If I remember reading Yahoo correctly, Private Bennett raped an Austrian little girl. No offense but I would not have a problem pulling the lever on the gallows in his case.bud
Far right (or the picture's left). Name on uniform.Marenta wrote:LOL
I guess you'll never know which one is me.. >:F
Yes.rn79870 wrote:Did you know that it was a capital offense to...commit an offense with the intent to avoid hazardous duty or knowingly endangering a mission That is reasonable? That citation says "offense" not murder, not manslaughter, nor rape.
He left his post, was drunk and RAPED A LITTLE GIRL! Who is the barbaric one? That soldier took the innocence of a little girl. I have no problem with his execution. You dont have to commit a non fatal criminal act to get the death penalty.rn79870 wrote:
Yes, an 11 year old girl. Certainly he deserved to be locked up for the rest of his life, but to be executed for a non-fatal criminal act? Barbaric.
Oh! Wrong!AZhitman wrote:
Far right (or the picture's left). Name on uniform.
If I were his watch commander, he wouldn't have been alive past quaters the next morning. And, I'd be the one sitting on Death Row waiting for the President to give the order for the kill. I'd take it with a smile because I knew I did the right thing.Cold_Zero wrote:
He left his post, was drunk and RAPED A LITTLE GIRL! Who is the barbaric one? That soldier took the innocence of a little girl. I have no problem with his execution. You dont have to commit a non fatal criminal act to get the death penalty.
He would have at least had a run in with the "locker monster" before being sent to jail.Marenta wrote:
If I were his watch commander, he wouldn't have been alive past quaters the next morning. And, I'd be the one sitting on Death Row waiting for the President to give the order for the kill. I'd take it with a smile because I knew I did the right thing.
THAT is Divine Justice.
I suppose having the upbringing that I've had, I'm pretty cold-hearted. The only people I warm up to is Eric and Will, (Army man and my son) other than that I'm fairly distant, and tend to be rather blunt.Cold_Zero wrote:
He would have at least had a run in with the "locker monster" as we call it.
Big difference when it's not YOUR little girl you raised and loved and read stories to and protected and cared for....Cold_Zero wrote:
He left his post, was drunk and RAPED A LITTLE GIRL! Who is the barbaric one? That soldier took the innocence of a little girl. I have no problem with his execution. You dont have to commit a non fatal criminal act to get the death penalty.
Problematic? Yes. Relevant to the OP? Not in the least.rn79870 wrote:According to Dwight Sullivan "While the number of servicemembers under death sentence is fairly small, the racial disparity in military death penalty cases has been distressingly persistent. During World War II, African-Americans accounted for less than 10 percent of the Army. Yet, of the 70 soldiers executed in Europe during the war, 55 [79%] were African-American. After President Truman ordered an end to the armed forces' segregation in 1948, this racial disparity actually increased. The military carried out 12 executions from 1954 until the most recent one in 1961. Eleven of the 12 executed servicemembers were African-American."
Certainly is big guy. Think on it Ricky... The military should not be allowed to dispense life or death justice (except perhaps, in the time of war). Giving the military this live or die right, and allowing GW to to have any part in the process is pathetic. My gawd, a traditional jury trial is that much of a threat?AZHitman wrote:Problematic? Yes. Relevant to the OP? Not in the least.