lol when i thought it couldn't get any betterspooled240 wrote:
i made a rap out of your quote im boredAZhitman wrote:Grant, you haven't paid much attention.Most modded S13 'vert in existenceAdapted disc brakes to old Datsunsmusclecar restorationston of projects I had a hand in20-30 hours? spent more than that on intercooler pipin'You don't want to compare garages, son. You'll get props for your drops, but that's where it end.
.
wikiwikiwikiwiki!pj wrote:
i made a rap out of your quote im bored
yokota180sx wrote:i think your car looks dumband i think you suck at pictures and burnouts. but whatever
i wonder how/if yokota is gonna make a comebackAZhitman wrote:Grant, you haven't paid much attention.Most modded S13 'vert in existence... S/C my G Coupe... restoring 4 classic Dattos... Adapted disc brakes to old Datsuns... Two boosted cars, a couple old musclecar restorations, a World of Wheels contender, resto of a 49 Olds, and tons of other projects I just had a hand in (but weren't mine).20-30 hours? LOL - I spent more than that just on intercooler piping. You don't want to compare garages, son. You'll get props for your drops, but that's where it ends.
I'm not even done editing them, and none are uploaded to a public host. We'll post them up when we have decided what to go with. It will be its own thread.S13_love wrote: Any pics of this poster you speak of?
mattblancarte wrote:
Just for hating on random photography, I'm going to have to point out that you have a WP.com hosted blog and domain.
blog n00b.
I kid, I kid.
dude, if i kept a car for more than 6 months it might matter. Fact is, im doing more in 6 months to EVERY car i own, than most people in 3 years....AZhitman wrote:No need.
Grant's good at what he does, and he knows wheel fitment better than most anyone I know.
But to disrespect the effort and ingenuity that went into a car that took hundreds of hours to build is simply retarded.
spooled240 wrote:^how would you have built it? i am curious
^ I couldn't find any other emoticon thing other than that to express what I felt after reading your post. Let alone this part by itself.yokota180sx wrote:Its too pretty with all that power.
Why is this bad?yokota180sx wrote: its like having a 900HP supra with a stock body
Never thought you were a track guy. Do tell.yokota180sx wrote:...and the b**** woudl be on the track, constantly.
When I started building this car I had 2 T56 transmissions. Both were low mileage rebuilds that were supposed to be in good working order. The one that was in the car when I had the LS1 in it had a cracked 3rd gear synchro so when you tried to shift into 3rd at WOT it would grind. So I took a gamble and tried the other behind the L92 motor. It is in worse shape than the first trans. It has serious issues getting into reverse and sometimes locks out various gears at various different times. It wasn't too bad at first but the more I thrash on it the worse it is getting. The car has spent most of its life with me sideways with lots of tire smoke coming out the rear so that doesn't help matters. I pretty much knew that no stock T56 would live behind the motor I built but under time constraints I decided to just run it until it broke. I will take it out this winter and do a rebuild on it myself and beef it up to handle the power. Stock T56 trans are known to break with stock LS1 power. They don't handle bigger horsepower very well. It would survive longer in the S chassis though because of the lighter weight. If you build them though they can handle upwards of 1000hp with Viper internals.White Comet wrote:whats wrong with the trans? just wear and tear? is it a t56?
Greg,I'm not quite finished with it yet. There are still a few things I want to get done before I could sell it. Plus I am still having lots of fun with it. I was tempted to trade you but buying the supercharged VQ would be a waste for me. I would just slap a LS in there LOL. You will be the first to know when she officially goes up for sell.AZhitman wrote:Just meet me in San Antonio with the title.
thats some bad luck and i didnt know about using viper internals. my brother got burned on his first t56 too, the guy said it was rebuilt but they effed something up in it. he found a place that sells remanned ones and offers a 12 month warranty. and for his hp a stock t56 is fineC3Sierra_S2000 wrote:
When I started building this car I had 2 T56 transmissions. Both were low mileage rebuilds that were supposed to be in good working order. The one that was in the car when I had the LS1 in it had a cracked 3rd gear synchro so when you tried to shift into 3rd at WOT it would grind. So I took a gamble and tried the other behind the L92 motor. It is in worse shape than the first trans. It has serious issues getting into reverse and sometimes locks out various gears at various different times. It wasn't too bad at first but the more I thrash on it the worse it is getting. The car has spent most of its life with me sideways with lots of tire smoke coming out the rear so that doesn't help matters. I pretty much knew that no stock T56 would live behind the motor I built but under time constraints I decided to just run it until it broke. I will take it out this winter and do a rebuild on it myself and beef it up to handle the power. Stock T56 trans are known to break with stock LS1 power. They don't handle bigger horsepower very well. It would survive longer in the S chassis though because of the lighter weight. If you build them though they can handle upwards of 1000hp with Viper internals.
stock ka? with whacked suspension geometry and bump-steer? sounds like a form > function drift slut rather than a full-time track caryokota180sx wrote:9.5s all around with starspecs, aragosta coils, almost on the ground, URAS GT kit, and the b**** woudl be on the track, constantly. Its too pretty with all that power. its like having a 900HP supra with a stock body. just means your a dyno queen
i thought you meant in addition to his stuff?Im a BIG fan of the v8. just wish there was more to itspooled240 wrote:
stock ka? with whacked suspension geometry and bump-steer? sounds like a form > function drift slut rather than a full-time track car
I personally wouldn't waste my money on a t56... even the viper spec has been known to snap things in cobras at the strip.White Comet wrote:thats some bad luck and i didnt know about using viper internals. my brother got burned on his first t56 too, the guy said it was rebuilt but they effed something up in it. he found a place that sells remanned ones and offers a 12 month warranty. and for his hp a stock t56 is fine
cant wait until i can honestly say that to almost everyone that looks at a picture of my car and has a sandy vag about it. This is sig material.C3Sierra_S2000 wrote: To those that like it, thanks. To those that don't, no worries, it's fast enough that you don't have to look at it long.
makes sense. my brother thought about the tko as well but he's not making enough power to kill the t56 and since it's 6 spd he can cruise on the hwy at just over idlekillernoodle wrote:
I personally wouldn't waste my money on a t56... even the viper spec has been known to snap things in cobras at the strip.
The TKO is where its at, even at 5 speeds. I hear the 6060 is quite an improvement as well.