A oil rig named the Deepwater Horizon had a underwater blowout and sank. Now thousands of gallons of crude oil is leaking into the Gulf of Mexico daily
you do realize this has been all over the news for 2 weeks right?hatedinthemind wrote:Has anybody else heard about this?
A oil rig named the Deepwater Horizon had a underwater blowout and sank. Now thousands of gallons of crude oil is leaking into the Gulf of Mexico daily
Yeah I was about to say... ANOTHER one?Joe wrote:you do realize this has been all over the news for 2 weeks right?hatedinthemind wrote:Has anybody else heard about this?
A oil rig named the Deepwater Horizon had a underwater blowout and sank. Now thousands of gallons of crude oil is leaking into the Gulf of Mexico daily
Joe wrote:you do realize this has been all over the news for 2 weeks right?hatedinthemind wrote:Has anybody else heard about this?
A oil rig named the Deepwater Horizon had a underwater blowout and sank. Now thousands of gallons of crude oil is leaking into the Gulf of Mexico daily
Probably.charlieo wrote:The Daily Show must have just done a piece on it...
But the world around you doesn't give you gamer points and achievements like video games do...AZhitman wrote:Less video games.
More paying attention to the world around you.
60minutes just had an interesting segment about the disaster and the cause. They interviewed one of the survivors, the chief electronics technician who had a ringside seat, as well as a government appointed investigator. Looks like it was a combination of terrible decisions, errors by three separate parties: BP, Transocean, (owner of the rig), and Haliburtan,yes d!ck Cheney's old company.EazyBreazy wrote:Here's a link from another forum with alot of information on whats going on. Alot of these guys are very knowledgeable about the oil fields and drilling processes.
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=882208
Interesting, what does Haliburtan have to do with all of this? I know Ive heard the name dropped when talking about the spill, but no specifics.Bubba1 wrote:60minutes just had an interesting segment about the disaster and the cause. They interviewed one of the survivors, the chief electronics technician who had a ringside seat, as well as a government appointed investigator. Looks like it was a combination of terrible decisions, errors by three separate parties: BP, Transocean, (owner of the rig), and Haliburtan,yes d!ck Cheney's old company.EazyBreazy wrote:Here's a link from another forum with alot of information on whats going on. Alot of these guys are very knowledgeable about the oil fields and drilling processes.
http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=882208
Very true. The root of this problem is the arrogance and impatience of BP, much due to the risk/scale of their investment. The article discussed the tension in every drilling operation has to deal with between doing things safely and doing them fast.MinisterofDOOM wrote:Bad decisions tend to become cumulative which often results in disaster.
It only takes one link to break that chain and prevent the worst. When everyone just goes along with the bad choices, all parties bear equal blame.
The sad part is there's really no incentive to be the one who breaks the chain. Had Haliburtan refused to proceed without proper safety protocols, no story would have made the news. But business would likely have gotten ugly. No good press potential, only bad.
Uh, hello? The causes were identified, substantiated by a high level eye witnesses. What is disturbing is that there were several serious lapses in safety protocol and judgement by three different companies that led to it. The only real questions left unanswered are which individuals (how high up the food chain) at each company made those stupid decisions, and who's gonna pay the massive cleanup bill.OriginalWheelman wrote:I think we should stop pointing fingers until an investigation can be finished. Seriously. We don't even know what caused it and everyone's trying to prevent the next one already. It's like trying to ban cars cause there was a big pile up. One bad accident doesn't meant he whole damned system is wrong, just that something failed. Until we figure out what caused the problem, all of this BS is pointless. For all we know it could have been an anti drilling whack job with explosives and a submarine.
Bubba1 wrote:Uh, hello? The causes were identified, substantiated by a high level eye witnesses. What is disturbing is that there were several serious lapses in safety protocol and judgement by three different companies that led to it. The only real questions left unanswered are which individuals (how high up the food chain) at each company made those stupid decisions, and who's gonna pay the massive cleanup bill.OriginalWheelman wrote:I think we should stop pointing fingers until an investigation can be finished. Seriously. We don't even know what caused it and everyone's trying to prevent the next one already. It's like trying to ban cars cause there was a big pile up. One bad accident doesn't meant he whole damned system is wrong, just that something failed. Until we figure out what caused the problem, all of this BS is pointless. For all we know it could have been an anti drilling whack job with explosives and a submarine.
Evidence other than eyewitness testimony by senior Transocean officials?? I could easily link you to other sources that will give you the same information. No one except you seems to be questioning or disputing the cause. If you're expecting BP to claim it was a vast left wing conspiracy or it was done by the Taliban, you;re going to be very disappointed. The causes are known. But, hey, if you want wait up to a year to for the Obama administration to publish some report that summarizes stuff everyone else already knows, that's your perogative.OriginalWheelman wrote:
Yeah but do you have any evidence for this other than the thread you linked? That's not evidence, no one is under oath, no one is making affidavits to the police. While the people in that thread seem to know what's up, it's not an official investigation and I don't accept it as fact. An internet ad is not evidence in a court of law. Until I read an official investigation report, the cause is unknown.
Enjoy your wait, buddy.OriginalWheelman wrote:I'm not saying that's what caused I'm I was merely saying it was within the realm of possibility.![]()
All I've read form anyone is the blame passing and speculation from the involved companies. When I see the National Academy of Engineering report and the Minerals Management Service report we can talk about cause. Witness testimony does not equate truth. As the camera age has shown us eyewitness testimony is one of the least reliable forms of evidence.
Might want to check again.sentrastace wrote:think about how bad the seafood industry is going to do because of this....a lot of it comes from the gulf.